Exactly sheik. Relying on a road grading offensive line and 3 outstanding running backs is completely different from being dependent on a spread passing attack. Tech's defense is built to defend Big 12 offenses as opposed to smash mouth football. Arkansas' running game was very effective for a half at Auburn and that game was much closer than the final score would suggest(pick 6 changed the game and forced the hogs to play from behind and lengthy weather delay also didn't do them any favors). Just saying this is not their first venture into hostile territory this year and they showed me something on the plains. Their qb looks to have improved and I don't see how Tech slows them down.
Kingsbury may be pretty, but his team's performance in the first two games has been anything but. UTEP and Central Arkansas ran the ball successfully against them(over 4 ypc) and they also accumulated 25 penalties in those games. They barely survived in those two close games and I don't see how they stop a hogs rushing attack that put up 150 first half yards at Auburn and is averaging almost 10 ypc on the season(even though Nichols St is terrible). Tech is young on defense and their qb play has been shaky at best so far.
The only thing that scares me here is the line. Opened up at Tech-4.5 and I haven't seen much support for them at all. Seems like a total mismatch to me. When I first saw the line I loved Arkansas-woke up the next day and saw that everybody else loved them too-scary. Only angle I see in this # being what it is would be Arkansas has lost 10 of last 11 games and now on the road again. They seem vastly improved though and with their upcoming schedule they need to win this one. Could be similar to a horse racing angle-long time maiden gets first win and lightbulb goes on. Can't see hogs not winning this by at least a touchdown on paper, but something about this game seems fishy. Good luck!
Exactly sheik. Relying on a road grading offensive line and 3 outstanding running backs is completely different from being dependent on a spread passing attack. Tech's defense is built to defend Big 12 offenses as opposed to smash mouth football. Arkansas' running game was very effective for a half at Auburn and that game was much closer than the final score would suggest(pick 6 changed the game and forced the hogs to play from behind and lengthy weather delay also didn't do them any favors). Just saying this is not their first venture into hostile territory this year and they showed me something on the plains. Their qb looks to have improved and I don't see how Tech slows them down.
Kingsbury may be pretty, but his team's performance in the first two games has been anything but. UTEP and Central Arkansas ran the ball successfully against them(over 4 ypc) and they also accumulated 25 penalties in those games. They barely survived in those two close games and I don't see how they stop a hogs rushing attack that put up 150 first half yards at Auburn and is averaging almost 10 ypc on the season(even though Nichols St is terrible). Tech is young on defense and their qb play has been shaky at best so far.
The only thing that scares me here is the line. Opened up at Tech-4.5 and I haven't seen much support for them at all. Seems like a total mismatch to me. When I first saw the line I loved Arkansas-woke up the next day and saw that everybody else loved them too-scary. Only angle I see in this # being what it is would be Arkansas has lost 10 of last 11 games and now on the road again. They seem vastly improved though and with their upcoming schedule they need to win this one. Could be similar to a horse racing angle-long time maiden gets first win and lightbulb goes on. Can't see hogs not winning this by at least a touchdown on paper, but something about this game seems fishy. Good luck!
According to this thought process, I suppose we should simply subscribe to the George Costanza method of handicapping-analyze the matchups and trends and upon completion simply take the opposite side of what the data suggests since the oddsmakers are trying to trick us on every game. The line and lack of movement does throw up a red flag though, but this isn't exactly a marquee matchup like last week's Oregon-MSU game and I prefer to base my plays on what I know and have seen with my eyes. I used to look at websites with % of money on each side and follow reverse line movement and all kinds of other mumbo-jumbo, but have had much more success by placing less emphasis on that type of info and a much greater emphasis on players/scheme, situation etc. Good luck!
According to this thought process, I suppose we should simply subscribe to the George Costanza method of handicapping-analyze the matchups and trends and upon completion simply take the opposite side of what the data suggests since the oddsmakers are trying to trick us on every game. The line and lack of movement does throw up a red flag though, but this isn't exactly a marquee matchup like last week's Oregon-MSU game and I prefer to base my plays on what I know and have seen with my eyes. I used to look at websites with % of money on each side and follow reverse line movement and all kinds of other mumbo-jumbo, but have had much more success by placing less emphasis on that type of info and a much greater emphasis on players/scheme, situation etc. Good luck!
against auburns backup qb for a large percentage of the game
against auburns backup qb for a large percentage of the game
We are all part of the "public." Public wins sometimes too or no one would play. When I see a line that looks too good to be true I will definitely dig a little deeper than normal and test the water a bit rather than diving in head first, but sometimes the end result is a play on the "public" side. Also, I would rather invest my money on something I have developed an opinion on through research and watching games rather than basing plays on money % on a website that may or may not be reliable or judging public opinion from a small sample size such as this forum and then fading it. I come to this website to find info -whether it be an opposing or supporting point of view- to arm me with as much knowledge as possible before I make a play, so I appreciate your input. Good luck!
We are all part of the "public." Public wins sometimes too or no one would play. When I see a line that looks too good to be true I will definitely dig a little deeper than normal and test the water a bit rather than diving in head first, but sometimes the end result is a play on the "public" side. Also, I would rather invest my money on something I have developed an opinion on through research and watching games rather than basing plays on money % on a website that may or may not be reliable or judging public opinion from a small sample size such as this forum and then fading it. I come to this website to find info -whether it be an opposing or supporting point of view- to arm me with as much knowledge as possible before I make a play, so I appreciate your input. Good luck!
I'm a Tech fan so take this for what it's worth.
First glance, blow out time in Lubbock. Arkansas will run all over Tech and win by 21. To much power up front and Tech has horrible linebackers and DL.
Look deeper and you will see Tech's key nose tackle was hurt on 5th play of 1st game. 375 lbs of beef that will be back this week. Will it matter. A little but Tech still gets run over.
Arkansas can't cover for garbage. Tech may score at will and hasn't shown anything the first 2 games. I believe coaching staff has been game planning all summer for this game and overlooked first two. Who thought Tech would like up ASU. It happens.
Combat is right about Lubbock and the Auburn backup QB is legit. Dude would be starting on 98% of the teams this year. Just stuck behind a stud.
Still think Arky wins but warning not to go too crazy.
I'm a Tech fan so take this for what it's worth.
First glance, blow out time in Lubbock. Arkansas will run all over Tech and win by 21. To much power up front and Tech has horrible linebackers and DL.
Look deeper and you will see Tech's key nose tackle was hurt on 5th play of 1st game. 375 lbs of beef that will be back this week. Will it matter. A little but Tech still gets run over.
Arkansas can't cover for garbage. Tech may score at will and hasn't shown anything the first 2 games. I believe coaching staff has been game planning all summer for this game and overlooked first two. Who thought Tech would like up ASU. It happens.
Combat is right about Lubbock and the Auburn backup QB is legit. Dude would be starting on 98% of the teams this year. Just stuck behind a stud.
Still think Arky wins but warning not to go too crazy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.