All Forums | College Football

BAMA fans/backers....Do you honestly think the Tide wins if McCoy doesnt get hurt?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1768
Posts: 59
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54497
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by KasperNV:

Colt got hurt. Dont you know anything about football? The defense was on the field waaay too long due to 3 and outs and short drives/turnovers by Gilbert.....

Get a clue bro

I would say I do, 6-0 down the stretch how about you? Or do you make excuses for everytime you are on the wrong side?

 

Wrong side??.....read the post. Wrong side because best player got hurt. You picked the wrong side and got lucky....it happens. Congrats on your win. Man you know college football....

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34756
Posted: #52
I'd take Bama all the way up to -14.5 against Cincy, then.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 13710
Posted: #53

Wrong side??.....read the post. Wrong side because best player got hurt. You picked the wrong side and got lucky....it happens. Congrats on your win. Man you know college football.... \

 

And you don't, cry until next year where we will have to see another cry baby post.

Second mouse gets the cheese.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 3615
Posted: #54
Bama would have won and covered either way.  We have all cried about why we lost some bets, but its all the same
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 880
Posted: #55

To answer the question in your post, yes. I do think Bama would've won. I wagered my money with expectations Colt McCoy would play the whole game.

From a fans perspective, I hate when shit like this happens because then people start saying "What if?" Well if my aunt had a dick, she'd be my uncle.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 6533
Posted: #56
This is funny to me. You Texas backers lost, face it, and get over it. Nobody has a clue who would have won the game if McCoy had played. THAT'S WHY IT'S CALLED GAMBLING.........BOO HOO
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 6
Posted: #57

What makes me laugh is the fact that people say if he would have played.  Texas would have won if he didnt get hurt...... well he did play.  He played and couldnt take the first hit that came at him. You cant say that if he would have played texas would have won because HE DID PLAY.  A team like Texas shouldnt depend on just one guy.  Its Texas, they do an amazing job at recruiting, and shouldnt have had Gilbert so unprepared.  Its funny that guys like Train think they were right last night but they got screwed. Next time dont bet on a team with a fragile QB and a virgin QB (poor kid).   You were wrong and you were on the wrong side and i know you wont admit it but thats what makes victory taste so sweet.  I hate it for Colt and Texas because i was impressed with them and think they deserved to be in that game but when it comes down to it, Texas couldnt stop the run.  The O line for texas couldnt stop the pressure and poor gilbert got drilled because of it.  True, as a bama fan i will admit...the game was ugly.  Bad coaching and truly a strange game.  I wasnt happy at the execution but the Defense played great and in the end Bama Won.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 16348
Posted: #58
agreed train,,and that putz saban showed me nothing--horns would have wiped them out--saban is classless cocah tho,,did you see the gatorade shower,,the players DO NOT like this guy,,his OWN players
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 33992
Posted: #59

Quote Originally Posted by fruit20:

heres what no one will admit tex should have not been playing they cheated neb...nuff said tex got ass beat ...simple 37-21...

 yep thats the gist of it

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.