Wake Forest didnt cover. So tell me how is it 3-2?
Wake Forest didnt cover. So tell me how is it 3-2?
3-5-1 the last 2 days if you had Wake Forest at -3.
3-5-1 the last 2 days if you had Wake Forest at -3.
Today will be no different. Play the averages not the trend. Some may look at this as negativity, but I'm just trying to offer another perspective that has worked in the past.
Today will be no different. Play the averages not the trend. Some may look at this as negativity, but I'm just trying to offer another perspective that has worked in the past.
Today will be no different. Play the averages not the trend. Some may look at this as negativity, but I'm just trying to offer another perspective that has worked in the past.
Today will be no different. Play the averages not the trend. Some may look at this as negativity, but I'm just trying to offer another perspective that has worked in the past.
Even simpler is to fade the system plays. That's what I'm saying. No need for a seperate thread but if you'd like me to spell out the opposite teams for you just let me know.
Even simpler is to fade the system plays. That's what I'm saying. No need for a seperate thread but if you'd like me to spell out the opposite teams for you just let me know.
Nesby, it's no use to try to convince a herd of sheep. We've already made our point on page 11. Yes defensive ratings are a good place to start when betting bowl games/NFL playoffs, but what these folks are failing to realize is there are more compelling stats to take into consideration. I bet 90% of the people on this forum don't watch games or review film.
Last, I wouldn't call this a fade thread and to go against all system plays. Just use your head and decipher things for yourselves. Obviously all the UVA backers never watched Bronco Mendenhall coach at BYU, most vanilla offense you will ever see. For those that don't know Bronco is the head coach of UVA now.
Nesby, it's no use to try to convince a herd of sheep. We've already made our point on page 11. Yes defensive ratings are a good place to start when betting bowl games/NFL playoffs, but what these folks are failing to realize is there are more compelling stats to take into consideration. I bet 90% of the people on this forum don't watch games or review film.
Last, I wouldn't call this a fade thread and to go against all system plays. Just use your head and decipher things for yourselves. Obviously all the UVA backers never watched Bronco Mendenhall coach at BYU, most vanilla offense you will ever see. For those that don't know Bronco is the head coach of UVA now.
Even simpler is to fade the system plays. That's what I'm saying. No need for a seperate thread but if you'd like me to spell out the opposite teams for you just let me know.
Even simpler is to fade the system plays. That's what I'm saying. No need for a seperate thread but if you'd like me to spell out the opposite teams for you just let me know.
Dude no one is bashing anyone. Please read through and show me where someone has been disrespectful or negative. This is a public forum open for discussion. If you can't handle that stay off the internet. Besides all we're trying to do is raise a point so that maybe we can advance this system and build off of it. You must look at the short term, I look at longevity. Best of luck to you on your wagers though, and no that isn't sarsasm I wish everyone the best of luck.
Dude no one is bashing anyone. Please read through and show me where someone has been disrespectful or negative. This is a public forum open for discussion. If you can't handle that stay off the internet. Besides all we're trying to do is raise a point so that maybe we can advance this system and build off of it. You must look at the short term, I look at longevity. Best of luck to you on your wagers though, and no that isn't sarsasm I wish everyone the best of luck.
Dude no one is bashing anyone. Please read through and show me where someone has been disrespectful or negative. This is a public forum open for discussion. If you can't handle that stay off the internet. Besides all we're trying to do is raise a point so that maybe we can advance this system and build off of it. You must look at the short term, I look at longevity. Best of luck to you on your wagers though, and no that isn't sarsasm I wish everyone the best of luck.
Discussion is a great thing. Trying to enhance a system is a great thing. Telling people to simply fade the system is NOT a great thing.
If I start seeing people simply bashing I will give one warning and then start sending people to the PB
Dude no one is bashing anyone. Please read through and show me where someone has been disrespectful or negative. This is a public forum open for discussion. If you can't handle that stay off the internet. Besides all we're trying to do is raise a point so that maybe we can advance this system and build off of it. You must look at the short term, I look at longevity. Best of luck to you on your wagers though, and no that isn't sarsasm I wish everyone the best of luck.
Discussion is a great thing. Trying to enhance a system is a great thing. Telling people to simply fade the system is NOT a great thing.
If I start seeing people simply bashing I will give one warning and then start sending people to the PB
The goal here is to pick winners right? If there is a system which has done very well but is turning, why wouldn't fading be a good strategy? There is nothing negative here. We're all trying to find the best angle to find an edge. Everyone is obviously free to do as they please.
The goal here is to pick winners right? If there is a system which has done very well but is turning, why wouldn't fading be a good strategy? There is nothing negative here. We're all trying to find the best angle to find an edge. Everyone is obviously free to do as they please.
The goal here is to pick winners right? If there is a system which has done very well but is turning, why wouldn't fading be a good strategy? There is nothing negative here. We're all trying to find the best angle to find an edge. Everyone is obviously free to do as they please.
The goal here is to pick winners right? If there is a system which has done very well but is turning, why wouldn't fading be a good strategy? There is nothing negative here. We're all trying to find the best angle to find an edge. Everyone is obviously free to do as they please.
I agree and as I said a few posts earlier fading isn't the answer. Some of these higher defensive teams might be the better play on any given game. With that taken into consideration and how well the system performed at the onset. Now is the time to start considering some alternatives stats/trends to mix in with the defensive ratings.
No bashing on my posts. I got love for everyone and I love money even more. So let's all put our heads together and get this cash. Like BIG said if it ain't about the money pappa just don't care. BOL Houston & everyone else regardless of your selection.
I agree and as I said a few posts earlier fading isn't the answer. Some of these higher defensive teams might be the better play on any given game. With that taken into consideration and how well the system performed at the onset. Now is the time to start considering some alternatives stats/trends to mix in with the defensive ratings.
No bashing on my posts. I got love for everyone and I love money even more. So let's all put our heads together and get this cash. Like BIG said if it ain't about the money pappa just don't care. BOL Houston & everyone else regardless of your selection.
The goal here is to pick winners right? If there is a system which has done very well but is turning, why wouldn't fading be a good strategy? There is nothing negative here. We're all trying to find the best angle to find an edge. Everyone is obviously free to do as they please.
The goal here is to pick winners right? If there is a system which has done very well but is turning, why wouldn't fading be a good strategy? There is nothing negative here. We're all trying to find the best angle to find an edge. Everyone is obviously free to do as they please.
Posting your angle here here adds zero value, obviously.
Posting your angle here here adds zero value, obviously.
If you followed my angle when I started calling it out you'd be up money the last two days instead of down.
If you followed my angle when I started calling it out you'd be up money the last two days instead of down.
If you followed my angle when I started calling it out you'd be up money the last two days instead of down.
If you followed my angle when I started calling it out you'd be up money the last two days instead of down.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.