Ironically I have found myself reading the same kind of BS on RxForum as people were tearing down RanDizzle. So instead of trying to be creative twice here is what I posted on the forum...but yet applies here:
Ironically I have found myself reading the same kind of BS on RxForum as people were tearing down RanDizzle. So instead of trying to be creative twice here is what I posted on the forum...but yet applies here:
Sherriffics, I would have to agree. Buffalo considers this historic...as would I. The one thing that handicapping, statisitics, or anything else has a hard time considering is emotion. This game counts.
While I think that UCONN should cover I don't believe the value is there. Good luck to any of you that bet it though.
Sherriffics, I would have to agree. Buffalo considers this historic...as would I. The one thing that handicapping, statisitics, or anything else has a hard time considering is emotion. This game counts.
While I think that UCONN should cover I don't believe the value is there. Good luck to any of you that bet it though.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.