Wallstreet, I really don't get where your coming from. As long as this guy treats people right and doesn't charge for his picks, I see nothing wrong with a little "drama."
Bibendi could have a part time job here with all the time and energy he puts in. I appreciate you looking out and making sure this forum is run right but damn,seems your not cutting this cat any slack at all.
Of course I could be totally wrong in which case I duly apologize.
0
Wallstreet, I really don't get where your coming from. As long as this guy treats people right and doesn't charge for his picks, I see nothing wrong with a little "drama."
Bibendi could have a part time job here with all the time and energy he puts in. I appreciate you looking out and making sure this forum is run right but damn,seems your not cutting this cat any slack at all.
Of course I could be totally wrong in which case I duly apologize.
Hey wallstreet, making him post all his plays was uncool..he has developed quite a following here.not just picks but intelligent analysis as well..its guys like him that make covers what it is today...covers is about guys like him not overbearing people like yourself...........
0
Hey wallstreet, making him post all his plays was uncool..he has developed quite a following here.not just picks but intelligent analysis as well..its guys like him that make covers what it is today...covers is about guys like him not overbearing people like yourself...........
All I care is if the drama is gone, you have all the fun you want, but believe me when these "string along" tactics are used people get mad, threads turn into 500 post nightmares and it turns into a mess.
bibendi, dont you think giving current lines and games is the right way to do this? You wait 10 days and these lines are going to be way off and people are going to wonder why you didnt post earlier and the line blah blah.
I also didnt threaten you or the post with the box, read it again. If the thread got out of hand it would be moved. Its like Vegas, the odds are you doing this would turn the thread into a drama nightmare.
I dont see anyone else doing the "I will post one game a day" tactic, if you dont see the reasoning then you didnt have to do what I was requesting. The choice was yours and I hope you do the "one writeup a day" deal still.
0
Listen silly rabbits..
All I care is if the drama is gone, you have all the fun you want, but believe me when these "string along" tactics are used people get mad, threads turn into 500 post nightmares and it turns into a mess.
bibendi, dont you think giving current lines and games is the right way to do this? You wait 10 days and these lines are going to be way off and people are going to wonder why you didnt post earlier and the line blah blah.
I also didnt threaten you or the post with the box, read it again. If the thread got out of hand it would be moved. Its like Vegas, the odds are you doing this would turn the thread into a drama nightmare.
I dont see anyone else doing the "I will post one game a day" tactic, if you dont see the reasoning then you didnt have to do what I was requesting. The choice was yours and I hope you do the "one writeup a day" deal still.
no biggy bro.....a rookie spouting "lock" and "guarantee" is one thing, but you have been nothing but pleasant and forthcoming, not to mention have solid picks!!!.....why would anyone mess with you??.....just irritates me.....some good cappers have been driven off for similar reasons.....there is no form to sign that says posts MUST follow a guideline.....
pbox.........been there, done that
0
no biggy bro.....a rookie spouting "lock" and "guarantee" is one thing, but you have been nothing but pleasant and forthcoming, not to mention have solid picks!!!.....why would anyone mess with you??.....just irritates me.....some good cappers have been driven off for similar reasons.....there is no form to sign that says posts MUST follow a guideline.....
All I care is if the drama is gone, you have all the fun you want, but believe me when these "string along" tactics are used people get mad, threads turn into 500 post nightmares and it turns into a mess.
That is why I posted early in my thread that all I wanted was insight into the game and no well wishing to make make sure it didnt get out of control. I think that by posting 1 play a day we get some solid feedback from everybody and it actually helps Covers members seeing both sides of an argument
bibendi, dont you think giving current lines and games is the right way to do this? You wait 10 days and these lines are going to be way off and people are going to wonder why you didnt post earlier and the line blah blah.
I do agree with this statement and overlooked it
I also didnt threaten you or the post with the box, read it again. If the thread got out of hand it would be moved. Its like Vegas, the odds are you doing this would turn the thread into a drama nightmare.
I figured by you saying it would be moved youd move it to where all the other drama threads go, the PBox. I think I had the correct assumption there
I dont see anyone else doing the "I will post one game a day" tactic, if you dont see the reasoning then you didnt have to do what I was requesting. The choice was yours and I hope you do the "one writeup a day" deal still.
I will be doing a write-up a day but I think it will make the thread even more jumbled. People are going to be dissecting my plays in the meantime and I'll be jumping all over the place to answer questions.
Its all good, will just have to have multiple Bowl Game threads I guess. Sorry if you think I'm trying to draw attention to myself this is just what I enjoy to do and have been pretty successful so I dont mess with whats been working
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Listen silly rabbits..
All I care is if the drama is gone, you have all the fun you want, but believe me when these "string along" tactics are used people get mad, threads turn into 500 post nightmares and it turns into a mess.
That is why I posted early in my thread that all I wanted was insight into the game and no well wishing to make make sure it didnt get out of control. I think that by posting 1 play a day we get some solid feedback from everybody and it actually helps Covers members seeing both sides of an argument
bibendi, dont you think giving current lines and games is the right way to do this? You wait 10 days and these lines are going to be way off and people are going to wonder why you didnt post earlier and the line blah blah.
I do agree with this statement and overlooked it
I also didnt threaten you or the post with the box, read it again. If the thread got out of hand it would be moved. Its like Vegas, the odds are you doing this would turn the thread into a drama nightmare.
I figured by you saying it would be moved youd move it to where all the other drama threads go, the PBox. I think I had the correct assumption there
I dont see anyone else doing the "I will post one game a day" tactic, if you dont see the reasoning then you didnt have to do what I was requesting. The choice was yours and I hope you do the "one writeup a day" deal still.
I will be doing a write-up a day but I think it will make the thread even more jumbled. People are going to be dissecting my plays in the meantime and I'll be jumping all over the place to answer questions.
Its all good, will just have to have multiple Bowl Game threads I guess. Sorry if you think I'm trying to draw attention to myself this is just what I enjoy to do and have been pretty successful so I dont mess with whats been working
I would have to say that a very under hyped and often overlooked Pitt team at +3 against a very overrated Oregon State team is by far one of my top plays this bowl season. Care to look inside this one for me? I'd appreciate an outsiders view.
0
I would have to say that a very under hyped and often overlooked Pitt team at +3 against a very overrated Oregon State team is by far one of my top plays this bowl season. Care to look inside this one for me? I'd appreciate an outsiders view.
absolutea- my site had not put out a line on that game yet. I was curious to see where they put it. That Oregon St. team is not overrated btw. They lost to Oregon big but they didnt have Jacquizz Rodgers who basically is their entire team. Oregon St. did a good job against the run vs. USC in the only game I really watched of theirs. It is looking like a no play unless I hear some news on Rodgers injury being worse than originally thought
0
absolutea- my site had not put out a line on that game yet. I was curious to see where they put it. That Oregon St. team is not overrated btw. They lost to Oregon big but they didnt have Jacquizz Rodgers who basically is their entire team. Oregon St. did a good job against the run vs. USC in the only game I really watched of theirs. It is looking like a no play unless I hear some news on Rodgers injury being worse than originally thought
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.