All Forums | College Football

Billy Walters Bowl Picks

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 51888
Posts: 221
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8485
Posted: #101
??
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8485
Posted: #102
??
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8485
Posted: #103
??
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8485
Posted: #104
Only bator knows for sure
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 105
Posted: #105
Is that Billy Walters in Papa's profile pic?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #106
Quote Originally Posted by gcwrestling08:



lol...care to expound? i'm not sure how a sarcastic comment can be interpreted as "dumb." i realize you have a limited vocabulary, but you may need to be a bit more specific about what was so "dumb."

Dumb would be calling the Browns the PLAY OF THE YEAR in Week 1

If it wasn't for buffer you'd be the dumbest user on Covers 

"Posted: 9/11/2016 11:49:19 AM
seeing some people on the Eagles -4 and laughing quietly to myself...this will be the only game this season that they're favored. they are god awful, starting a rookie with sore ribs. Browns actually have a good team now.

BROWNS +4 by far the best play of the week, possibly the entire season"

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=102312878
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #107
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


Dumb would be calling the Browns the PLAY OF THE YEAR in Week 1

If it wasn't for buffer you'd be the dumbest user on Covers 

"Posted: 9/11/2016 11:49:19 AM
seeing some people on the Eagles -4 and laughing quietly to myself...this will be the only game this season that they're favored. they are god awful, starting a rookie with sore ribs. Browns actually have a good team now.

BROWNS +4 by far the best play of the week, possibly the entire season"

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=102312878

And he has the nerve to troll my threads
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #108
Quote Originally Posted by Roggs05:

Papa - great info... 100% believe what you are saying... THE ONLY THING TO CAUTION HERE - even if you watched the 60 minutes or know Billy he is notorious for setting up middles for himself... So lets say this information is accurate... We do not necessarily know if he did this to set up middles... For example tonight he is sitting on BYU -8 - we will never know if he capped the game at 10 and is trying to hit the other side wyoming +11 before kick etc... I am assuming this is why you said take this information for what it is... His record is 4 - 1 now which is good... Just something to consider guys

Even if he is setting up middles, none have hit.

And the middle on the BYU game is a tough one to get. The number closed at -11 late so his only chance to middle is 10. But it was 10 for the overwhelming majority of the week. And if he bought in at 10 he'd be middling 9, a dead, almost worthless middle.

And there can't be a middle on the Army game as he bought in at -10. So take these picks at face value IMO.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 858
Posted: #109
Quote Originally Posted by slickvic1979:

Is that Billy Walters in Papa's profile pic?


https://bfy.tw/98q0
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5105
Posted: #110
left covers threads for awhile comeback and i see the name bator
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 268
Posted: #111
Quote Originally Posted by tamegoro:

Thank you for the info but he will lose a lot of money......
YEAH MAN PPL BE PUT UP BS PICK IF BW DID PLAY THEM GAMES HE SUCKS THEM REAL BAD PLAYS I AM HERE TO HELP NO BS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 1182
Posted: #112
In 3 cases I immediately thought that if someone knew what they were doing, it would make a lot of sense to bet AF, BYU, and Miss St big.  Miss St and AF were -11.5 and moved to 14.5, and Wyoming went all the way to 10.5... 10.5 was unbelievably high agaist Wyoming
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 13918
Posted: #113
Quote Originally Posted by BURG2VEGAS:

left covers threads for awhile comeback and i see the name bator


Yes. I did the same thing.

Bator has always been a good read.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2016
Posts: 476
Posted: #114
Billy/Papa is 1-3
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 29027
Posted: #115
Quote Originally Posted by firesox:

Billy/Papa is 1-3


Billy is currently 4-4 right now.  I didn't and haven't bet any of his picks.  As I stated in a different post, someone sent me his other picks including Army and Clemson with 4 totals after the games were over.  He was 3-1 in totals and has been 1-3 in sides so far.  

He has left pending that I know of...

Florida State +7
Air Force -12.5
Louisville +3.5
Clemson +140

Again, I never told anyone to tail and I never said I was betting them either.  I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers.  If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2016
Posts: 36
Posted: #116
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:



Billy is currently 4-4 right now.  I didn't and haven't bet any of his picks.  As I stated in a different post, someone sent me his other picks including Army and Clemson with 4 totals after the games were over.  He was 3-1 in totals and has been 1-3 in sides so far.  

He has left pending that I know of...

Florida State +7
Air Force -12.5
Louisville +3.5
Clemson +140

Again, I never told anyone to tail and I never said I was betting them either.  I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers.  If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault.  


If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1331
Posted: #117
  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 29027
Posted: #118
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:



If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?

I was just sharing information I received.  When did I recommend not to play his picks?  I said I didn't play his picks and I don't blindly tail people.  And I said if you blindly tail people and lose, it's your fault.  Don't put words in my mouth.  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #119
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:



If that's the case, what was the point of starting this thread in the first place? lol You wanted to tell people what Billy Walter's picks were but also recommend that nobody play them because it's dumb to blindly tail someone's picks?

He told you the picks. You can fade them if you'd like. I was shocked he got Army -10 when it opened at -7. That really cost him of true and seemed square-ish from the alleged #1 sharp.

Got me really thinking about that game and spread and what side I should be on. Whether BW won or lost was meaningless to me. Just starting the thought process about a game that didn't interest me was helpful.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2016
Posts: 36
Posted: #120
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:


I was just sharing information I received.  When did I recommend not to play his picks?  I said I didn't play his picks and I don't blindly tail people.  And I said if you blindly tail people and lose, it's your fault.  Don't put words in my mouth.  


Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers.  If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."

So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."

Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.

Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?

 I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #121

Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:



Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers.  If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."

So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."

Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.

Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?

 I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.

These fu**ing trolls. This isn't even about Papa. I just have to rid the site of these bast ards.

I post Colin Cowherd's picks on occassion.

To some he's the sharpest capping mind in public broadcasting.

To others he's a huge square.

I don't care how people read into it. I post the picks because it is in the public sphere.

Who the hell are you to say BW's picks are square or sharp? They didn't affect any of my bets. If they affected yours, so be it. If they didn't why the hell would you care if they affected nameless faceless posters???

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 29027
Posted: #122
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:



Your exact words were "I don't tail random people's picks, including Billy Walters, especially after lines have already moved away from his numbers.  If you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's your fault."

So you are basically saying "Here are Billy Walter's picks. I don't tail random people's picks, though. You guys can do whatever you want with this information but the lines have already moved away from his numbers and if you blindly tail his picks and lose, it's not my fault, it's yours."

Am I taking crazy pills? Isn't that what you just said? You are sharing what appears to be information that is difficult for the general public to see, yet you aren't even playing any of those plays yourself, and you also tell everyone that if you tail his picks and lose, it's everyone's fault for tailing blindly.

Again, what was the purpose of posting his plays in the first place if you (a seasoned veteran gambler apparently) don't even feel the plays are worthy enough to tail? It just seems like this thread caused way more negativity than anything else and achieved nothing. You had to have known people were going to jump all over you after you posted this and claim you don't really have his picks. Yet, you were never even going to play any of them in the first place. So why should anyone else?

 I'm sure if his plays 7-1 instead of 4-4 at the moment, you probably would be basking in the love that everyone would be praising you with for sharing the info. Once the sides went 1-3, you start acting like it would have been dumb for anyone to tail those picks blindly. How long have you been on Covers? You know how many degenerates are on this site, salivating for information and plays like this. Seems a bit irresponsible and just a huge attention grab on your part.

What in god's green earth are you talking about?  Are you okay?  This is such an embarrassing post, there's no need to actually respond in full.  Good luck with your wagers.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 29027
Posted: #123
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

These fu**ing trolls. This isn't even about Papa. I just have to rid the site of these bast ards.

I post Colin Cowherd's picks on occassion.

To some he's the sharpest capping mind in public broadcasting.

To others he's a huge square.

I don't care how people read into it. I post the picks because it is in the public sphere.

Who the hell are you to say BW's picks are square or sharp? They didn't affect any of my bets. If they affected yours, so be it. If they didn't why the hell would you care if they affected nameless faceless posters???


It's just so strange how I am the bad person for sharing some information I attained.  These people tail blindly, lose, and then have so much built up frustration that they need to take it out on the Original Poster.  It's just weird.  It doesn't bother me though because this is a free forum and I didn't lose any money on BW picks.  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 29027
Posted: #124
Post #1:
"You can believe me or not, I don't really care.  He bet these for $180k each at the Mirage the other day.  Do whatever you want with the info.  "

Post #9:
"I'm just trying to give you guys information that could be useful into capping/betting these bowl games because that's what this forum is supposed to be about."

Post #55:
"Good luck to everyone that tails or fades or does nothing with this information.  "


Show me where I suggested to tail his picks or where I said I was tailing his picks.  If you want to tail someone, it is your money, you have every right to.  But, if you do tail someone, don't come back and bitchh about it.  I gave out information I was given about a big bettor that is widely known in the sports betting world.  I have no idea if he bet the other way at other casinos or had runners to bet the other way to try to middle games.  I was told he bet certain games for $180,000 each.  If you blindly tailed his picks or anyone on this forum's picks, it is your fault.  If someone gives you a stock or investment tip and you use that information to gamble with your money and lose, it is YOUR fault.  Are you paying for the information I gave you?  No, you're not.  So, nobody has any obligation to make you or anyone else on this forum money.  
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 56149
Posted: #125
Papa,  I don't know why but you seem to get the biggest idiot trolls always on your asss.    So many dumb people on this site it's amazing. 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.