Posted:
#126
PAPPA JUST TELL THEM DEZ
0
Billy Walters Bowl Picks
Posted:
#128
LOL good lord, you and Scal are acting like I came in here calling you a bunch of names and spewing nonsense. All I said was that this thread seems meaningless, once you clearly stated that you weren't going to play any of BW's picks, nor would you EVER blindly tail someone. You're saying on the one hand, you don't tail anybody's picks blindly. On the other hand, you're telling everyone here to "do what you want" with the info. What info is there really? Just that BW played these plays, the lines are likely long gone, we have no idea if he's actually on these plays or if he intends to hit the other side of the line hard. We don't know any of that. There's also no analysis involved in the picks either.
So think about it. If a viewer comes across this thread, sees that the Great Billy Walters' plays are posted from some inside source, don't you think that most people would want to play those picks? Who the hell is sitting on here thinking to themselves, "Ooooo, Billy Walters is on this team, so I'm going to fade that loser!" Nobody. The only thing that people would do is blindly tail that particular team, or pass on that particular game altogether if they felt strongly about the other side initially. That's it. I'd venture to guess the majority of people would tail. This site is nothing but a bunch of action junkies, looking for the next big tip. What did you expect?
You post BW's picks, claim that you think he hit around 65% on the season, that some of the books might even seek his help in setting lines, and start things off by saying that he also bet a bunch of totals on games that already started and won all of those too. Oh, and of course told us all he's 4-1 already on games that you weren't able to post in time. What kind of degenerate is going to come into this thread, read all of that information, and think to themselves "hmmm, I better not tail any of these remaining games" or "hmmm, I think I'll fade the rest of these plays." Most are going to want to tail after reading all of that info. Why is that so difficult to understand? That's why I said it's irresponsible of you, because you know there are tons of people that will latch on to that info and just blindly tail, not knowing any of BW's intentions when making those bets.
I don't see how that puts me in the same category as these other trolls. I'm simply confused as to what the purpose of this thread was in the first place. It took you 5 pages of this thread before you adamantly stated you weren't playing any of these plays and that tailing anyone picks is stupid and on us. Why not just say that right off the bat? Or better yet, not even post the thread in the first place? Again, you had to have known that the majority of these responses were going to be people questioning your validity, whining, moaning, asking dumb questions, etc. Do you really think anyone took this info and used it the way you were intending them to? And Scal, posting Colin Cowherd's weekly picks are a bit different. Those plays can easily be heard/seen by anyone. It's not every day that you see a thread on here with Billy Walter's bowl picks.
But whatever, just assume I don't know what the heck I'm talking about and spewing nonsense. The truth of the matter is, Papa likes the attention when things he contributes to the forum go well. He disappears or conveniently doesn't have much to say when the info he provides goes poorly. Just look at this thread. You posted BW's plays, had to come back immediately after Game 1 to let us all know that it had won. Then coincidentally, no more game by game updates when the next 3 games lost. It was only until someone made a comment about the plays being 1-3, that Papa magically appeared again to comment (at which point he reminded us all that the earlier plays that he didn't get to post went 3-1 and that Papa would never dare follow any of these plays in the first place). It just all seems so childish. He does the same thing over in the MMA forum as well. He gives us a fight by fight update when his plays are winning and then disappears after he goes 0-11 to finish up the event. The act grows tiresome and I was simply questioning the point of this thread.
So think about it. If a viewer comes across this thread, sees that the Great Billy Walters' plays are posted from some inside source, don't you think that most people would want to play those picks? Who the hell is sitting on here thinking to themselves, "Ooooo, Billy Walters is on this team, so I'm going to fade that loser!" Nobody. The only thing that people would do is blindly tail that particular team, or pass on that particular game altogether if they felt strongly about the other side initially. That's it. I'd venture to guess the majority of people would tail. This site is nothing but a bunch of action junkies, looking for the next big tip. What did you expect?
You post BW's picks, claim that you think he hit around 65% on the season, that some of the books might even seek his help in setting lines, and start things off by saying that he also bet a bunch of totals on games that already started and won all of those too. Oh, and of course told us all he's 4-1 already on games that you weren't able to post in time. What kind of degenerate is going to come into this thread, read all of that information, and think to themselves "hmmm, I better not tail any of these remaining games" or "hmmm, I think I'll fade the rest of these plays." Most are going to want to tail after reading all of that info. Why is that so difficult to understand? That's why I said it's irresponsible of you, because you know there are tons of people that will latch on to that info and just blindly tail, not knowing any of BW's intentions when making those bets.
I don't see how that puts me in the same category as these other trolls. I'm simply confused as to what the purpose of this thread was in the first place. It took you 5 pages of this thread before you adamantly stated you weren't playing any of these plays and that tailing anyone picks is stupid and on us. Why not just say that right off the bat? Or better yet, not even post the thread in the first place? Again, you had to have known that the majority of these responses were going to be people questioning your validity, whining, moaning, asking dumb questions, etc. Do you really think anyone took this info and used it the way you were intending them to? And Scal, posting Colin Cowherd's weekly picks are a bit different. Those plays can easily be heard/seen by anyone. It's not every day that you see a thread on here with Billy Walter's bowl picks.
But whatever, just assume I don't know what the heck I'm talking about and spewing nonsense. The truth of the matter is, Papa likes the attention when things he contributes to the forum go well. He disappears or conveniently doesn't have much to say when the info he provides goes poorly. Just look at this thread. You posted BW's plays, had to come back immediately after Game 1 to let us all know that it had won. Then coincidentally, no more game by game updates when the next 3 games lost. It was only until someone made a comment about the plays being 1-3, that Papa magically appeared again to comment (at which point he reminded us all that the earlier plays that he didn't get to post went 3-1 and that Papa would never dare follow any of these plays in the first place). It just all seems so childish. He does the same thing over in the MMA forum as well. He gives us a fight by fight update when his plays are winning and then disappears after he goes 0-11 to finish up the event. The act grows tiresome and I was simply questioning the point of this thread.
0
Posted:
#129
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:
LOL good lord, you and Scal are acting like I came in here calling you a bunch of names and spewing nonsense. All I said was that this thread seems meaningless, once you clearly stated that you weren't going to play any of BW's picks, nor would you EVER blindly tail someone. You're saying on the one hand, you don't tail anybody's picks blindly. On the other hand, you're telling everyone here to "do what you want" with the info. What info is there really? Just that BW played these plays, the lines are likely long gone, we have no idea if he's actually on these plays or if he intends to hit the other side of the line hard. We don't know any of that. There's also no analysis involved in the picks either.
So think about it. If a viewer comes across this thread, sees that the Great Billy Walters' plays are posted from some inside source, don't you think that most people would want to play those picks? Who the hell is sitting on here thinking to themselves, "Ooooo, Billy Walters is on this team, so I'm going to fade that loser!" Nobody. The only thing that people would do is blindly tail that particular team, or pass on that particular game altogether if they felt strongly about the other side initially. That's it. I'd venture to guess the majority of people would tail. This site is nothing but a bunch of action junkies, looking for the next big tip. What did you expect?
You post BW's picks, claim that you think he hit around 65% on the season, that some of the books might even seek his help in setting lines, and start things off by saying that he also bet a bunch of totals on games that already started and won all of those too. Oh, and of course told us all he's 4-1 already on games that you weren't able to post in time. What kind of degenerate is going to come into this thread, read all of that information, and think to themselves "hmmm, I better not tail any of these remaining games" or "hmmm, I think I'll fade the rest of these plays." Most are going to want to tail after reading all of that info. Why is that so difficult to understand? That's why I said it's irresponsible of you, because you know there are tons of people that will latch on to that info and just blindly tail, not knowing any of BW's intentions when making those bets.
I don't see how that puts me in the same category as these other trolls. I'm simply confused as to what the purpose of this thread was in the first place. It took you 5 pages of this thread before you adamantly stated you weren't playing any of these plays and that tailing anyone picks is stupid and on us. Why not just say that right off the bat? Or better yet, not even post the thread in the first place? Again, you had to have known that the majority of these responses were going to be people questioning your validity, whining, moaning, asking dumb questions, etc. Do you really think anyone took this info and used it the way you were intending them to? And Scal, posting Colin Cowherd's weekly picks are a bit different. Those plays can easily be heard/seen by anyone. It's not every day that you see a thread on here with Billy Walter's bowl picks.
But whatever, just assume I don't know what the heck I'm talking about and spewing nonsense. The truth of the matter is, Papa likes the attention when things he contributes to the forum go well. He disappears or conveniently doesn't have much to say when the info he provides goes poorly. Just look at this thread. You posted BW's plays, had to come back immediately after Game 1 to let us all know that it had won. Then coincidentally, no more game by game updates when the next 3 games lost. It was only until someone made a comment about the plays being 1-3, that Papa magically appeared again to comment (at which point he reminded us all that the earlier plays that he didn't get to post went 3-1 and that Papa would never dare follow any of these plays in the first place). It just all seems so childish. He does the same thing over in the MMA forum as well. He gives us a fight by fight update when his plays are winning and then disappears after he goes 0-11 to finish up the event. The act grows tiresome and I was simply questioning the point of this thread.
LOL good lord, you and Scal are acting like I came in here calling you a bunch of names and spewing nonsense. All I said was that this thread seems meaningless, once you clearly stated that you weren't going to play any of BW's picks, nor would you EVER blindly tail someone. You're saying on the one hand, you don't tail anybody's picks blindly. On the other hand, you're telling everyone here to "do what you want" with the info. What info is there really? Just that BW played these plays, the lines are likely long gone, we have no idea if he's actually on these plays or if he intends to hit the other side of the line hard. We don't know any of that. There's also no analysis involved in the picks either.
So think about it. If a viewer comes across this thread, sees that the Great Billy Walters' plays are posted from some inside source, don't you think that most people would want to play those picks? Who the hell is sitting on here thinking to themselves, "Ooooo, Billy Walters is on this team, so I'm going to fade that loser!" Nobody. The only thing that people would do is blindly tail that particular team, or pass on that particular game altogether if they felt strongly about the other side initially. That's it. I'd venture to guess the majority of people would tail. This site is nothing but a bunch of action junkies, looking for the next big tip. What did you expect?
You post BW's picks, claim that you think he hit around 65% on the season, that some of the books might even seek his help in setting lines, and start things off by saying that he also bet a bunch of totals on games that already started and won all of those too. Oh, and of course told us all he's 4-1 already on games that you weren't able to post in time. What kind of degenerate is going to come into this thread, read all of that information, and think to themselves "hmmm, I better not tail any of these remaining games" or "hmmm, I think I'll fade the rest of these plays." Most are going to want to tail after reading all of that info. Why is that so difficult to understand? That's why I said it's irresponsible of you, because you know there are tons of people that will latch on to that info and just blindly tail, not knowing any of BW's intentions when making those bets.
I don't see how that puts me in the same category as these other trolls. I'm simply confused as to what the purpose of this thread was in the first place. It took you 5 pages of this thread before you adamantly stated you weren't playing any of these plays and that tailing anyone picks is stupid and on us. Why not just say that right off the bat? Or better yet, not even post the thread in the first place? Again, you had to have known that the majority of these responses were going to be people questioning your validity, whining, moaning, asking dumb questions, etc. Do you really think anyone took this info and used it the way you were intending them to? And Scal, posting Colin Cowherd's weekly picks are a bit different. Those plays can easily be heard/seen by anyone. It's not every day that you see a thread on here with Billy Walter's bowl picks.
But whatever, just assume I don't know what the heck I'm talking about and spewing nonsense. The truth of the matter is, Papa likes the attention when things he contributes to the forum go well. He disappears or conveniently doesn't have much to say when the info he provides goes poorly. Just look at this thread. You posted BW's plays, had to come back immediately after Game 1 to let us all know that it had won. Then coincidentally, no more game by game updates when the next 3 games lost. It was only until someone made a comment about the plays being 1-3, that Papa magically appeared again to comment (at which point he reminded us all that the earlier plays that he didn't get to post went 3-1 and that Papa would never dare follow any of these plays in the first place). It just all seems so childish. He does the same thing over in the MMA forum as well. He gives us a fight by fight update when his plays are winning and then disappears after he goes 0-11 to finish up the event. The act grows tiresome and I was simply questioning the point of this thread.
This is truly pathetic. 
0
Posted:
#131
Quote Originally Posted by CallingYouOut69:
LOL good lord, you and Scal are acting like I came in here calling you a bunch of names and spewing nonsense. All I said was that this thread seems meaningless, once you clearly stated that you weren't going to play any of BW's picks, nor would you EVER blindly tail someone. You're saying on the one hand, you don't tail anybody's picks blindly. On the other hand, you're telling everyone here to "do what you want" with the info. What info is there really? Just that BW played these plays, the lines are likely long gone, we have no idea if he's actually on these plays or if he intends to hit the other side of the line hard. We don't know any of that. There's also no analysis involved in the picks either.
So think about it. If a viewer comes across this thread, sees that the Great Billy Walters' plays are posted from some inside source, don't you think that most people would want to play those picks? Who the hell is sitting on here thinking to themselves, "Ooooo, Billy Walters is on this team, so I'm going to fade that loser!" Nobody. The only thing that people would do is blindly tail that particular team, or pass on that particular game altogether if they felt strongly about the other side initially. That's it. I'd venture to guess the majority of people would tail. This site is nothing but a bunch of action junkies, looking for the next big tip. What did you expect?
You post BW's picks, claim that you think he hit around 65% on the season, that some of the books might even seek his help in setting lines, and start things off by saying that he also bet a bunch of totals on games that already started and won all of those too. Oh, and of course told us all he's 4-1 already on games that you weren't able to post in time. What kind of degenerate is going to come into this thread, read all of that information, and think to themselves "hmmm, I better not tail any of these remaining games" or "hmmm, I think I'll fade the rest of these plays." Most are going to want to tail after reading all of that info. Why is that so difficult to understand? That's why I said it's irresponsible of you, because you know there are tons of people that will latch on to that info and just blindly tail, not knowing any of BW's intentions when making those bets.
I don't see how that puts me in the same category as these other trolls. I'm simply confused as to what the purpose of this thread was in the first place. It took you 5 pages of this thread before you adamantly stated you weren't playing any of these plays and that tailing anyone picks is stupid and on us. Why not just say that right off the bat? Or better yet, not even post the thread in the first place? Again, you had to have known that the majority of these responses were going to be people questioning your validity, whining, moaning, asking dumb questions, etc. Do you really think anyone took this info and used it the way you were intending them to? And Scal, posting Colin Cowherd's weekly picks are a bit different. Those plays can easily be heard/seen by anyone. It's not every day that you see a thread on here with Billy Walter's bowl picks.
But whatever, just assume I don't know what the heck I'm talking about and spewing nonsense. The truth of the matter is, Papa likes the attention when things he contributes to the forum go well. He disappears or conveniently doesn't have much to say when the info he provides goes poorly. Just look at this thread. You posted BW's plays, had to come back immediately after Game 1 to let us all know that it had won. Then coincidentally, no more game by game updates when the next 3 games lost. It was only until someone made a comment about the plays being 1-3, that Papa magically appeared again to comment (at which point he reminded us all that the earlier plays that he didn't get to post went 3-1 and that Papa would never dare follow any of these plays in the first place). It just all seems so childish. He does the same thing over in the MMA forum as well. He gives us a fight by fight update when his plays are winning and then disappears after he goes 0-11 to finish up the event. The act grows tiresome and I was simply questioning the point of this thread.
LOL good lord, you and Scal are acting like I came in here calling you a bunch of names and spewing nonsense. All I said was that this thread seems meaningless, once you clearly stated that you weren't going to play any of BW's picks, nor would you EVER blindly tail someone. You're saying on the one hand, you don't tail anybody's picks blindly. On the other hand, you're telling everyone here to "do what you want" with the info. What info is there really? Just that BW played these plays, the lines are likely long gone, we have no idea if he's actually on these plays or if he intends to hit the other side of the line hard. We don't know any of that. There's also no analysis involved in the picks either.
So think about it. If a viewer comes across this thread, sees that the Great Billy Walters' plays are posted from some inside source, don't you think that most people would want to play those picks? Who the hell is sitting on here thinking to themselves, "Ooooo, Billy Walters is on this team, so I'm going to fade that loser!" Nobody. The only thing that people would do is blindly tail that particular team, or pass on that particular game altogether if they felt strongly about the other side initially. That's it. I'd venture to guess the majority of people would tail. This site is nothing but a bunch of action junkies, looking for the next big tip. What did you expect?
You post BW's picks, claim that you think he hit around 65% on the season, that some of the books might even seek his help in setting lines, and start things off by saying that he also bet a bunch of totals on games that already started and won all of those too. Oh, and of course told us all he's 4-1 already on games that you weren't able to post in time. What kind of degenerate is going to come into this thread, read all of that information, and think to themselves "hmmm, I better not tail any of these remaining games" or "hmmm, I think I'll fade the rest of these plays." Most are going to want to tail after reading all of that info. Why is that so difficult to understand? That's why I said it's irresponsible of you, because you know there are tons of people that will latch on to that info and just blindly tail, not knowing any of BW's intentions when making those bets.
I don't see how that puts me in the same category as these other trolls. I'm simply confused as to what the purpose of this thread was in the first place. It took you 5 pages of this thread before you adamantly stated you weren't playing any of these plays and that tailing anyone picks is stupid and on us. Why not just say that right off the bat? Or better yet, not even post the thread in the first place? Again, you had to have known that the majority of these responses were going to be people questioning your validity, whining, moaning, asking dumb questions, etc. Do you really think anyone took this info and used it the way you were intending them to? And Scal, posting Colin Cowherd's weekly picks are a bit different. Those plays can easily be heard/seen by anyone. It's not every day that you see a thread on here with Billy Walter's bowl picks.
But whatever, just assume I don't know what the heck I'm talking about and spewing nonsense. The truth of the matter is, Papa likes the attention when things he contributes to the forum go well. He disappears or conveniently doesn't have much to say when the info he provides goes poorly. Just look at this thread. You posted BW's plays, had to come back immediately after Game 1 to let us all know that it had won. Then coincidentally, no more game by game updates when the next 3 games lost. It was only until someone made a comment about the plays being 1-3, that Papa magically appeared again to comment (at which point he reminded us all that the earlier plays that he didn't get to post went 3-1 and that Papa would never dare follow any of these plays in the first place). It just all seems so childish. He does the same thing over in the MMA forum as well. He gives us a fight by fight update when his plays are winning and then disappears after he goes 0-11 to finish up the event. The act grows tiresome and I was simply questioning the point of this thread.
this makes sense to me
0
Posted:
#132
Billy Walters rarely bets multiple bowl games at the same time. Billy bets early or last minute or when ever he can find an edge. Lots of his picks are based on heavy statistical analysis. Billy bets when they hit his magic number. No way he bet all those picks at once. Impossible. I will not be surprised if they end up well under .500 at the end of the day because Billy Waters never picked them, not his style. So Papa your either full of garbage or your source is. Which is it?
0
Posted:
#134
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:
I don't understand the need to jump ugly with the OP. Whether or not it is worthwhile "information", is for each of us to evaluate. As he said in his initial post, do with it what you will.
Either say "thank you" , or shut up.
I don't understand the need to jump ugly with the OP. Whether or not it is worthwhile "information", is for each of us to evaluate. As he said in his initial post, do with it what you will.
Either say "thank you" , or shut up.
Are you going to thank all the garbage information that you will get regardless?
0
Posted:
#136
Quote Originally Posted by gcwrestling08:
i just want to say this one time and hopefully it'll seep into your brain, even though i'm fairly confident you're too weird to take it to heart.
you, my friend, are the definition of cringe. every one of your attention-seeking posts, combined with the way you dramatize everything, is truly nauseating.
you're so utterly cringe-inducing that i physically recoil when i read your posts. it's embarrassing, you're embarrassing yourself.
i know you won't take this seriously and "i'm just another troll," but trust me when i tell you that people in your personal life undoubtedly feel the same way.
and as for Papa, he's also deeply cringeworthy, but his most embarrassing moment came when he tried to act like he got Billy Walters picks on the down low. lolololol
i just want to say this one time and hopefully it'll seep into your brain, even though i'm fairly confident you're too weird to take it to heart.
you, my friend, are the definition of cringe. every one of your attention-seeking posts, combined with the way you dramatize everything, is truly nauseating.
you're so utterly cringe-inducing that i physically recoil when i read your posts. it's embarrassing, you're embarrassing yourself.
i know you won't take this seriously and "i'm just another troll," but trust me when i tell you that people in your personal life undoubtedly feel the same way.
and as for Papa, he's also deeply cringeworthy, but his most embarrassing moment came when he tried to act like he got Billy Walters picks on the down low. lolololol
You keep using this word "cringe" in every post I'm addressed in like it's the only word in your vocabulary. No one has ever said that about me and never will except you. No one even knows what it means. And you continue to say it about me and now others as if anyone cares. Continue on. It's remarkably pathetic but entertaining nonetheless.
"People in my personal life feel the same way".....yes yes you have unique insight to that!!
Continue to "Cringe" at my posts. The more you cringe (and trust me, you're the only one) the more I know my posts are right on target.
0
Posted:
#138
Quote Originally Posted by darien123:
Billy Walters rarely bets multiple bowl games at the same time. Billy bets early or last minute or when ever he can find an edge. Lots of his picks are based on heavy statistical analysis. Billy bets when they hit his magic number. No way he bet all those picks at once. Impossible. I will not be surprised if they end up well under .500 at the end of the day because Billy Waters never picked them, not his style. So Papa your either full of garbage or your source is. Which is it?
lol okay. Another Billy Walters expert with 0 evidence of his own, yet calling me a liar. Makes perfect sense...
0
Posted:
#139
lol I wouldn't have much to say after my last post either, if I were you. I know it's difficult and quite the change of pace if someone actually responds to you with complete sentences and words that are beyond a 3rd grade level. That doesn't mean you have to get bent out of shape and get so defensive. Heaven forbid you be forced to engage in a logical debate, or someone dare have a different point of view than you.
Isn't that the EXACT same thing that's been going on for the past week between you and Scal in his Rousey/Nunes post? Talk about a battle of two guys who can never be wrong about anything. Watching you two go back and forth there is far better than anything that can be found in the movie theaters these days. You both seem to be a bit hypocritical, and neither of you seem to handle any type of criticism or questioning very well. I can understand it must be hard to deal with the majority of idiotic trolls on here, but there are still a few people around that can make some valid points here and there. Being able to listen and comprehend other people's viewpoints is a necessary skill in order to live peacefully once in a while. You should try it sometime.
Isn't that the EXACT same thing that's been going on for the past week between you and Scal in his Rousey/Nunes post? Talk about a battle of two guys who can never be wrong about anything. Watching you two go back and forth there is far better than anything that can be found in the movie theaters these days. You both seem to be a bit hypocritical, and neither of you seem to handle any type of criticism or questioning very well. I can understand it must be hard to deal with the majority of idiotic trolls on here, but there are still a few people around that can make some valid points here and there. Being able to listen and comprehend other people's viewpoints is a necessary skill in order to live peacefully once in a while. You should try it sometime.
0
Posted:
#140
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:
lol okay. Another Billy Walters expert with 0 evidence of his own, yet calling me a liar. Makes perfect sense...
I am no expert on Billy Waters. But if you took the time to watch his 60 minute interview and subsequent interviews you would have realized it is highly unlikely he would bet that many bowl games in advance at the same time or even the same day. Since the events are staggered and a lot of time for line movement. Almost everything is done on a computer very similar to programs that tell you when to sell or buy stocks. Like I said earlier the chances of that happening on so many games at once is next to impossible. If your going to lie Shango at least try to be a good liar and do your research.
0
Posted:
#143
Florida st money line for me. The +7 is unreal. Michigan is so overhyped and now have nothing to play for bc they believe they should be in it for a ring. There superstar will probably fluff it and just try not to get hurt. Harbaugh is still upset about the 4th down call. Seminoles couldn't have a better spot. Also like ksu to beat a&m tomorrow and have a tt over 27. A&m is a joke and those big NFL drafts don't need to show out here. It's all about the combine. Stay healthy and just walk away from a meaningless game for a&m
0
Posted:
#149
Quote Originally Posted by ElKolla733:
You guys have forgotten why we all registered on this site. We all want to share our picks, lets build each other up instead of trying to destroy someone's dignity.
You guys have forgotten why we all registered on this site. We all want to share our picks, lets build each other up instead of trying to destroy someone's dignity.
Covers is full of food critics.
You cook up world class masterpieces and there they are ready to shi+ all over your eye-popping entree by saying squid ink lacks consistency and there's not enough sea urchin purée on the abalone.
Give me a break.
0
Hot Forum Topics
