Thanks for the props but last year I went 22-5 but this year at 12-6, so far, I've spent a ton more time researching and analyzing because of all the "cop-outs and portal potty" players. If things don't improve it will be disappointing. But figuring it out is half the fun and cashing tickets is the other half.
GL
0
@sportschat
Thanks for the props but last year I went 22-5 but this year at 12-6, so far, I've spent a ton more time researching and analyzing because of all the "cop-outs and portal potty" players. If things don't improve it will be disappointing. But figuring it out is half the fun and cashing tickets is the other half.
@sportschat Thanks for the props but last year I went 22-5 but this year at 12-6, so far, I've spent a ton more time researching and analyzing because of all the "cop-outs and portal potty" players. If things don't improve it will be disappointing. But figuring it out is half the fun and cashing tickets is the other half. GL
It is getting to the point where so many players are missing it is absurd. The Tenn vs. Clemson game is a great upcoming example. You are really doing great and making adjustments at the right times. Not to make an excuse as we all win and lose games. I truly believe that if Minnesota did not sit Ibrahim in the 2nd half Minn would have covered. Looking at today's card. It is a complete mess. Best of luck today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gratefulbets:
@sportschat Thanks for the props but last year I went 22-5 but this year at 12-6, so far, I've spent a ton more time researching and analyzing because of all the "cop-outs and portal potty" players. If things don't improve it will be disappointing. But figuring it out is half the fun and cashing tickets is the other half. GL
It is getting to the point where so many players are missing it is absurd. The Tenn vs. Clemson game is a great upcoming example. You are really doing great and making adjustments at the right times. Not to make an excuse as we all win and lose games. I truly believe that if Minnesota did not sit Ibrahim in the 2nd half Minn would have covered. Looking at today's card. It is a complete mess. Best of luck today.
Quote Originally Posted by gratefulbets: Adding TN +4 You are a brave person. I went back and forth on this game and could not find an answer. No play for me. I hope you win.
Yeah, it took me some time until I saw the light. Researching QB backup Milton I saw that he had played a little in the past 7 games going 7-0, 63% PR, 720 yds with a 218 QB Rating! And TN being a dog it fit my dog system plays, so I had to play it.
Also, I bet both Pitt and ND in Vegas before I found that many players on both of those teams, including QBs, were out and that the backup QBs didn't appear to be too good. So that was nice surprise.
ADDING:
Kansas State Wildcats 7.5 -125
TCU Horned Frogs 8 -120
0
Quote Originally Posted by gotime:
Quote Originally Posted by gratefulbets: Adding TN +4 You are a brave person. I went back and forth on this game and could not find an answer. No play for me. I hope you win.
Yeah, it took me some time until I saw the light. Researching QB backup Milton I saw that he had played a little in the past 7 games going 7-0, 63% PR, 720 yds with a 218 QB Rating! And TN being a dog it fit my dog system plays, so I had to play it.
Also, I bet both Pitt and ND in Vegas before I found that many players on both of those teams, including QBs, were out and that the backup QBs didn't appear to be too good. So that was nice surprise.
You're pretty close. I'm surprised that you were able to track all of my plays with so many changes. There's 2 ways to look at these results. Tally all of the original systems plays (28 plays) without regard for players' status, and compare those results to the results of the subjective changes that I posted to the original list of plays, adding and eliminating teams based on players' status.
1) My original system plays listed in post #7, including the 7 teams that had players possibly missing (28 total system picks):
Dogs ATS: 10-4
Dogs SU: 4-2
Favs: 4-4
Total: 18-10
2) System plays altered based on subjective analysis of players' status:
Dogs ATS: 11-2 (I'm counting IL as a system win!)
Dogs SU: 4-3
Favs: 2-6
Total: 17-11 (16-12 with IL as a loss)
From these results the DOGS are the best system plays: 14-6 or 15-5.
0
Quote Originally Posted by doogie43:
16-11 final tally?? Good job!
You're pretty close. I'm surprised that you were able to track all of my plays with so many changes. There's 2 ways to look at these results. Tally all of the original systems plays (28 plays) without regard for players' status, and compare those results to the results of the subjective changes that I posted to the original list of plays, adding and eliminating teams based on players' status.
1) My original system plays listed in post #7, including the 7 teams that had players possibly missing (28 total system picks):
Dogs ATS: 10-4
Dogs SU: 4-2
Favs: 4-4
Total: 18-10
2) System plays altered based on subjective analysis of players' status:
Dogs ATS: 11-2 (I'm counting IL as a system win!)
Dogs SU: 4-3
Favs: 2-6
Total: 17-11 (16-12 with IL as a loss)
From these results the DOGS are the best system plays: 14-6 or 15-5.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.