Colt doesnt play defense,, and Texas would not have put up 35 on Bama D.. its easy to say when You lost your play that it was the wrong side. Bama was favored for a reason, and won, 2nd half they were running clock, texas make a couple big plays, so Bama goes back to game plan, and calls misdirection run, and Playactions, Also, those WR could not get open, and when they did, they were dropping passes that were right in their hands. Colt didnt cause all the penalties. So although Colt would have given them a better chance, we all saw the same thing, and that was Bama dominated 1st half, even with Texas being cute on kickoffs and getting two possessions that were only FG inside the redzone. 2nd half starts and the Bama players do what all teams do when they know they have a team by the throat, they get conservative and kind of just wait for the inevitable to come, which was a Bama win,, Texas was not the right side. Texas D was smoked all night. By the Run, which was what anyone who picked texas would have checked as one of their reasons to take Texas.. But if you would have dug deeper you would have seen that the teams they played were not any good at the run ,, Big 12 stunk this year, trust me I know, I had to watch My Sooners look like crap against them all. So although there is a perfect excuse out there to use for why you may have lost, you can choose to use it or just say hey,, I was wrong. and will get it next year. Unless you are some amazing capper that hits over 85%.. then its okay to be wrong sometimes. Just my take on it,,
0
Colt doesnt play defense,, and Texas would not have put up 35 on Bama D.. its easy to say when You lost your play that it was the wrong side. Bama was favored for a reason, and won, 2nd half they were running clock, texas make a couple big plays, so Bama goes back to game plan, and calls misdirection run, and Playactions, Also, those WR could not get open, and when they did, they were dropping passes that were right in their hands. Colt didnt cause all the penalties. So although Colt would have given them a better chance, we all saw the same thing, and that was Bama dominated 1st half, even with Texas being cute on kickoffs and getting two possessions that were only FG inside the redzone. 2nd half starts and the Bama players do what all teams do when they know they have a team by the throat, they get conservative and kind of just wait for the inevitable to come, which was a Bama win,, Texas was not the right side. Texas D was smoked all night. By the Run, which was what anyone who picked texas would have checked as one of their reasons to take Texas.. But if you would have dug deeper you would have seen that the teams they played were not any good at the run ,, Big 12 stunk this year, trust me I know, I had to watch My Sooners look like crap against them all. So although there is a perfect excuse out there to use for why you may have lost, you can choose to use it or just say hey,, I was wrong. and will get it next year. Unless you are some amazing capper that hits over 85%.. then its okay to be wrong sometimes. Just my take on it,,
please dont swear you know what you are talking about here, injury swayed the whole game,,you know that, dont try and say bama was the right side,,saban is a putz and made bonehead call after bonehead call on the sideline - this guy is a WEASEL
0
please dont swear you know what you are talking about here, injury swayed the whole game,,you know that, dont try and say bama was the right side,,saban is a putz and made bonehead call after bonehead call on the sideline - this guy is a WEASEL
sorry nc1 but the final score says bama was the right side. no matter how much everyone argues texas was the right side, i will keep posting the final was bama-37 texas-21 ------>>>wrong side
0
sorry nc1 but the final score says bama was the right side. no matter how much everyone argues texas was the right side, i will keep posting the final was bama-37 texas-21 ------>>>wrong side
Colt doesnt play defense,, and Texas would not have put up 35 on Bama D..
No but he sure wouldn't have repeated 3 and outs like a true freshman did. Just have a couple of first downs in the 1st half would have saved the UT defense - maybe that means Bama starts on the thier 25 instead of the 50 on the Richardson run. Colts legs were probably good for a couple of 1st downs by themselves.
With 35 seconds left in the 1st half UT doesn't run a shuffle pass but something down the field.
UT behind a true freshman QB put up 21 points.
Losing a kid that has started 50 games and won the most games in NCAA history - not Tim Tebow - wouldn't have an impact on the entire game not just the bama defense or the UT offense but it impacts the entire game.
Maybe UT doesn't win but with 6 minutes to go the score was 24-21 and I would bet bama backers were shittin bricks - you think Colt might have pulled that game out?
0
Quote Originally Posted by investments4you:
Colt doesnt play defense,, and Texas would not have put up 35 on Bama D..
No but he sure wouldn't have repeated 3 and outs like a true freshman did. Just have a couple of first downs in the 1st half would have saved the UT defense - maybe that means Bama starts on the thier 25 instead of the 50 on the Richardson run. Colts legs were probably good for a couple of 1st downs by themselves.
With 35 seconds left in the 1st half UT doesn't run a shuffle pass but something down the field.
UT behind a true freshman QB put up 21 points.
Losing a kid that has started 50 games and won the most games in NCAA history - not Tim Tebow - wouldn't have an impact on the entire game not just the bama defense or the UT offense but it impacts the entire game.
Maybe UT doesn't win but with 6 minutes to go the score was 24-21 and I would bet bama backers were shittin bricks - you think Colt might have pulled that game out?
Bama was sleepwalking in the 2nd half until the last few minutes when they had to turn it on they did and dominated. Ran through Texas. If Colt would have played, Bama would have opened it up, it would have been a different ball game on both sides.
These comments are asinine. It's not like they talked about just running into the line and falling down to kill clock. They were doing their best. If they just wanted to kill the clock, why the f... would they score that last td. You're talking out of your ass. It's over and Texas lost. That's it, but look at everything that went on in the game. bama was far from the superior team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rockytop7:
Bama was sleepwalking in the 2nd half until the last few minutes when they had to turn it on they did and dominated. Ran through Texas. If Colt would have played, Bama would have opened it up, it would have been a different ball game on both sides.
These comments are asinine. It's not like they talked about just running into the line and falling down to kill clock. They were doing their best. If they just wanted to kill the clock, why the f... would they score that last td. You're talking out of your ass. It's over and Texas lost. That's it, but look at everything that went on in the game. bama was far from the superior team.
Colt doesnt play defense,, and Texas would not have put up 35 on Bama D.. its easy to say when You lost your play that it was the wrong side. Bama was favored for a reason, and won, 2nd half they were running clock, texas make a couple big plays, so Bama goes back to game plan, and calls misdirection run, and Playactions, Also, those WR could not get open, and when they did, they were dropping passes that were right in their hands. Colt didnt cause all the penalties. So although Colt would have given them a better chance, we all saw the same thing, and that was Bama dominated 1st half, even with Texas being cute on kickoffs and getting two possessions that were only FG inside the redzone. 2nd half starts and the Bama players do what all teams do when they know they have a team by the throat, they get conservative and kind of just wait for the inevitable to come, which was a Bama win,, Texas was not the right side. Texas D was smoked all night. By the Run, which was what anyone who picked texas would have checked as one of their reasons to take Texas.. But if you would have dug deeper you would have seen that the teams they played were not any good at the run ,, Big 12 stunk this year, trust me I know, I had to watch My Sooners look like crap against them all. So although there is a perfect excuse out there to use for why you may have lost, you can choose to use it or just say hey,, I was wrong. and will get it next year. Unless you are some amazing capper that hits over 85%.. then its okay to be wrong sometimes. Just my take on it,,
your take is wrong if think colt would have threw 3 picks and one to a d lineman with 15 secs left in the 2nd quarter your wrong texas would have won with colt and everone knows it. if a fucking shitty ass backup freshman can come back within 3. the last drive with 4 min left would of been a td with colt game over texas wins alabama d got exposed they werent shit and as for saying alabama was running the ball 2nd half to kill clock your wrong they been running the ball the whole game
0
Quote Originally Posted by investments4you:
Colt doesnt play defense,, and Texas would not have put up 35 on Bama D.. its easy to say when You lost your play that it was the wrong side. Bama was favored for a reason, and won, 2nd half they were running clock, texas make a couple big plays, so Bama goes back to game plan, and calls misdirection run, and Playactions, Also, those WR could not get open, and when they did, they were dropping passes that were right in their hands. Colt didnt cause all the penalties. So although Colt would have given them a better chance, we all saw the same thing, and that was Bama dominated 1st half, even with Texas being cute on kickoffs and getting two possessions that were only FG inside the redzone. 2nd half starts and the Bama players do what all teams do when they know they have a team by the throat, they get conservative and kind of just wait for the inevitable to come, which was a Bama win,, Texas was not the right side. Texas D was smoked all night. By the Run, which was what anyone who picked texas would have checked as one of their reasons to take Texas.. But if you would have dug deeper you would have seen that the teams they played were not any good at the run ,, Big 12 stunk this year, trust me I know, I had to watch My Sooners look like crap against them all. So although there is a perfect excuse out there to use for why you may have lost, you can choose to use it or just say hey,, I was wrong. and will get it next year. Unless you are some amazing capper that hits over 85%.. then its okay to be wrong sometimes. Just my take on it,,
your take is wrong if think colt would have threw 3 picks and one to a d lineman with 15 secs left in the 2nd quarter your wrong texas would have won with colt and everone knows it. if a fucking shitty ass backup freshman can come back within 3. the last drive with 4 min left would of been a td with colt game over texas wins alabama d got exposed they werent shit and as for saying alabama was running the ball 2nd half to kill clock your wrong they been running the ball the whole game
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.