Monstars it didn't work out but a bunch of weird things happened for them not to cover, that's gambling. If that game is played 10 times Memphis covers at the minimum 6. No excuses, good job Houston backers you got the win.
0
Monstars it didn't work out but a bunch of weird things happened for them not to cover, that's gambling. If that game is played 10 times Memphis covers at the minimum 6. No excuses, good job Houston backers you got the win.
You guys need to stop with the 70 pts a game nonsense like it means anything.
But lets get to the real reason why I think they cover. It has nothing to do with being a hero, sharp, contrarian nonsense. One of the most important things I look for is line value and whether the open is strong or weak. The open was fairly weak and no line at this point holds more value. When CFB lines (I'm not talking about low interest games in small conf.) move over 4 points the move loses far more than wins because value has quickly shifted. Don't really take the BetOnline opens serious but at -10.5 it's a reasonable number and opened there for a reason. For it to jump so much shows at how different the odds makers and gamblers feel about this one.
The most important thing I look for is trying to find a team on a much higher emotional plane and the opponent to be flat. The former is covered but the latter maybe not.
Three things I look for when I bet a game are all covered. This is why I had to bite at 17.5.
All very well said and excellent reasoning. The only thing I'd add is that I think that in situations with big line moves like what happened here you can use it as a tool to see if there is a lot of value in the underdog. Bookmakers may have been hit by sharp money at -10.5 but they were not getting sharp money on K-State as the line eased up all the way to -18 and definitely not sharp money on Baylor at anything other than -10.5. This gives the bookmakers good feedback that they shouldn't be worried about the Baylor action and provides the public with reassurance that Baylor is the right pick.
This logic would tell you that K-State was not a really strong play as the bookmakers and sharps knew Baylor to win the game but that there was not a lot of value on either side with the points. (A TD flipping to either side which could happen easily like Ohio St against NW last week good blow it and could have happened).
Opposite thing happened in the Texas/OU game. Line opened at 11.5 and went to 14 (pretty significant move) and stayed their all week. Saturday AM right before kickoff it had moved back to 11.5, clear indication that the value was on Texas (probably some inside information).
A hell of a pick and I respect your capping greatly. Your thoughts are welcome.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
You guys need to stop with the 70 pts a game nonsense like it means anything.
But lets get to the real reason why I think they cover. It has nothing to do with being a hero, sharp, contrarian nonsense. One of the most important things I look for is line value and whether the open is strong or weak. The open was fairly weak and no line at this point holds more value. When CFB lines (I'm not talking about low interest games in small conf.) move over 4 points the move loses far more than wins because value has quickly shifted. Don't really take the BetOnline opens serious but at -10.5 it's a reasonable number and opened there for a reason. For it to jump so much shows at how different the odds makers and gamblers feel about this one.
The most important thing I look for is trying to find a team on a much higher emotional plane and the opponent to be flat. The former is covered but the latter maybe not.
Three things I look for when I bet a game are all covered. This is why I had to bite at 17.5.
All very well said and excellent reasoning. The only thing I'd add is that I think that in situations with big line moves like what happened here you can use it as a tool to see if there is a lot of value in the underdog. Bookmakers may have been hit by sharp money at -10.5 but they were not getting sharp money on K-State as the line eased up all the way to -18 and definitely not sharp money on Baylor at anything other than -10.5. This gives the bookmakers good feedback that they shouldn't be worried about the Baylor action and provides the public with reassurance that Baylor is the right pick.
This logic would tell you that K-State was not a really strong play as the bookmakers and sharps knew Baylor to win the game but that there was not a lot of value on either side with the points. (A TD flipping to either side which could happen easily like Ohio St against NW last week good blow it and could have happened).
Opposite thing happened in the Texas/OU game. Line opened at 11.5 and went to 14 (pretty significant move) and stayed their all week. Saturday AM right before kickoff it had moved back to 11.5, clear indication that the value was on Texas (probably some inside information).
A hell of a pick and I respect your capping greatly. Your thoughts are welcome.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.