What # was LK on USC's list? PC bailed, Riley turned you down, then Sark said no, Del Rio wanted no part.
so im guessing the conversation among the faculty at USC went something like this "PC bolted on us and the first 4 guys we wanted all turned us down. So who's dumb enough to come take this?" everyone looks at Mike Garrett...his response, "ill get on the phone with Kiffin"
You say this like its a bad thing to be turned down by Riley or Del Rio. Sark was never approached. I understnad why Riley said no. He has job security for years in Corvallis. Del Rio? Why would he turn down $5 mil per for the next 3 years when USC would give him no more than 3 per? No brainer. Fisher? Getting turned down by him is no insult. He'd turn Bama down.
So how bad was it for USC to be turned down by them? They didnt get turned down by assistants or guys who were coaching Duke.
Kiffin would have been high on their list if they would have known Kiffin was coming. For some reason, the media here is saying Kiffin came to USC and said what about me? Garrett didnt even think about considering him. Its the same with Sark. They didnt think he'd come. If they had ask, maybe he would. But I think Sark would have said no.
If you think he was the last resort, you're a fool. They wanted this done as fast as possible to keep the recruits on hand, like Prater.
I think USC admin was counting on Chow too. It took a little sting out of the hire. I thought he would be a package deal.
The head coach is the CEO. You're only as good as who you have surrounding you. I think we can say he has a great staff.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DaimondD:
What # was LK on USC's list? PC bailed, Riley turned you down, then Sark said no, Del Rio wanted no part.
so im guessing the conversation among the faculty at USC went something like this "PC bolted on us and the first 4 guys we wanted all turned us down. So who's dumb enough to come take this?" everyone looks at Mike Garrett...his response, "ill get on the phone with Kiffin"
You say this like its a bad thing to be turned down by Riley or Del Rio. Sark was never approached. I understnad why Riley said no. He has job security for years in Corvallis. Del Rio? Why would he turn down $5 mil per for the next 3 years when USC would give him no more than 3 per? No brainer. Fisher? Getting turned down by him is no insult. He'd turn Bama down.
So how bad was it for USC to be turned down by them? They didnt get turned down by assistants or guys who were coaching Duke.
Kiffin would have been high on their list if they would have known Kiffin was coming. For some reason, the media here is saying Kiffin came to USC and said what about me? Garrett didnt even think about considering him. Its the same with Sark. They didnt think he'd come. If they had ask, maybe he would. But I think Sark would have said no.
If you think he was the last resort, you're a fool. They wanted this done as fast as possible to keep the recruits on hand, like Prater.
I think USC admin was counting on Chow too. It took a little sting out of the hire. I thought he would be a package deal.
The head coach is the CEO. You're only as good as who you have surrounding you. I think we can say he has a great staff.
You say this like its a bad thing to be turned down by Riley or Del Rio. Sark was never approached. I understnad why Riley said no. He has job security for years in Corvallis. Del Rio? Why would he turn down $5 mil per for the next 3 years when USC would give him no more than 3 per? No brainer. Fisher? Getting turned down by him is no insult. He'd turn Bama down.
So how bad was it for USC to be turned down by them? They didnt get turned down by assistants or guys who were coaching Duke.
Kiffin would have been high on their list if they would have known Kiffin was coming. For some reason, the media here is saying Kiffin came to USC and said what about me? Garrett didnt even think about considering him. Its the same with Sark. They didnt think he'd come. If they had ask, maybe he would. But I think Sark would have said no.
If you think he was the last resort, you're a fool. They wanted this done as fast as possible to keep the recruits on hand, like Prater.
I think USC admin was counting on Chow too. It took a little sting out of the hire. I thought he would be a package deal.
The head coach is the CEO. You're only as good as who you have surrounding you. I think we can say he has a great staff.
i told you not to drink the kool aid......
0
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan:
You say this like its a bad thing to be turned down by Riley or Del Rio. Sark was never approached. I understnad why Riley said no. He has job security for years in Corvallis. Del Rio? Why would he turn down $5 mil per for the next 3 years when USC would give him no more than 3 per? No brainer. Fisher? Getting turned down by him is no insult. He'd turn Bama down.
So how bad was it for USC to be turned down by them? They didnt get turned down by assistants or guys who were coaching Duke.
Kiffin would have been high on their list if they would have known Kiffin was coming. For some reason, the media here is saying Kiffin came to USC and said what about me? Garrett didnt even think about considering him. Its the same with Sark. They didnt think he'd come. If they had ask, maybe he would. But I think Sark would have said no.
If you think he was the last resort, you're a fool. They wanted this done as fast as possible to keep the recruits on hand, like Prater.
I think USC admin was counting on Chow too. It took a little sting out of the hire. I thought he would be a package deal.
The head coach is the CEO. You're only as good as who you have surrounding you. I think we can say he has a great staff.
Why are the Trojan fans not worried about sanctions? We've been following this for 5 years. Up to this point, nothing has pointed to the program itself. I have to hear USC was directly involved. Thats why if anything, they will get punished for lack of institutional control.
Why are we happy to have Kiffin? Because we know him. He's been here during the good times and is proven. I dont like him as the head coach, but I like the fact that he's bringing Ed Orgeron, Poppa Kiffin, and Tim Davis. The head coach is only as good as his staff. This staff is great.
I dont expect anyone outside of the Trojan family to understand the excitement, but we know whats going on, and considering the fact that we lose PC, this was the next best step. Everyones familiar with him, INCLUDING the players, which is most important. The players cant wait because there's no uncertainty.
you are happy about getting the staff that got their asses handed to them by Virginia Tech?
whose best performance was losing to alabama?
How can kiffin control the ego's in the locker room when his is the biggest?
I'd be over the moon with the hiring of a coach who is 12-22. For USC fans to be happy that 12-22 record is going to have to be at least 500 by the end of next season.
You ae either delusional, brainwashed or bias. Probably all 3
0
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan:
Why are the Trojan fans not worried about sanctions? We've been following this for 5 years. Up to this point, nothing has pointed to the program itself. I have to hear USC was directly involved. Thats why if anything, they will get punished for lack of institutional control.
Why are we happy to have Kiffin? Because we know him. He's been here during the good times and is proven. I dont like him as the head coach, but I like the fact that he's bringing Ed Orgeron, Poppa Kiffin, and Tim Davis. The head coach is only as good as his staff. This staff is great.
I dont expect anyone outside of the Trojan family to understand the excitement, but we know whats going on, and considering the fact that we lose PC, this was the next best step. Everyones familiar with him, INCLUDING the players, which is most important. The players cant wait because there's no uncertainty.
you are happy about getting the staff that got their asses handed to them by Virginia Tech?
whose best performance was losing to alabama?
How can kiffin control the ego's in the locker room when his is the biggest?
I'd be over the moon with the hiring of a coach who is 12-22. For USC fans to be happy that 12-22 record is going to have to be at least 500 by the end of next season.
You ae either delusional, brainwashed or bias. Probably all 3
Loyality means nothing these days, its all about show me the money. You wait an see, USC will turn on him in a second, if the W's go away, and schools will think twice about taking a chance with this guy, knowing he will leave on the next offer on the table. Pretty shity move on his part, but how many of us would make the same choice, if given???
0
Loyality means nothing these days, its all about show me the money. You wait an see, USC will turn on him in a second, if the W's go away, and schools will think twice about taking a chance with this guy, knowing he will leave on the next offer on the table. Pretty shity move on his part, but how many of us would make the same choice, if given???
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.