Posted:
#76
[Quote: Originally Posted by Pecador]
BA, the last GOY I've played was N. Dame -7 @ B. C. After reading B. Connelly's take on both teams and the fact he thinks S&P makes N. Dame -14, I'm counting on the spread to rise by game time. N. Dame has best players all over the place. I wouldn't think to many let down games for the Irish ( especially early) with all the close losses last year.
Irish off Georgia / Sparty on deck......BC beat WF LY (+3)....so no shocker if they lose to Wake TY (week before ND)
* so Irish off physical game with Georgia.....with a look-a-head (for them) vs Sparty.....laying 7 on the road to .BC..... off loss?.....with Clemson on deck........bad spot for BC no doubt.....but they usually play ND tough......
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
0
............................
C'mon BA..........Just said most trends are useless......Dont blindly follow them.....Too many other things to consider.....would you bet on a team because of a trend if you could not connect any strategical reasoning as to why the trend exists?....I dont think you would...There are trends that have value, that are real........My point was Marc Lawrence prints too many of the random useless ones.....I dont reject new capping ideas.....Just the opposite as Im always trying to get better....I apply fundamentals (matchups, talent)
Hot Forum Topics
