All Forums | College Football

Ok state would have put up 30 by now on either team

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7213
Posts: 172
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1186
Posted: #1

We already saw this yawner.  Hate no playoffs in CFB Div 1. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1077
Posted: #2
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 12073
Posted: #3

dumbest shit i ever heard.....

 

okie st would come within two tds of either team

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #4
And would have given up 65
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

And would have given up 65
Bama couldnt score 65 on a team with 3 defensive players
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #6
but yeah this shit sucks once again. Unreal. At least college basketball is getting going
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 271
Posted: #7
was just gonna post the same thing....fuck toledo  norther illinios   oregon  all would have 14 by now
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #8

LSU held Oregon to 20....Ok st wouldnt get 3 tds....

Its alittle different when the QB doesnt have 10 seconds to throw and people catch the ball without a player within 10 yards of him

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1219
Posted: #9

Boise ST. would put 14 already..!

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by spacer1:

was just gonna post the same thing....fuck toledo  norther illinios   oregon  all would have 14 by now

 

Oregon scored 20 on LSU in 3 qtrs and 1130 minutes....

Now all of a sudden they would have 14 already??

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 12073
Posted: #11

alabama defense wouldnt allow more than 17 to any team in the country in top 25...

LSU might have given 10 up to some teams but there team tightens up deeper in game

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 4295
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by payne034:

dumbest shit i ever heard.....

 

okie st would come within two tds of either team


 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

LSU held Oregon to 20....Ok st wouldnt get 3 tds....

Its alittle different when the QB doesnt have 10 seconds to throw and people catch the ball without a player within 10 yards of him

And its easier to defend offenses that have complete scrubs at qb and avg wrs. Works both ways.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 2859
Posted: #14
Amazing at how dumb some people are on here.  OKST wouldnt even hit DD all game long
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 271
Posted: #15
spread em out and fire
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

Oregon scored 20 on LSU in 3 qtrs and 1130 minutes....

Now all of a sudden they would have 14 already??

Ill take oregons chances again. It was 40-27 by the way although there may have been a special teams or defensive score but oregon did have 27
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 12073
Posted: #17
richardson would have already 100 yards on most defenses but it will take him four quarters to get his against lsu
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #18

K ST put up 45 on OK St.....

Arkansas, the 3rd worst defense in the SEC held them to 16....

People might mock the offense in the SEC, but they are playing NFL "quality" type defenses....

Only the SEC has a defense like this...

Its easy to say things when no other team knows how to hold a team under 20, 30 even 40 points

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2003
Posts: 8346
Posted: #19
Boise would have already won the game with 7 total points.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3712
Posted: #20
i dont think the cowboys would win against either of these teams, but ti would have been nice to see what their offense could have done...although bama would likely run it right down their throats with richardson
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 302
Posted: #21
I was just saying the same thing. It should have been Okie state!!! This game sucks balls!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #22

Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13:

Ill take oregons chances again. It was 40-27 by the way although there may have been a special teams or defensive score but oregon did have 27

 

Oregon scored a td with 7 seconds left against prevent defense in a blowout...I dont count that as scoring on LSU when they had 5 guys deep every play

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #23

Quote Originally Posted by payne034:

richardson would have already 100 yards on most defenses but it will take him four quarters to get his against lsu

 

Exactly....in the BIg 12 you run 13 yds before contact

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1871
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by dking041966:

We already saw this yawner.  Hate no playoffs in CFB Div 1. 

You are an absolute moron. This is by far the 2 best teams in CFB, if you don't like watching two unbelievable teams beat the living sh*t out of each other then go watching your dancing with the stars.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1077
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

 

Oregon scored a td with 7 seconds left against prevent defense in a blowout...I dont count that as scoring on LSU when they had 5 guys deep every play



that was the first game of the year. its safe to say oregons offfense got going. and lsu's still hasnt.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.