All Forums | College Football

Oregon is going to lose at Washington next week.

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10208
Posts: 119
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:



books will get 50% Oregon money at anything below 28.



And this statement confirms my previous statement... 

If Oregon was listed at (-28), casinos would get obliterated with UW money... no idea where you came up with this!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by ceveche88:

UW has a great shot to win, but I will play it safe and take the points. Huskies are for real, they played a very sloppy game and still almost won against stanford, Home field will make the difference.   Im with you motowner


gl sir
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:

I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa.  This is the exact thread gridironguy would post.  And, if you look at the post histories

Last 2 weeks in Sept, a million posts for GIG and none for motowner

Then, Oct 1 to today, no posts for GIG and a million posts for motowner

And now this thread?  What are the odds?



you have nothing intelligent to say, so you just troll instead?

you're pathetic.

get lost.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:



And this statement confirms my previous statement... 

If Oregon was listed at (-28), casinos would get obliterated with UW money... no idea where you came up with this!


no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.

whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.

the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!

squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.

sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:

I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa.  This is the exact thread gridironguy would post.  And, if you look at the post histories

Last 2 weeks in Sept, a million posts for GIG and none for motowner

Then, Oct 1 to today, no posts for GIG and a million posts for motowner

And now this thread?  What are the odds?



also, how stupid are you troll boy?

my join date was Oct 2012, not 2013..

again, GTFO troll!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 104
Posted: #56

Let's all agee....take the OVER!   lol   Motowner does have a valid opinion.  Washington outplayed Stanford but special teams doomed them.  I just think it's a tough situation for a Washington team to have to play a team caliber of Oregon after a physical contest against Stanford the week before..

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by cherokee10:


This x 1000000


wow you really are dumb. 

i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.

he is obviously an oregon duck hater.

if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them.  NO WAY.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 4585
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:



wow you really are dumb. 

i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.

he is obviously an oregon duck hater.

if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them.  NO WAY.

Gotcha, I'm 100% convinced now after that explanation.

Since you feel good about the situation, maybe create another thread about it? Maybe?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #59
in a large group of posters, there are chances that some posters might sound similar.  it's called the human condition.

people are more similar than they are different, but i don't expect you to know that.

p.s. enjoy this little streak ohio state is on because if you're lucky enough to get to the bcs title game you're gona get smacked.

4 close games vs lesser foes LY and then last night's game.

flukiest 18 gm run i've ever seen.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 104
Posted: #60
I'm sticking with my opinion on the game, but Gridironguy, you probably was popping off on here last year saying the same thing about Stanford not having a chance against Oregon.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #61
no i did not.  i never said Stanford could not beat Oregon LY.  Stanford is built perfectly to potentially beat Oregon, but not Wash.  they played well last night but they do not have enough firepower to keep up with Oregon.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:



wow you really are dumb. 

i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.

he is obviously an oregon duck hater.

if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them.  NO WAY.


nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.

all this "NO WAY Oregon loses" nonsense is the textbook definition of simpleton, lazy thinking.

there was also "NO WAY" Oregon was going to lose in any of their prior 6+ seasons and every time like clockwork they DID.

so just give it a rest already.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #63
i never said they would not lose the past 6 years.

you are doing the classic case of picking against a super hot team the first chance you get.

the truth is that in january 2011 i bet undefeated auburn over oregon.

it's about knowing WHEN to bet against a super hot team.

the time to bet AGAINST oregon is much more likely when they go to Stanford or if they host the pac 12 title game because it will be cold as hell in eugene that night.

just USC beat oregon in autzen in the cold of november 2011, and stanford last yr in autzen, the best time to beat oregon is when it's really cold or if you have a strong SEC team against them like Auburn was in 2010 (bcs title game jan 2011).

Wash is going to enter this track-meet without the proper horses.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 104
Posted: #64
Gridironguy, if you knew me, you would know that I have said in the past that Ohio State has a pathetic schedule and any SEC team or Oregon with one loss deserves to be considered in BCS title game over an undefeated Ohio State.  Osu has to schedule one or two top tier non-conference games plus win them to be in that top tier, along with the rest of the Big 10.  As of for the next few years, they are stuck playing these pathetic schedules due to they are agreed upon 5 years in advance.  Hopefully it will be a wake up call for OSU and the rest of the Big 10 atheletic directors, etc....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #65
go ahead and bet Wash ML if you want, and then go watch your money get pisssed down the drain.

Wash 'might' cover 14, but they are not winning this game unless Mariota gets hurt and taken out of the game.

you wana place your bets based on chances of injury?

be my guest and go lose then.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 104
Posted: #66
Gridironguy, go to sleep. It's past your bedtime. Motowner has a valid point in what he's saying but your only comeback is attacking him and me. Mama is calling, go to bed before mama takes away your TV time and then you will not be able to watch Oregon-Washington at all.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #67
Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.

14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.

14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them.  obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret.  he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.

well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 104
Posted: #68

i posted oregon would pull away and win big, but i'm not going to attack people on here because their opinion differs from mine.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:



no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.

whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.

the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!

squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.

sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.



First, you are a little friggin kid!  I have literally been gambling on college football since you were sperm!!!  

Second, I have made no wager on this game, and have not made any claim that I would... so don't friggin presume your stupid behind has the first friggin clue what I would do!

Thirdly, the fact that the statement in RED was correct, has absolutely no correlation to the veracity of the statement in BLUE... which is, regardless of anything that happens with THIS line... a bunch of BULLSHIT!


You don't have a friggin clue... you're just another friggin mouth on this website whose biggest claim to game (BY FAR) is that it is home to the stupidest population of human beings on the planet!


Would you like to run for President, fool!?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.

14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.

14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them.  obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret.  he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.

well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.


do you know how dumb that sounds? not only is that not true, but if there truly were a "zillion" people thinking oregon will lose this week.. then where are they? and why aren't they voting that way with their wallets at the windows?

instead, the reality is.. there are a "bagillion gazillion quatrillion" amount of people who think oregon not only wins this week, but covers the pointspread.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:



nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.


This coming from the idiot who substitutes the term "SQUARE" in place of anything remotely substantive...


Congrats on somehow managing to expose your complete idiocy in only 3 pages of this thread!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #72
Be very clear!

I am not bashing your play... I am bashing (1) your bullshit claims about the line... (2) your bullshit rhetoric in which you call anyone who presents any line of reasoning that opposes yours, a "SQUARE"... (3) and your general dipshit attitude!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 104
Posted: #73
LOL,  eveyone bet the OVER and call it a night
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #74
Don't worry... I will be sure to never pay attention to anything you post ever again!


 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:



First, you are a little friggin kid!  I have literally been gambling on college football since you were sperm!!!  

Second, I have made no wager on this game, and have not made any claim that I would... so don't friggin presume your stupid behind has the first friggin clue what I would do!

Thirdly, the fact that the statement in RED was correct, has absolutely no correlation to the veracity of the statement in BLUE... which is, regardless of anything that happens with THIS line... a bunch of BULLSHIT!


You don't have a friggin clue... you're just another friggin mouth on this website whose biggest claim to game (BY FAR) is that it is home to the stupidest population of human beings on the planet!


Would you like to run for President, fool!?


oh the tough talk! son, you're a typical square with a big mouth and have been proven wrong countless times already. far worse, you offer nothing analytical to this discussion and are wasting my time. i'm done making you look like a fool, now run along.

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.