All Forums | College Football

Oregon is going to lose at Washington next week.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10208
Posts: 119
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 104
Posted: #76

Obviously this ICE4Blood clown loses alot. Someone to post on here bragging about how long they have been betting on games definitely isn't winning, probably sitting in his parents' basement  if he actually was, he wouldn't be posting on this site along with the rest of us, in your words, so-called idiots. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by bucknutsfla:

Obviously this ICE4Blood clown loses alot. Someone to post on here bragging about how long they have been betting on games definitely isn't winning, probably sitting in his parents' basement  if he actually was, he wouldn't be posting on this site along with the rest of us, in your words, so-called idiots. 



I post all of my plays... quite easy to verify my 26-16 (62%) record... and that comes after by far my work week of the season... 

In fact, every CFB bet for the past several years can be verified on this very website...


Rule #1 of covers:  Just cuz you say it, doesn't make it true!  You can call me a square, tell me I lose... say I'm a friggin vampire... but no matter how much you say it, the truth stands on it's own... and so does my track record in CFB!

You would be wise to pay attention... but you won't!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #78
Regardless of any of that... I have been around here long enough to know this:

When someone throws the term "SQUARE" at every person who suggests they aren't a genius... those are NOT people who tend to give valuable advice on a consistent basis... they are just attention-seekers, by and large... or people who are very very new to this game... it's simplistic thinking, and simplistic thinking does not equate to success in sportsbetting!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 858
Posted: #79
All the squares already loading up on Oregon. I think Washington has a legit chance to win SU but I'll gladly take the points. Think it'll hit 17.5 so I'll wait. Public will drive it up much more
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by TopNotchKata:

All the squares already loading up on Oregon. I think Washington has a legit chance to win SU but I'll gladly take the points. Think it'll hit 17.5 so I'll wait. Public will drive it up much more


based on how good Wash looked on natl TV last night vs Stanford, i do not believe this line will go north of 15.5,

i will be stunned if it touches 17.

if keith price's thumb is reported as injured as it looked last night v Stanford in the 4th quarter, then the line might shoot past 17,

otherwise, i see 15.5 tops.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 2008
Posted: #81
squares are hitting 67% this season
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 3546
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:

reasons:

- Washington has a top 2 HFA in conference.

- Washington has a top 2 defense in conference.

- Washington has a top 2 running game in conference.

- Washington has great TE's and a play action pass game.

- Washington is not a finesse team.

- Oregon is a finesse team.

- Oregon has played absolutely no one, thus ripe for the taking.

Pretty bold statement there sir.  Washington is pretty good.  Best of luck!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 1442
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

Wash cannot beat Oregon. True this is their most experienced team in years, and they stuck with Price and they expected great things. Nice stadium, too. Good team that didn't get breaks. They will play well, but wont get close to Oregon on the scoreboard.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 2909
Posted: #84


only question here is.. will Huskies be mentally ok after this crushing loss?

[/Quote]

  My play on Or -13 says no.  They are too exhausted.  But I am an idiot...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 152
Posted: #85
The Fuskies have a decent chance to cover the 2 td spread but the ducks win by 21+ IMO.....

I'm obviously biased here but I don't think the country has seen a focused Oregon squad yet, because they could have run their backups out every game so far and still won. And trust me when I say that we wont overlook the dawgs, who is historically probably our most despised rivals not based in Corvallis.

 Ducks play their best game of the year so far and the hype will continue to build.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 4807
Posted: #86
I like the huskies plus the points 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 6618
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by goducks4:

The Fuskies have a decent chance to cover the 2 td spread but the ducks win by 21+ IMO.....

I'm obviously biased here but I don't think the country has seen a focused Oregon squad yet, because they could have run their backups out every game so far and still won. And trust me when I say that we wont overlook the dawgs, who is historically probably our most despised rivals not based in Corvallis.

 Ducks play their best game of the year so far and the hype will continue to build.


you guys are definitely lucky to be catching the huskies after their heart breaking loss to stanford.. a game they dominated statistically and should've won by 14+. if you guys beat the huskies, you'll run the table and play Bama.

revenge against stanford will be easy for you guys, they're nothing like the team they were LY. their running game has fallen off quite a bit, QB is slow and mediocre, and they have no big play potential on the outside either. defense is overrated.

as for UCLA, their defense is way too young and they have no running game. those are the 2 things you need to beat Oregon, so they'll have no chance against you guys. heck, they should've been blown out by Utah if not for 6 INT's. you'll probably have to play them again in the conference champ game, which will be another pointless game. the Pac 12 South is an utter disaster, they should just cancel the CCG until further notice.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 155
Posted: #88
Huck the Fuskies

Go Ducks!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #89

Weird. Line went from -14 to -13.5.  Who's betting on Washington now?   Wouldn't most sharps think that the public will be hammering Oregon, no matter how "good" Washington looked vs Stanford?

OP's prediction is worthless.  His analysis on Oregon is "they've played no one good yet."  Huh?  Care to explain how their defense still looks terrific. 

Lose, and he'll disappear and no one will care.  Win, and he'll gloat incessantly.  BFD.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 37891
Posted: #90

PLAYED NOBODY

TENNESSEE ALMOST AND SHOULD HAVE WON AGAINST GEORGIA.............A TOP TEN TEAM

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 2674
Posted: #91
I don't project them losing, but I am working on calculations as I speak about the cover. Should have a percentage before game day.
Pura Vida
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 2998
Posted: #92
Washington can play with Oregon. The spread is out of whack.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 174
Posted: #93
After the game you will be one of the following;

1. Genius for picking Washington (but you need to post your ticket and not just talk)

2. Fool for betting against the ducks who don't even play their starters for the last quarters 

I tend to think its a big call but if Washington wins then I would sprinkle something on UK to beat Alabama, after all these 2 teams did lose their first games last year in the same week
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1182
Posted: #94
Hey jdn wasup buddy, i got to say ive earned alot of respect for you the last few weeks as you been backing up everything you said and are having a great season. Good job sir keep ul the good work. Btw i posted a thread titled important question. Maybe you ca help me on my question as i thinm u haveplenty of knowledge and experience in this industry
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 137
Posted: #95
Oregon: 55
Wash: 17

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 83
Posted: #96
Washington is coming off that heart-breaking loss to Stanford. You think they are ready to run with Oregon?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #97
washington did not lead in the 2nd half so i won't call the loss at stanford heartbreaking.

what i will say is that when they have to defend the ducks on saturday, what they do experience will be disheartening and back breaking.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 95
Posted: #98

Quote Originally Posted by BandosWB:



  My play on Or -13 says no.  They are too exhausted.  But I am an idiot...
  

LOL What??   The starters sit whole 2nd half every game, the cal game they sat everybody halfway into 2nd qtr.  Exhausted?? They could not be any more rested.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25473
Posted: #99
Motowner--

I like some of the things I've read from you during this season, I'm not taking sides in this fight as I don't care, what I will do is 100% tell you that ICE is not close to a square, he's top 5 on this site for college football, he knows his stuff



.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

Motowner--

I like some of the things I've read from you during this season, I'm not taking sides in this fight as I don't care, what I will do is 100% tell you that ICE is not close to a square, he's top 5 on this site for college football, he knows his stuff





Back atcha!  I really should ignore the attention-grabbers, but sometimes I get bored...

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.