I'm already on SC, and put a gun to my head, I'd be on the opposite side of the other three
I'm already on SC, and put a gun to my head, I'd be on the opposite side of the other three
I'm not sure the interim, any other coach, or a genie from a bottle is going to all of a sudden have the Clemson OL blocking an NFL caliber D-Line. I'm definitely still going to be on GT as well
I'm not sure the interim, any other coach, or a genie from a bottle is going to all of a sudden have the Clemson OL blocking an NFL caliber D-Line. I'm definitely still going to be on GT as well
Not likely to happen, as Dick has 2 more Ints than TD so far this year, with 7 and 5, respectively.
Also, dyounger, Michael Smith RB at Arkansas is a Junior. Not a big deal, but just in case your were looking for his name on the All-SEC freshman team ballot or something.
Not likely to happen, as Dick has 2 more Ints than TD so far this year, with 7 and 5, respectively.
Also, dyounger, Michael Smith RB at Arkansas is a Junior. Not a big deal, but just in case your were looking for his name on the All-SEC freshman team ballot or something.
The only person I ever bash DY is me. I'm ulitamely responsible for the bets I place, not someone else. So why would I bash someone else for idiotic bets I make? Moreover, I see no benefactor in doing so. How would bashing you or anyone else help me win more bets?
Be that as it may, you make a very lucid argument for Georgia this week. One thing you point out that I didn't realize, is that Vandy has eclipsed the 100-yard passing mark only once all season. With that in mind, it's rather remarkable what the 'Dores have accomplished so far this year. And even though he has a girl's name, I think they'd be more effective throwing the ball if they just stick with McKenzie Adams. He is clearly the better passer, and the team just seems to be more confident when he's behind center.
Nevertheless, your persuasive argument for the Bulldogs notwithstanding, I still don't see any value in laying a +2 TD spread with Georgia. You're probably right as you were with Florida last week, but I just don't think I could pull the trigger on Georgia here.
buddy!!!
FREAK OUT!!!
The only person I ever bash DY is me. I'm ulitamely responsible for the bets I place, not someone else. So why would I bash someone else for idiotic bets I make? Moreover, I see no benefactor in doing so. How would bashing you or anyone else help me win more bets?
Be that as it may, you make a very lucid argument for Georgia this week. One thing you point out that I didn't realize, is that Vandy has eclipsed the 100-yard passing mark only once all season. With that in mind, it's rather remarkable what the 'Dores have accomplished so far this year. And even though he has a girl's name, I think they'd be more effective throwing the ball if they just stick with McKenzie Adams. He is clearly the better passer, and the team just seems to be more confident when he's behind center.
Nevertheless, your persuasive argument for the Bulldogs notwithstanding, I still don't see any value in laying a +2 TD spread with Georgia. You're probably right as you were with Florida last week, but I just don't think I could pull the trigger on Georgia here.
buddy!!!
FREAK OUT!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.