SNF: Best of luck to you on your Illinois play. I know you posted in my thread already, but knowing the Illinois program like I do - I just can't see them winning this game with all the holes they have defensively. I really believe they aren't there yet and Scheelhause can't win the game by himself. I really think Arizona St wins by double digits 34-24. I do respect your plays and read your posts every week, but I have to go against this you this time. And - I did take into account the look ahead factor of USC. I just don't think Illinois is ready to take this next step.
0
SNF: Best of luck to you on your Illinois play. I know you posted in my thread already, but knowing the Illinois program like I do - I just can't see them winning this game with all the holes they have defensively. I really believe they aren't there yet and Scheelhause can't win the game by himself. I really think Arizona St wins by double digits 34-24. I do respect your plays and read your posts every week, but I have to go against this you this time. And - I did take into account the look ahead factor of USC. I just don't think Illinois is ready to take this next step.
SNF: Best of luck to you on your Illinois play. I know you posted in my thread already, but knowing the Illinois program like I do - I just can't see them winning this game with all the holes they have defensively. I really believe they aren't there yet and Scheelhause can't win the game by himself. I really think Arizona St wins by double digits 34-24. I do respect your plays and read your posts every week, but I have to go against this you this time. And - I did take into account the look ahead factor of USC. I just don't think Illinois is ready to take this next step.
No worries, we can def. disagree on opinions of how a game comes out..
I also do think ASU is the better team, but I play spots and this is one of the best ones so far this year..
I've been wrong before, so it's possible ASU wins, but it should be a good game
0
Quote Originally Posted by tts_22:
SNF: Best of luck to you on your Illinois play. I know you posted in my thread already, but knowing the Illinois program like I do - I just can't see them winning this game with all the holes they have defensively. I really believe they aren't there yet and Scheelhause can't win the game by himself. I really think Arizona St wins by double digits 34-24. I do respect your plays and read your posts every week, but I have to go against this you this time. And - I did take into account the look ahead factor of USC. I just don't think Illinois is ready to take this next step.
No worries, we can def. disagree on opinions of how a game comes out..
I also do think ASU is the better team, but I play spots and this is one of the best ones so far this year..
I've been wrong before, so it's possible ASU wins, but it should be a good game
LSU was a guarantee win from a mile away and yet there was pple saying that MSt had a chance? also on the under.. how it was gonna be over 49 with that defense on both teams? bearly made it to 30pts..
0
LSU was a guarantee win from a mile away and yet there was pple saying that MSt had a chance? also on the under.. how it was gonna be over 49 with that defense on both teams? bearly made it to 30pts..
I was too tired to do a write-up. I'm not the person who tries to justify his picks by saying " X TEAM IS TOO GOod, WE WILL WIN" and other dumb remarks. Vanderbilt is not a good football team, but what many people fail to realize, or fail to do research on; is that they return all starters in skilled position. All eleven starters on offense, the secondary returns almost completely intact and is full of bona fide
SEC-caliber talent. Casey Hayward was voted second team All-SEC at
cornerback in 2010 after posting six interceptions. Eddie Foster started
most of the season at the other cornerback position and returns along
with both starting safeties Sean Richardson and Kenny Ladler. D-line is a worry though, with only 1 starter returning. Ole miss has a three-man quarterback contest between Brunetti, Zack Stoudt, and Randall Mackey. They are also inexperienced in the D line and secondary. Ole miss is not going to scorch Vandy's secondary. And they will need to pick up their rushing offense for this game to remain close. Needless to say they are without bolden and davis as running backs; due to injuries. Vandy hammered Ole miss last year as a 11 point dog, and I don't see how anything will change.
0
I was too tired to do a write-up. I'm not the person who tries to justify his picks by saying " X TEAM IS TOO GOod, WE WILL WIN" and other dumb remarks. Vanderbilt is not a good football team, but what many people fail to realize, or fail to do research on; is that they return all starters in skilled position. All eleven starters on offense, the secondary returns almost completely intact and is full of bona fide
SEC-caliber talent. Casey Hayward was voted second team All-SEC at
cornerback in 2010 after posting six interceptions. Eddie Foster started
most of the season at the other cornerback position and returns along
with both starting safeties Sean Richardson and Kenny Ladler. D-line is a worry though, with only 1 starter returning. Ole miss has a three-man quarterback contest between Brunetti, Zack Stoudt, and Randall Mackey. They are also inexperienced in the D line and secondary. Ole miss is not going to scorch Vandy's secondary. And they will need to pick up their rushing offense for this game to remain close. Needless to say they are without bolden and davis as running backs; due to injuries. Vandy hammered Ole miss last year as a 11 point dog, and I don't see how anything will change.
Week 3 Card Miss State +4 vs. LSU, $220 to win $200 Illinois +1 vs. Arizona State, $220 to win $200 Ole Miss -1 at Vanderbilt, $220 to win $200 Texas Tech -20 at New Mexico, $220 to win $200 Parlay: Clemson -1 (-170),Mich State +7 (-165), UCF -1 (-180) Iowa -3 vs. Pitt, $220 to win $200 Clemson -3 vs. Auburn, $110 to win $100 Louisville +7 at Kentucky, $220 to win $200 Michigan State +5 at Notre Dame, $110 to win $100 TCU -28.5 vs. UL Monroe, $220 to win $200
0
Nice start..
Week 3 Card Miss State +4 vs. LSU, $220 to win $200 Illinois +1 vs. Arizona State, $220 to win $200 Ole Miss -1 at Vanderbilt, $220 to win $200 Texas Tech -20 at New Mexico, $220 to win $200 Parlay: Clemson -1 (-170),Mich State +7 (-165), UCF -1 (-180) Iowa -3 vs. Pitt, $220 to win $200 Clemson -3 vs. Auburn, $110 to win $100 Louisville +7 at Kentucky, $220 to win $200 Michigan State +5 at Notre Dame, $110 to win $100 TCU -28.5 vs. UL Monroe, $220 to win $200
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.