Cincinnati vs. San DiegoState (-3, 56.5) (8 pm ET, ESPN)
My power ratings make this Hawaii Bowl game a Pick'em, but the matchup greatly favors San Diego State. Cincinnati actually opened as a -2 point favorite and moved to a +3 point underdog as QB Gunner Kiel will miss this game due to personal reasons.
This is not a good matchup for the Bearcats. Cincinnati and San Diego State are complete opposites. The Bearcats have a potent offense and a terrible defense. Cincinnati likes to throw the ball a lot; they average 373 passing yards per game. The Bearcats’ defense gave up 37 points per game on 6.2 yards per play against the eight bowl teams they faced this season. Backup quarterback Hayden Moore has plenty of experience, but he had weaker numbers overall this season compared to QB Gunner Kiel.
San Diego State will also be without their starting quarterback as Maxwell Smith will miss this game due to a knee injury. However, San Diego State runs the ball essentially on every play; they averaged 48 rushing attempts per game while running for 235 yards, compared to just 18 passing attempts per game. Overall, the Aztecs averaged 31.4 points per game on 5.7 yards per play. San Diego State has the superior defense as they allowed just 17.2 points per game on 4.7 yards per play this season (versus opponents that averaged 24.8 ppg and 5.4 yppl).
The Aztecs run the ball on 73% of their total offensive plays and they should have plenty of success on the ground against a terrible Cincinnati rush defense that allowed 191 rushing yards per game on 5.0 yards per carry this season (versus opponents that averaged just 151 yards and 4.0 ypr overall).
----------------
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Cincinnati vs. San DiegoState (-3, 56.5) (8 pm ET, ESPN)
My power ratings make this Hawaii Bowl game a Pick'em, but the matchup greatly favors San Diego State. Cincinnati actually opened as a -2 point favorite and moved to a +3 point underdog as QB Gunner Kiel will miss this game due to personal reasons.
This is not a good matchup for the Bearcats. Cincinnati and San Diego State are complete opposites. The Bearcats have a potent offense and a terrible defense. Cincinnati likes to throw the ball a lot; they average 373 passing yards per game. The Bearcats’ defense gave up 37 points per game on 6.2 yards per play against the eight bowl teams they faced this season. Backup quarterback Hayden Moore has plenty of experience, but he had weaker numbers overall this season compared to QB Gunner Kiel.
San Diego State will also be without their starting quarterback as Maxwell Smith will miss this game due to a knee injury. However, San Diego State runs the ball essentially on every play; they averaged 48 rushing attempts per game while running for 235 yards, compared to just 18 passing attempts per game. Overall, the Aztecs averaged 31.4 points per game on 5.7 yards per play. San Diego State has the superior defense as they allowed just 17.2 points per game on 4.7 yards per play this season (versus opponents that averaged 24.8 ppg and 5.4 yppl).
The Aztecs run the ball on 73% of their total offensive plays and they should have plenty of success on the ground against a terrible Cincinnati rush defense that allowed 191 rushing yards per game on 5.0 yards per carry this season (versus opponents that averaged just 151 yards and 4.0 ypr overall).
Cincinnati vs. San DiegoState (-3, 56.5) (8 pm ET, ESPN)
My power ratings make this Hawaii Bowl game a Pick'em, but the matchup greatly favors San Diego State. Cincinnati actually opened as a -2 point favorite and moved to a +3 point underdog as QB Gunner Kiel will miss this game due to personal reasons.
This is not a good matchup for the Bearcats. Cincinnati and San Diego State are complete opposites. The Bearcats have a potent offense and a terrible defense. Cincinnati likes to throw the ball a lot; they average 373 passing yards per game. The Bearcats’ defense gave up 37 points per game on 6.2 yards per play against the eight bowl teams they faced this season. Backup quarterback Hayden Moore has plenty of experience, but he had weaker numbers overall this season compared to QB Gunner Kiel.
San Diego State will also be without their starting quarterback as Maxwell Smith will miss this game due to a knee injury. However, San Diego State runs the ball essentially on every play; they averaged 48 rushing attempts per game while running for 235 yards, compared to just 18 passing attempts per game. Overall, the Aztecs averaged 31.4 points per game on 5.7 yards per play. San Diego State has the superior defense as they allowed just 17.2 points per game on 4.7 yards per play this season (versus opponents that averaged 24.8 ppg and 5.4 yppl).
The Aztecs run the ball on 73% of their total offensive plays and they should have plenty of success on the ground against a terrible Cincinnati rush defense that allowed 191 rushing yards per game on 5.0 yards per carry this season (versus opponents that averaged just 151 yards and 4.0 ypr overall).
----------------
Outstanding info MCR, I couldn't have said it better myself, Thanks Amigo!
0
Quote Originally Posted by magiccarpetride:
Cincinnati vs. San DiegoState (-3, 56.5) (8 pm ET, ESPN)
My power ratings make this Hawaii Bowl game a Pick'em, but the matchup greatly favors San Diego State. Cincinnati actually opened as a -2 point favorite and moved to a +3 point underdog as QB Gunner Kiel will miss this game due to personal reasons.
This is not a good matchup for the Bearcats. Cincinnati and San Diego State are complete opposites. The Bearcats have a potent offense and a terrible defense. Cincinnati likes to throw the ball a lot; they average 373 passing yards per game. The Bearcats’ defense gave up 37 points per game on 6.2 yards per play against the eight bowl teams they faced this season. Backup quarterback Hayden Moore has plenty of experience, but he had weaker numbers overall this season compared to QB Gunner Kiel.
San Diego State will also be without their starting quarterback as Maxwell Smith will miss this game due to a knee injury. However, San Diego State runs the ball essentially on every play; they averaged 48 rushing attempts per game while running for 235 yards, compared to just 18 passing attempts per game. Overall, the Aztecs averaged 31.4 points per game on 5.7 yards per play. San Diego State has the superior defense as they allowed just 17.2 points per game on 4.7 yards per play this season (versus opponents that averaged 24.8 ppg and 5.4 yppl).
The Aztecs run the ball on 73% of their total offensive plays and they should have plenty of success on the ground against a terrible Cincinnati rush defense that allowed 191 rushing yards per game on 5.0 yards per carry this season (versus opponents that averaged just 151 yards and 4.0 ypr overall).
----------------
Outstanding info MCR, I couldn't have said it better myself, Thanks Amigo!
Thanks Magic, I've been on SDSU from day one and now down to -1.5. Time to play. They'll have the stops when Cincy can't. The TO difference is huge for SDSU. QB changes not as severe for SDSU
GL, Doc
0
Thanks Magic, I've been on SDSU from day one and now down to -1.5. Time to play. They'll have the stops when Cincy can't. The TO difference is huge for SDSU. QB changes not as severe for SDSU
Thanks for the info good sir. I have been following on this site for sometime, but just started to comment. I also don't understand why many are on the over in this game. SDSU should try to control the clock on the ground and with quarterback issues, I cant see this going over. Again, thanks for the input
0
Thanks for the info good sir. I have been following on this site for sometime, but just started to comment. I also don't understand why many are on the over in this game. SDSU should try to control the clock on the ground and with quarterback issues, I cant see this going over. Again, thanks for the input
Thanks for the info good sir. I have been following on this site for sometime, but just started to comment. I also don't understand why many are on the over in this game. SDSU should try to control the clock on the ground and with quarterback issues, I cant see this going over. Again, thanks for the input
bet the opposite of the obvious. No QB issues = under right?
good defense of the aztec right?
Take cinn and the over. Totally opposite to what the stats shows. Everybody and their grandma bets on stats. We here will fade the cover's people for money.
X_____________________________
0
Quote Originally Posted by HeartsHandys:
Thanks for the info good sir. I have been following on this site for sometime, but just started to comment. I also don't understand why many are on the over in this game. SDSU should try to control the clock on the ground and with quarterback issues, I cant see this going over. Again, thanks for the input
bet the opposite of the obvious. No QB issues = under right?
good defense of the aztec right?
Take cinn and the over. Totally opposite to what the stats shows. Everybody and their grandma bets on stats. We here will fade the cover's people for money.
bet the opposite of the obvious. No QB issues = under right?
good defense of the aztec right?
Take cinn and the over. Totally opposite to what the stats shows. Everybody and their grandma bets on stats. We here will fade the cover's people for money.
Actually that is not bad logic, and I use it often. The problem here is that I have seen Cincinnati play and I was very much not impressed. Their defense is really not good. I cannot see them holding back a rushing attack like Navy.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:
bet the opposite of the obvious. No QB issues = under right?
good defense of the aztec right?
Take cinn and the over. Totally opposite to what the stats shows. Everybody and their grandma bets on stats. We here will fade the cover's people for money.
Actually that is not bad logic, and I use it often. The problem here is that I have seen Cincinnati play and I was very much not impressed. Their defense is really not good. I cannot see them holding back a rushing attack like Navy.
Actually that is not bad logic, and I use it often. The problem here is that I have seen Cincinnati play and I was very much not impressed. Their defense is really not good. I cannot see them holding back a rushing attack like Navy.
GL
Easy
Stack the box, make the guy throw.
And he can't throw.
Cin is the play
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
Actually that is not bad logic, and I use it often. The problem here is that I have seen Cincinnati play and I was very much not impressed. Their defense is really not good. I cannot see them holding back a rushing attack like Navy.
On a side note weather here in Honolulu is great. Slight overcast in some spots but mostly sunny. Feels like mid 70s. Very light breeze. Good luck to all
It's all probabilities
0
On a side note weather here in Honolulu is great. Slight overcast in some spots but mostly sunny. Feels like mid 70s. Very light breeze. Good luck to all
without their QB........ Just depending only on the run game is fishy for me. Cinci can be bad at defending the Run but it is a bowl game and they're confidence are running high so don't expect it to be easy. I'm rolling with Cincinatti.
0
without their QB........ Just depending only on the run game is fishy for me. Cinci can be bad at defending the Run but it is a bowl game and they're confidence are running high so don't expect it to be easy. I'm rolling with Cincinatti.
bet the opposite of the obvious. No QB issues = under right?
good defense of the aztec right?
Take cinn and the over. Totally opposite to what the stats shows. Everybody and their grandma bets on stats. We here will fade the cover's people for money.
You really think it's as easy as bet against the obvious? Cincy might be the play but if it were as simple as you say, Vegas would be broke
0
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:
bet the opposite of the obvious. No QB issues = under right?
good defense of the aztec right?
Take cinn and the over. Totally opposite to what the stats shows. Everybody and their grandma bets on stats. We here will fade the cover's people for money.
You really think it's as easy as bet against the obvious? Cincy might be the play but if it were as simple as you say, Vegas would be broke
I've watched Cincy several times this year and I didn't like what I saw.
They got manhandled by Temple at home.
They got absolutely obliterated by USF giving up an unfathomable 51 in the first half. I'm not kidding when I say it looked like there was only one team on the field in that first half at times as USF did anything it wanted and many times there wasn't a player within 10 yards of an offensive player on a way to a score.
And then they just barely squeaked by an underachieving, anemic East Carolina team to get to this bowl.
Not impressed at all Cincy and there is no way I'm betting Cincy here. No way...
0
Good write-up.
I've watched Cincy several times this year and I didn't like what I saw.
They got manhandled by Temple at home.
They got absolutely obliterated by USF giving up an unfathomable 51 in the first half. I'm not kidding when I say it looked like there was only one team on the field in that first half at times as USF did anything it wanted and many times there wasn't a player within 10 yards of an offensive player on a way to a score.
And then they just barely squeaked by an underachieving, anemic East Carolina team to get to this bowl.
Not impressed at all Cincy and there is no way I'm betting Cincy here. No way...
Does anyone remember when Hayden Moore came off the bench against Memphis and broke a school record throwing for 557 yards and 4 td's? They lost the game but this kid can play. Their defense does suck though and Tuberville has the biggest ears I have ever seen. That's got to count for something right..
0
Does anyone remember when Hayden Moore came off the bench against Memphis and broke a school record throwing for 557 yards and 4 td's? They lost the game but this kid can play. Their defense does suck though and Tuberville has the biggest ears I have ever seen. That's got to count for something right..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.