Did you watch the game? Good Lord man... the answer is basically constructive YES and HELL YES to your questions above. Opening drive WISC drives right down on this vaunted TCU defense and Toon drops a pass right in his hands at the 1. Should have been an easy TD but they live with getting 3, so in this game it might as well been a turnover in the red zone because not getting 7 is big and that was on WISC NOT TCU. TCU did nothing to prevent that play from happening, just bonehead Toon dropping it.
Later in the 1H the WISC kicker missed a chip shot FG. One that and I quote Musty says has never missed from this distance this year. Again what did TCU do to prevent this? WISC again beating themselves.
In the 2H on a critical 2nd and forever the refs call a pass interference (same 15 yard penalty as a personal foul) that wasn't a pass interference for one and two was clearly uncatchable. TCU scores a TD on that drive. TCU might have converted on third and forever but I would take my chances.
WISC dropped three INTS, whereas TCU didn't even have a chance at one. WISC could have ran on WISC ALL DAY LONG if they would have gameplanned it (why they didn't I don't have the foggiest). The WISC drive before the half where they were satisfied to go for the FG instead of the TD despite having all three time outs. TCU defense was beyond gased. I have no doubt that absent a fumble if WISC ran four more times it would have been a TD from that range. They had three times outs I never got that decision either. So I stick to my original point that TCU was lucky to escape with a win. WISC beat WISC. Just the missed FG alone despite all the above WISC should have won.
That being said, I posted above that TCU deserves the #2 ranking but get the F out of here with a share in the national title.
Did you watch the game? Good Lord man... the answer is basically constructive YES and HELL YES to your questions above. Opening drive WISC drives right down on this vaunted TCU defense and Toon drops a pass right in his hands at the 1. Should have been an easy TD but they live with getting 3, so in this game it might as well been a turnover in the red zone because not getting 7 is big and that was on WISC NOT TCU. TCU did nothing to prevent that play from happening, just bonehead Toon dropping it.
Later in the 1H the WISC kicker missed a chip shot FG. One that and I quote Musty says has never missed from this distance this year. Again what did TCU do to prevent this? WISC again beating themselves.
In the 2H on a critical 2nd and forever the refs call a pass interference (same 15 yard penalty as a personal foul) that wasn't a pass interference for one and two was clearly uncatchable. TCU scores a TD on that drive. TCU might have converted on third and forever but I would take my chances.
WISC dropped three INTS, whereas TCU didn't even have a chance at one. WISC could have ran on WISC ALL DAY LONG if they would have gameplanned it (why they didn't I don't have the foggiest). The WISC drive before the half where they were satisfied to go for the FG instead of the TD despite having all three time outs. TCU defense was beyond gased. I have no doubt that absent a fumble if WISC ran four more times it would have been a TD from that range. They had three times outs I never got that decision either. So I stick to my original point that TCU was lucky to escape with a win. WISC beat WISC. Just the missed FG alone despite all the above WISC should have won.
That being said, I posted above that TCU deserves the #2 ranking but get the F out of here with a share in the national title.
In my playoffs,
Auburn plays Wisconsin
Oregon plays TCU
The two winners meet and the case is closed. Of course, many would be argueing that Stanford should have been in, but you just can't please everybody!!
In my playoffs,
Auburn plays Wisconsin
Oregon plays TCU
The two winners meet and the case is closed. Of course, many would be argueing that Stanford should have been in, but you just can't please everybody!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.