Am I right in saying this whole forum will be Oklahoma?
But of course we must remember that Texas Tech has not been the least bit testing on the road. Their 4 road opponents this year have a combine record of 20-23.
Texas Tech’s 3 Big 12 road opponents have a combine conference record of 6-16
Their biggest road win was against 6-5
But of course we must remember that Texas Tech has not been the least bit testing on the road. Their 4 road opponents this year have a combine record of 20-23.
Texas Tech’s 3 Big 12 road opponents have a combine conference record of 6-16
Their biggest road win was against 6-5
If Oklahoma went instead of Texas, then they would need to drop the BSC right on the spot.
If Oklahoma went instead of Texas, then they would need to drop the BSC right on the spot.
Texas Tech hasn’t won in Norman since 1996 but they will bring the conference’s most dangerous offense to town on November 22nd. Stacked with 18 returning starters (10 offense, 8 defense) expectations are as high as they’ve been in Lubbock since Mike Leach took over in 2000.
With 10 returning starters the Red Raiders return literally everyone from an offense that averaged 40.9 points and 529 yards per game last season. The guy in the armor could be Danny Amendola who graduated in `07 after posting 1,245 receiving yards and 6 touchdowns. His absence could allow opposing defenses to focus solely on Heisman candidate Michael Crabtree unless Eric Harris or Edward Britton step up and produce similar numbers.
2007 Offensive Leaders | ||
Passing | Graham Harrell | 512/713, 5705 yards, 48 TD, 14 INT |
Rushing | Shannon Woods | 84 carries 450 yards, 8 touchdowns |
Receiving | Michael Crabtree | 134 receptions, 1962 yards, 22 touchdowns |
Defensively the Red Raiders appear to be better than 2007, at least on paper. When it comes to Texas Tech and defense I’ll have to believe it when I see it. Mike Leach will never be confused with a defensive minded coach but if there was ever a year in which the Red Raiders would produce a top tier defense it would be 2008. Tech loses their leading tackler from last season but return their leaders in sacks, tackles for loss and interceptions.
The Red Raiders gave up 25.9 points per game last season and allowed opponents 177 yards on the ground and 188 through the air which is an increase in every category over 2006. In their four losses last year Tech gave up 49, 41, 31 and 59 points. Apparently there is a magic formula to beating the Red Raiders which involves playing them at home and having a strong rushing attack. Both of those factors can help overcome Tech’s high powered offense and both are in Oklahoma’s corner in 2008.
2007 Defensive Leaders | ||
Tackles | Joe Garcia | 92 |
Tackles for Loss | Colby Whitlock, Brandon Williams | 6.5 |
Sacks | Brandon Williams | 6 |
Interceptions | Jamar Wall | 5 |
We can analyze all we want but facts are facts and the Red Raiders beat Oklahoma by a touchdown last year in Lubbock. We all remember Sam Bradford going out early in the game and Tech hanging on in the second half for the victory. Hopefully Bradford will be healthy this year when they play because Tech will definitely be more experienced.
There has also been a pattern develop in this series since 2004 in which the Sooners lose by a touchdown or less on the road but win by double digits in Norman.
Texas Tech hasn’t won in Norman since 1996 but they will bring the conference’s most dangerous offense to town on November 22nd. Stacked with 18 returning starters (10 offense, 8 defense) expectations are as high as they’ve been in Lubbock since Mike Leach took over in 2000.
With 10 returning starters the Red Raiders return literally everyone from an offense that averaged 40.9 points and 529 yards per game last season. The guy in the armor could be Danny Amendola who graduated in `07 after posting 1,245 receiving yards and 6 touchdowns. His absence could allow opposing defenses to focus solely on Heisman candidate Michael Crabtree unless Eric Harris or Edward Britton step up and produce similar numbers.
2007 Offensive Leaders | ||
Passing | Graham Harrell | 512/713, 5705 yards, 48 TD, 14 INT |
Rushing | Shannon Woods | 84 carries 450 yards, 8 touchdowns |
Receiving | Michael Crabtree | 134 receptions, 1962 yards, 22 touchdowns |
Defensively the Red Raiders appear to be better than 2007, at least on paper. When it comes to Texas Tech and defense I’ll have to believe it when I see it. Mike Leach will never be confused with a defensive minded coach but if there was ever a year in which the Red Raiders would produce a top tier defense it would be 2008. Tech loses their leading tackler from last season but return their leaders in sacks, tackles for loss and interceptions.
The Red Raiders gave up 25.9 points per game last season and allowed opponents 177 yards on the ground and 188 through the air which is an increase in every category over 2006. In their four losses last year Tech gave up 49, 41, 31 and 59 points. Apparently there is a magic formula to beating the Red Raiders which involves playing them at home and having a strong rushing attack. Both of those factors can help overcome Tech’s high powered offense and both are in Oklahoma’s corner in 2008.
2007 Defensive Leaders | ||
Tackles | Joe Garcia | 92 |
Tackles for Loss | Colby Whitlock, Brandon Williams | 6.5 |
Sacks | Brandon Williams | 6 |
Interceptions | Jamar Wall | 5 |
We can analyze all we want but facts are facts and the Red Raiders beat Oklahoma by a touchdown last year in Lubbock. We all remember Sam Bradford going out early in the game and Tech hanging on in the second half for the victory. Hopefully Bradford will be healthy this year when they play because Tech will definitely be more experienced.
There has also been a pattern develop in this series since 2004 in which the Sooners lose by a touchdown or less on the road but win by double digits in Norman.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.