As an ESPN Insider, a service included is pick analysis by Team Rankings and NumberFire. NumberFire actually produces a Return on Investment as well as a spread probability based on stats, this year's team, and comparable teams in the past. You can access the results by paying another monthly subscription... but I'm not doing that. Instead, I'm just going to look at games that have a 60% probability of a spread being covered or greater and see how those perform. I've already created a spreadsheet and will report back to see if this model produces any sort of sustainable results.
Interesting that the majority of the high probability covers are underdogs; I'll also see if that is a trend. 29 FBS games this week are showing 60% or greater this week; 7 of those games are listed at 70% or higher. Only 11 of the 29 are favorites (38%)
I have a degree in mathematics so every now and then the nerd comes out and starts running numbers.
Happy Friday and BoL to everyone this weekend!
0
Testing a theory...
As an ESPN Insider, a service included is pick analysis by Team Rankings and NumberFire. NumberFire actually produces a Return on Investment as well as a spread probability based on stats, this year's team, and comparable teams in the past. You can access the results by paying another monthly subscription... but I'm not doing that. Instead, I'm just going to look at games that have a 60% probability of a spread being covered or greater and see how those perform. I've already created a spreadsheet and will report back to see if this model produces any sort of sustainable results.
Interesting that the majority of the high probability covers are underdogs; I'll also see if that is a trend. 29 FBS games this week are showing 60% or greater this week; 7 of those games are listed at 70% or higher. Only 11 of the 29 are favorites (38%)
I have a degree in mathematics so every now and then the nerd comes out and starts running numbers.
Rough Start but fortunately both small bets... can’t count on 800 penalties in a game.
Adding...
GaTech vs Citadel U58.5 (2.64 to win 2.4) - first wager larger than a unit. Citadel runs the option and guess what GaTech practiced against for the last few years? Citadel will struggle to score and Tech is just plain awful on offense. They might get to 30 but the Citadel wont chip in much help
0
Rough Start but fortunately both small bets... can’t count on 800 penalties in a game.
Adding...
GaTech vs Citadel U58.5 (2.64 to win 2.4) - first wager larger than a unit. Citadel runs the option and guess what GaTech practiced against for the last few years? Citadel will struggle to score and Tech is just plain awful on offense. They might get to 30 but the Citadel wont chip in much help
Testing a theory... As an ESPN Insider, a service included is pick analysis by Team Rankings and NumberFire. NumberFire actually produces a Return on Investment as well as a spread probability based on stats, this year's team, and comparable teams in the past. You can access the results by paying another monthly subscription... but I'm not doing that. Instead, I'm just going to look at games that have a 60% probability of a spread being covered or greater and see how those perform. I've already created a spreadsheet and will report back to see if this model produces any sort of sustainable results. Interesting that the majority of the high probability covers are underdogs; I'll also see if that is a trend. 29 FBS games this week are showing 60% or greater this week; 7 of those games are listed at 70% or higher. Only 11 of the 29 are favorites (38%) I have a degree in mathematics so every now and then the nerd comes out and starts running numbers. Happy Friday and BoL to everyone this weekend!
Nerd Dog,
If you haven't yet, take a tour of a Sportsbook "Alg"" Room in Vegas. They hire some crazy good math/IT guys. I couldn't understand half of what they said (I have minor in Applied Stats) but their operation must rival military command rooms.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GamblinDAWG:
Testing a theory... As an ESPN Insider, a service included is pick analysis by Team Rankings and NumberFire. NumberFire actually produces a Return on Investment as well as a spread probability based on stats, this year's team, and comparable teams in the past. You can access the results by paying another monthly subscription... but I'm not doing that. Instead, I'm just going to look at games that have a 60% probability of a spread being covered or greater and see how those perform. I've already created a spreadsheet and will report back to see if this model produces any sort of sustainable results. Interesting that the majority of the high probability covers are underdogs; I'll also see if that is a trend. 29 FBS games this week are showing 60% or greater this week; 7 of those games are listed at 70% or higher. Only 11 of the 29 are favorites (38%) I have a degree in mathematics so every now and then the nerd comes out and starts running numbers. Happy Friday and BoL to everyone this weekend!
Nerd Dog,
If you haven't yet, take a tour of a Sportsbook "Alg"" Room in Vegas. They hire some crazy good math/IT guys. I couldn't understand half of what they said (I have minor in Applied Stats) but their operation must rival military command rooms.
What's your feeling on the ND line for next week? I was thinking Georgia -11
Yeah, I think you're going to get UGA at -11 or -12. If the golden domers can pound that line down below 10 it's probably worth a look. I'm interested to see what everyone is saying on the forum next week. Too much bias in me to put any money on UGA v ND; I'll be excited enough just to watch that one.
Ugh. I'm biased too....but very worried about blowout city next week . UGA will want to make a BIG statement to the Committee. Anything south of 14 would seem like an auto bet.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GamblinDAWG:
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
What's your feeling on the ND line for next week? I was thinking Georgia -11
Yeah, I think you're going to get UGA at -11 or -12. If the golden domers can pound that line down below 10 it's probably worth a look. I'm interested to see what everyone is saying on the forum next week. Too much bias in me to put any money on UGA v ND; I'll be excited enough just to watch that one.
Ugh. I'm biased too....but very worried about blowout city next week . UGA will want to make a BIG statement to the Committee. Anything south of 14 would seem like an auto bet.
Not looking good for Arky State, you guys may still hit the over but the UGA defense showed up to PLAY. The biggest difference being a solid pass rush...
On another note, wish I would have bet my house on the GT/Cit under! Knew the books had that one way too high.
Ohio State and the Under looking good so far. Maryland in a battle with Temple.
0
Not looking good for Arky State, you guys may still hit the over but the UGA defense showed up to PLAY. The biggest difference being a solid pass rush...
On another note, wish I would have bet my house on the GT/Cit under! Knew the books had that one way too high.
Ohio State and the Under looking good so far. Maryland in a battle with Temple.
Lord have sweet mercy... nothing like regressing to the mean huh? The silver lining here is that I made GT/Cit Under a large wager which saved an otherwise dreadful weekend.
Week 3: 3-7 (30%) -1.38
YTD: 18-15 (55%) +1.70
There may be some substance to that NumberFire theory, the sun still rose this morning, and UGA primetime against the Irish this week! Week 4 wagers coming soon...
0
Florida -9
Ohio State -17.5
Maryland -6.5
Army -16
Texas Tech -3
6pt Teaser
7pt Teaser
10pt Teaser
WSU/Houston O55
GT/Cit U58.5
Lord have sweet mercy... nothing like regressing to the mean huh? The silver lining here is that I made GT/Cit Under a large wager which saved an otherwise dreadful weekend.
Week 3: 3-7 (30%) -1.38
YTD: 18-15 (55%) +1.70
There may be some substance to that NumberFire theory, the sun still rose this morning, and UGA primetime against the Irish this week! Week 4 wagers coming soon...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.