Only thing I will say is the FSU line seems like a sucker one. Former heisman catching 8+?
Agree. I think the Noles win outright.
Agree. I think the Noles win outright.
Agree. I think the Noles win outright.
And don't discount the Urban Meyer factor. I'm sure everyone on the committee wanted to see him in the mix.
And don't discount the Urban Meyer factor. I'm sure everyone on the committee wanted to see him in the mix.
Vegas uses Sagarin as a tool way to predict public money, that is all. They don't look at his numbers and set lines according to his actual numbers. For instance, Alabama is -10. Sagarin has them at -4. Obviously they are not using Sagarin's actual numbers, not even close.They are using the fact that the public will see Sagarin's -4 in the USA Today paper or online and see the real line and bet OSU thinking they are getting 6 points of value. Once again, Sagarin has never hit 53% in a season. Sagarin is a money loser. If anything, Vegas actually in a way fades Sagarin at times because it is used by the most people. Sagarin is Joe Public's betting tool. How many other rankings are published in a nationally distributed newspaper? My 15 year old nephew knows what Sagarin is. He has no idea what Colley Matrix or Billingsley are. You would actually have to make a concerted effort to find them and know where to look. My wife can pick up a USA Today or be on their site and find his ratings .There have been many articles on Sagarin and it's usefulness, I believe Vegasinsider had one recently. I will check Sagarin to see how close my # is. If it is way off from mine and leads me to believe I can get a better #, I will hold off on the bet. That is all it is useful for.
The nutcase I was talking to thinks Sagarin is some kind of god of the gambling world. He tried to say that the Cincinnati Bengals should have been -7 in Foxboro awhile back because Sagarin said so LMAO . He started a whole thread trying to insult anyone's intelligence who would dare to back NE in that game going as far to say he would delete his account if NE went 9-7. We all know how that worked out. He is still here insulting other people for their opinions claiming he is smarter than everyone in the world. Yet the guy is constantly so far off base its hilarious. Every thread this crazy posts BS like this, its either a monkey throwing feces, or a the guy swallowing loads. There is no intelligent debate, no facts at all used by him... its basically I am the smartest man in the world( even though he is a moron). I just want the crazy to stop cluttering up peoples threads with his BS. The Fact that this nut job thinks ESPN's FPI is an actual legitimate tool for gambling is a testament to his delusions. You could pull #'s out of a hat and post them with a Sagarin label and this crazy will defend them to the end, even if they went 0-1000. The guy just never learns. LOL
Vegas uses Sagarin as a tool way to predict public money, that is all. They don't look at his numbers and set lines according to his actual numbers. For instance, Alabama is -10. Sagarin has them at -4. Obviously they are not using Sagarin's actual numbers, not even close.They are using the fact that the public will see Sagarin's -4 in the USA Today paper or online and see the real line and bet OSU thinking they are getting 6 points of value. Once again, Sagarin has never hit 53% in a season. Sagarin is a money loser. If anything, Vegas actually in a way fades Sagarin at times because it is used by the most people. Sagarin is Joe Public's betting tool. How many other rankings are published in a nationally distributed newspaper? My 15 year old nephew knows what Sagarin is. He has no idea what Colley Matrix or Billingsley are. You would actually have to make a concerted effort to find them and know where to look. My wife can pick up a USA Today or be on their site and find his ratings .There have been many articles on Sagarin and it's usefulness, I believe Vegasinsider had one recently. I will check Sagarin to see how close my # is. If it is way off from mine and leads me to believe I can get a better #, I will hold off on the bet. That is all it is useful for.
The nutcase I was talking to thinks Sagarin is some kind of god of the gambling world. He tried to say that the Cincinnati Bengals should have been -7 in Foxboro awhile back because Sagarin said so LMAO . He started a whole thread trying to insult anyone's intelligence who would dare to back NE in that game going as far to say he would delete his account if NE went 9-7. We all know how that worked out. He is still here insulting other people for their opinions claiming he is smarter than everyone in the world. Yet the guy is constantly so far off base its hilarious. Every thread this crazy posts BS like this, its either a monkey throwing feces, or a the guy swallowing loads. There is no intelligent debate, no facts at all used by him... its basically I am the smartest man in the world( even though he is a moron). I just want the crazy to stop cluttering up peoples threads with his BS. The Fact that this nut job thinks ESPN's FPI is an actual legitimate tool for gambling is a testament to his delusions. You could pull #'s out of a hat and post them with a Sagarin label and this crazy will defend them to the end, even if they went 0-1000. The guy just never learns. LOL
The BCS would of had the same matchups The only difference is they had FSU and Oregon switched. The CFP committee actually had the BCS computers compile a BCS rankings. The only difference is they had the AP take the place of the Harris poll. You can view it through the Colley rankings site.
https://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html
The BCS rankings would have been:
1. Alabama
2. FSU
3. Oregon
4. OSU
5. TCU
6. Baylor
7. Miss State
8. Michigan State
9. Mississippi
10. Arizona
Exactly the same top 10 as the committee swapping Oregon and FSU and TCU and Baylor.
The BCS would of had the same matchups The only difference is they had FSU and Oregon switched. The CFP committee actually had the BCS computers compile a BCS rankings. The only difference is they had the AP take the place of the Harris poll. You can view it through the Colley rankings site.
https://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html
The BCS rankings would have been:
1. Alabama
2. FSU
3. Oregon
4. OSU
5. TCU
6. Baylor
7. Miss State
8. Michigan State
9. Mississippi
10. Arizona
Exactly the same top 10 as the committee swapping Oregon and FSU and TCU and Baylor.
The BCS would of had the same matchups The only difference is they had FSU and Oregon switched. The CFP committee actually had the BCS computers compile a BCS rankings. The only difference is they had the AP take the place of the Harris poll. You can view it through the Colley rankings site.
https://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html
The BCS rankings would have been:
1. Alabama
2. FSU
3. Oregon
4. OSU
5. TCU
6. Baylor
7. Miss State
8. Michigan State
9. Mississippi
10. Arizona
Exactly the same top 10 as the committee swapping Oregon and FSU and TCU and Baylor.
The BCS would of had the same matchups The only difference is they had FSU and Oregon switched. The CFP committee actually had the BCS computers compile a BCS rankings. The only difference is they had the AP take the place of the Harris poll. You can view it through the Colley rankings site.
https://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html
The BCS rankings would have been:
1. Alabama
2. FSU
3. Oregon
4. OSU
5. TCU
6. Baylor
7. Miss State
8. Michigan State
9. Mississippi
10. Arizona
Exactly the same top 10 as the committee swapping Oregon and FSU and TCU and Baylor.
I swear to god, you are either mentally handicapped or a pathological liar and sociopath. I am leaning towards BPD. The Golden Mean and PREDICTOR ARE SAGARIN.
I swear to god, you are either mentally handicapped or a pathological liar and sociopath. I am leaning towards BPD. The Golden Mean and PREDICTOR ARE SAGARIN.
The BCS would of had the same matchups The only difference is they had FSU and Oregon switched. The CFP committee actually had the BCS computers compile a BCS rankings. The only difference is they had the AP take the place of the Harris poll. You can view it through the Colley rankings site.
https://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html
The BCS rankings would have been:
1. Alabama
2. FSU
3. Oregon
4. OSU
5. TCU
6. Baylor
7. Miss State
8. Michigan State
9. Mississippi
10. Arizona
Exactly the same top 10 as the committee swapping Oregon and FSU and TCU and Baylor.
The BCS would of had the same matchups The only difference is they had FSU and Oregon switched. The CFP committee actually had the BCS computers compile a BCS rankings. The only difference is they had the AP take the place of the Harris poll. You can view it through the Colley rankings site.
https://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html
The BCS rankings would have been:
1. Alabama
2. FSU
3. Oregon
4. OSU
5. TCU
6. Baylor
7. Miss State
8. Michigan State
9. Mississippi
10. Arizona
Exactly the same top 10 as the committee swapping Oregon and FSU and TCU and Baylor.
Wow really? LMAO
The Golden Mean is a "formula" made by Sagarin.
Pure Points or the Predictor model is a formula created by Sagarin.
So is elo chess. It just removed MOV, so he says. They are all created by Sagarin.
The predictor or pure points formula is the one he started with long ago.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD IT SAYS IT RIGHT ON THE PAGE ABOVE HIS RANKINGS. Are you trying to say Sagarin is lying or doesn't know what his own formulas are and you do ? Holy crap you are nuts.
OMG Wow, as I typed you backtracked after you went and looked at his site and then regurgitated what little your feeble mind could.Priceless. LMAO
Power rankings are most definitely opinions. That is why they are different. They value different things. It is the author's OPINION of what factors should be included in the formula. If they weren't opinions, they would be 100% accurate and there would be only 1. They are very subjective. I can make a "power ranking" according to uniform color and use a quantitative formula. Does that mean it is valid? Absolutely not.
Wow really? LMAO
The Golden Mean is a "formula" made by Sagarin.
Pure Points or the Predictor model is a formula created by Sagarin.
So is elo chess. It just removed MOV, so he says. They are all created by Sagarin.
The predictor or pure points formula is the one he started with long ago.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD IT SAYS IT RIGHT ON THE PAGE ABOVE HIS RANKINGS. Are you trying to say Sagarin is lying or doesn't know what his own formulas are and you do ? Holy crap you are nuts.
OMG Wow, as I typed you backtracked after you went and looked at his site and then regurgitated what little your feeble mind could.Priceless. LMAO
Power rankings are most definitely opinions. That is why they are different. They value different things. It is the author's OPINION of what factors should be included in the formula. If they weren't opinions, they would be 100% accurate and there would be only 1. They are very subjective. I can make a "power ranking" according to uniform color and use a quantitative formula. Does that mean it is valid? Absolutely not.
Absolutely did not and would never tail you or anyone, especially someone who doesn't even understand Sagarin. I was just amazed that someone would create a thread specifically to insult people and boast about their ingenious Sagarin inspired line and play, call out people who intelligently question your logic and method, challenge them and their integrity, then backtrack after you lose in Fantastic and obvious fashion and still insult people that were right all along. The whole time proclaiming your superior intellect and abilities while all you did was incorrectly use Sagarin's Predictor. I didn't even post anything on that thread, I just watched the slow motion car wreck that is you in amazement. The only reason I even remembered who you are is your condescending tone. You have repeatedly appeared in other peoples threads with the same exact tone and done the same exact thing over and over again. Just Shut up already. Haven't you made yourself look dumb enough? It's like you never learn. Geezus. I know many other people have said the same exact thing. STFU already. We get it, your a psycho idiot.
Absolutely did not and would never tail you or anyone, especially someone who doesn't even understand Sagarin. I was just amazed that someone would create a thread specifically to insult people and boast about their ingenious Sagarin inspired line and play, call out people who intelligently question your logic and method, challenge them and their integrity, then backtrack after you lose in Fantastic and obvious fashion and still insult people that were right all along. The whole time proclaiming your superior intellect and abilities while all you did was incorrectly use Sagarin's Predictor. I didn't even post anything on that thread, I just watched the slow motion car wreck that is you in amazement. The only reason I even remembered who you are is your condescending tone. You have repeatedly appeared in other peoples threads with the same exact tone and done the same exact thing over and over again. Just Shut up already. Haven't you made yourself look dumb enough? It's like you never learn. Geezus. I know many other people have said the same exact thing. STFU already. We get it, your a psycho idiot.
I have made the exact same point Skipster. If the schizophrenic committee is coming up with the same (or copying) the results of the old BCS, then what is their reason for being??? Why are we throwing money at these idiots??? 5 drunk guys at the bar could do what they did, and it would have only cost a 12-pack.
I have made the exact same point Skipster. If the schizophrenic committee is coming up with the same (or copying) the results of the old BCS, then what is their reason for being??? Why are we throwing money at these idiots??? 5 drunk guys at the bar could do what they did, and it would have only cost a 12-pack.
Correct. Substitute Oklahoma and Texas for Baylor and TCU, and the Big 12 is in.
...The Freak is coming back Blazing..I'd say Bell is the best back I'm Pro Football..
Correct. Substitute Oklahoma and Texas for Baylor and TCU, and the Big 12 is in.
...The Freak is coming back Blazing..I'd say Bell is the best back I'm Pro Football..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.