[/Quote]
I dont think this is a hangover for Standford i think they get chewed out for not having a dominating win and blow out this week
[/Quote]
I dont think this is a hangover for Standford i think they get chewed out for not having a dominating win and blow out this week
Good luck this week. We see eye to eye on almost every game we're both on except for Baylor/Missou. I watched a lot of that game (sometimes it can help capping, sometimes it hurts capping but that's not the point)--Tamu literally gave that game away. Also was a big, emotional win for Missou. Walkoff ot win, lot of celebrating and hugging on the field afterward. Granted, Baylor's defense is so bad that it's even embarassing to call them a unit, but that Missou win was much more an overpriced tamu squad squandering it than a quality Missou club winning it. It's going to be tough for them to come back this week and be pumped for another Big 12 roadie, this time a night game against a team that badly needs the w. It's just a standard play for me, nothing more, but I just want to see what your reasoning is on Missou this week.
Good luck this week. We see eye to eye on almost every game we're both on except for Baylor/Missou. I watched a lot of that game (sometimes it can help capping, sometimes it hurts capping but that's not the point)--Tamu literally gave that game away. Also was a big, emotional win for Missou. Walkoff ot win, lot of celebrating and hugging on the field afterward. Granted, Baylor's defense is so bad that it's even embarassing to call them a unit, but that Missou win was much more an overpriced tamu squad squandering it than a quality Missou club winning it. It's going to be tough for them to come back this week and be pumped for another Big 12 roadie, this time a night game against a team that badly needs the w. It's just a standard play for me, nothing more, but I just want to see what your reasoning is on Missou this week.
Great stuff from you and Shark. Sometimes the best thing you can do is walk away. Colorado is unplayable. Stanford is unplayagainstable. That doesn't make CU and OSU plays, though. Maryland is similar. No value in the Hoos as road chalk, but they match up well with the Terps, who may have basically quit.
I like Pit, but think Utah goes down by 20 in the desert. I also like Kent (as much as anyone can like Kent), Missouri (who I never seem to get right), Ball, and Rice. Disagree on ISU, who should win by 28 (though I get your reasoning; I think they are well coached, and will build off of last week).
Great stuff from you and Shark. Sometimes the best thing you can do is walk away. Colorado is unplayable. Stanford is unplayagainstable. That doesn't make CU and OSU plays, though. Maryland is similar. No value in the Hoos as road chalk, but they match up well with the Terps, who may have basically quit.
I like Pit, but think Utah goes down by 20 in the desert. I also like Kent (as much as anyone can like Kent), Missouri (who I never seem to get right), Ball, and Rice. Disagree on ISU, who should win by 28 (though I get your reasoning; I think they are well coached, and will build off of last week).
As bad as we think they are, New Mexi State hasn't lost a game by more than 20 all year. Now they show up for a 12:30 start against a hungover Georgia team which doesn't have the offensive playmakers to cover this number (34).
Very rare that I like a dog catching an outrageous number but I like this one. A lot.
Excellent pickings lately my friend.
As bad as we think they are, New Mexi State hasn't lost a game by more than 20 all year. Now they show up for a 12:30 start against a hungover Georgia team which doesn't have the offensive playmakers to cover this number (34).
Very rare that I like a dog catching an outrageous number but I like this one. A lot.
Excellent pickings lately my friend.
My man, RJ... what's up.
You touched on a couple games I liked (Colorado, Maryland, IU, Oregon St.). I will probably be on all of these, albeit 1H plays as I like to take advantage of teams coming out flat.
Surprised to see you on Missouri... thought Baylor would actually be more your style.
I think a couple other possible favorites are in a good spot from a buy low/sell high perspective. Any thoughts on Cal -9.5 and Florida -13.5? Both are coming off losses, and both of their opponents (Washington St. and Vanderbilt) are coming off games where bettors saw them hang tough last week when most of their money was on Oregon and Arkansas. As a result these lines may be a shade too low?
I have noticed that you can make a killing betting against public underdogs. That's when you know a line is really messed up and Vegas is baiting people, because it takes a lot for the general public to bet an underdog. Florida, Cal, and Alabama could be good bets this week following this model.
My man, RJ... what's up.
You touched on a couple games I liked (Colorado, Maryland, IU, Oregon St.). I will probably be on all of these, albeit 1H plays as I like to take advantage of teams coming out flat.
Surprised to see you on Missouri... thought Baylor would actually be more your style.
I think a couple other possible favorites are in a good spot from a buy low/sell high perspective. Any thoughts on Cal -9.5 and Florida -13.5? Both are coming off losses, and both of their opponents (Washington St. and Vanderbilt) are coming off games where bettors saw them hang tough last week when most of their money was on Oregon and Arkansas. As a result these lines may be a shade too low?
I have noticed that you can make a killing betting against public underdogs. That's when you know a line is really messed up and Vegas is baiting people, because it takes a lot for the general public to bet an underdog. Florida, Cal, and Alabama could be good bets this week following this model.
Mr. RJSizzle you are one of the brightest man out there. Good Luck to you!!!! By the way NIU is up to +9.5 at Heritage Sportsbook
Mr. RJSizzle you are one of the brightest man out there. Good Luck to you!!!! By the way NIU is up to +9.5 at Heritage Sportsbook
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.