All Forums | College Football

Week 2 Money

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 33317
Posts: 192
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25486
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by slomotion:

Any thoughts on Tomorrows(Mon) game? That or Thursdays match up Clemson/Geo Tch?

no real opinions on those games, if you must have action on them then tease the dogs up for a small play or something, both games should be close I would think, I will look at Thursday game tommorrow, gotta get some sleep, been up all weekend with these games and getting ready for next week, the hard work is done and it is time for some rest

chat with you guys tommorrow

.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 87
Posted: #52
wow, BC is already up to -21 on thegreek
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 153
Posted: #53
Wahoos,
 
I am not sure if you saw it but I wrote in your week 1 trend last week:
 
"Good to see u back Wahoo, I have been following your picks from years. I really like Okie St. They have a team to compete this year and only the high scoring teams are going to be able to compete with them in Stillwater so I don´t think that Georgia is going to be able to keep a high scoring game. Cowboys by 10 or more.
 
I also like Nebraska -23 and Baylor +2 and FSU -6 on Monday".
 
Do u have any thoughts on those games.
 
Probably, I will get 4 - 0 if FSU beat Miami tomorrow night.
 
I lookedthe lines for week 2 and I really like Oregon -10 they should win by 20. UTEP is trash so UK will handle them easily. I'm not confident with USC, it's not good spot for them. Maybe, Ohio state didn't play to well cuz they were thinking for this game. I will wait till the kick off to get a +7 and jump in. I also like Stanford +2, Mich st -14 and Miss state +14. so far. what do you think?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8153
Posted: #54
Wahoo.......tailed you with your Ok St pick last Sat. Thanks! Having trouble pulling trigger on Oregon this week. Shouldn't they be flat in this one......all the shit that went down with Blount?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 3161
Posted: #55
GL Nice week
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 4049
Posted: #56
I watched most of the Tennessee game and if you ever watched the Raiders under Kiffin the offense is exactly the same. Lot of play action roll outs and hit the tight ends for modest gains. They had some big plays but that was against little sister of the poor. I am not sure how UCLA's D is but I don't think UT will score like they did
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 467
Posted: #57
Great write up and I must agree on all counts.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 164
Posted: #58
Bama -24 and Okie State -15 look nice. But I did aweful in week 1 so I am probably wrong on these.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1621
Posted: #59
Wahoos, screw the haters. The people who frequent the board know you are one of the few prolific winners in any sport. Coming from someone who only bets MLB,NFL, NBA (only playoffs), you and helmut are the only two people I will blindly tail. Don't get me wrong some posters inspire me to look at a game or a side and maybe after some of my own research I may side with them, but your the one person that if I'm sitting on a bunch of baseball money come saturday I look to double up on some of your picks and you rarely let me down. Don't let the detractors take away from what you do, I appreciate your posts and you enable me to win on days where I most likely wouldn't have bet a single game. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 695
Posted: #60
WahooS---What's up!!  Looking at Tulsa, Utah, Air Force, Missouri, UAB, Navy and Northwestern----But I need your thoughts.......   I'm making it hard on you!!!   Boston College at 21 or so moving too fast.  Thoughts on that one! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3154
Posted: #61
I agree with a lot of points you made except...

1) Snead did have a poor game but I don't think he's overrated.  He played great last year at
at times and other times he was erratic.  Based on pure potential and what he accomplished
last year he is one of the top nfl prospects next draft.

2) Riley did vastly improve from last year.  He didn't play flawless football but did
make some great throws albeit some pressure from Maryland.  The guy was pretty awful last
year and looked decent last game.

3) Florida is the consensus #1 and has an unreal D and Tebow but how can you gauge their new
O-line and wideouts against a team like Charleston Southern who is so far from the SEC its not funny.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 2110
Posted: #62
Nice Week 1 bud.  Looking at some of those games for week 2 as well. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5935
Posted: #63
Great info 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 453
Posted: #64
love all your picks wahoo im not betting the oregon game i dont have a feel for purdue yet and oregon is terrible
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2003
Posts: 879
Posted: #65

Just wanted to thank you for your hard work. You are tops on this site. You saved me big time last year. Looking forward to another great year

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25486
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by chulee:

wow, BC is already up to -21 on thegreek
I don't think it matters, really like BC to throttle them
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25486
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:

Wahoo.......tailed you with your Ok St pick last Sat. Thanks! Having trouble pulling trigger on Oregon this week. Shouldn't they be flat in this one......all the shit that went down with Blount?
I'm of the opinion that they will rally around the new RB and score heavily on Purdue's weak defense, I think UO rolls them, my opinion
.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 25486
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by cigarra:

Wahoos,
 
I am not sure if you saw it but I wrote in your week 1 trend last week:
 
"Good to see u back Wahoo, I have been following your picks from years. I really like Okie St. They have a team to compete this year and only the high scoring teams are going to be able to compete with them in Stillwater so I don´t think that Georgia is going to be able to keep a high scoring game. Cowboys by 10 or more.
 
I also like Nebraska -23 and Baylor +2 and FSU -6 on Monday".
 
Do u have any thoughts on those games.
 
Probably, I will get 4 - 0 if FSU beat Miami tomorrow night.
 
I lookedthe lines for week 2 and I really like Oregon -10 they should win by 20. UTEP is trash so UK will handle them easily. I'm not confident with USC, it's not good spot for them. Maybe, Ohio state didn't play to well cuz they were thinking for this game. I will wait till the kick off to get a +7 and jump in. I also like Stanford +2, Mich st -14 and Miss state +14. so far. what do you think?
I think Stanford is in a tough time slot, kind of like Cal @ Maryland last year, they are a little better than Wake this season though, I just can't back them knowing they are playing at 8 am Stanford time, that is early in the morning for college athletes, Mich St should win handily, CMich is bad and double digits dogs are usually a good bet in the SEC but that new Auburn offense has some punch, not a real opinion there for me
.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3738
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

 

i wonder if you're right about that... i told myself i would be happy with anything under a TD, so jumped early... a little worried the line could climb... it should, anyway... but OSU's following is one of blind faith, so you never know...

Really?  That blind faith was a nice cash in last year's game vs. Texas.  A game that you and several other people (at least 70 percent of the public) said would be easy.  The public perception that OSU is not good might be something to consider when capping this game and others.  I will blindly take OSU and the points like I blindly did against all reason in the bowl game last year.  Frosh QB and unproven defense in a hostile environment laying 6 points.  I'm sure I'm in the minority, but sign me up for OSU +6

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1069
Posted: #70
good write-ups.  BOL.  
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 8177
Posted: #71

Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

I think Stanford is in a tough time slot, kind of like Cal @ Maryland last year, they are a little better than Wake this season though, I just can't back them knowing they are playing at 8 am Stanford time, that is early in the morning for college athletes, Mich St should win handily, CMich is bad and double digits dogs are usually a good bet in the SEC but that new Auburn offense has some punch, not a real opinion there for me

I couldn't agree more WahooS. I think Wake gets the win here. They will be extra motivated to not lose two home games in a row. The early start time for Stanford will be very hard to overcome on the road. Wake a definite play for me. Thanks for catching that!!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21426
Posted: #72
Kevin Riley will have to improve vastly for Cal to go a long way

I thought Riley played great....17-26 (65.4%) 298 yds, 4TDs, 0 int.  Aside from the stats, I was more impressed with his decision making against the blitz happy Maryland defense.  He made a number of throws under pressure...even getting hit after some throws...and still completing.  He will improve as the season progresses, but I'd be happy with those number on a regular basis.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 7850
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:

sometimes it really pays off to get the best lines out there, all of my friends with the exception of 1 had Texas at 38 and 38.5 so they won, I usually do well getting the best lines but that is one that cost me a win, I'm sorry you lost that one bro but it is a long season and we will lose some we should win and win some we should lose, all part of it


The Early Bird gets the worm.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3041
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:

Kevin Riley will have to improve vastly for Cal to go a long way

I thought Riley played great....17-26 (65.4%) 298 yds, 4TDs, 0 int.  Aside from the stats, I was more impressed with his decision making against the blitz happy Maryland defense.  He made a number of throws under pressure...even getting hit after some throws...and still completing.  He will improve as the season progresses, but I'd be happy with those number on a regular basis.

I agree. I think he'll keep defenses from loading the box this year and Cal will be a tough team to contend with. They've got SC @ home this year, should be favored in their other games.

Agree with the other points Wahoos. Great info.

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5516
Posted: #75
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.