8-4 pending LSU +3 tonight.......
Wisconsin -34 (1.25)
Texas -21 (1.25)
looking at a few others.......
appreciate it fellas...also ladies....thought LSU would be tighter, apparently should have wagered even more....wraps up first week at 9-4 (+3.6).....fairly happy with most early numbers although probably could have waited on Cincinnati and possibly SC....checking out a couple others and totals when posted.....working on some scores and comments ...best of luck all this week
appreciate it fellas...also ladies....thought LSU would be tighter, apparently should have wagered even more....wraps up first week at 9-4 (+3.6).....fairly happy with most early numbers although probably could have waited on Cincinnati and possibly SC....checking out a couple others and totals when posted.....working on some scores and comments ...best of luck all this week
8-4 pending LSU +3 tonight.......
Wisconsin -34 (1.25)
Texas -21 (1.25)
looking at a few others.......
8-4 pending LSU +3 tonight.......
Wisconsin -34 (1.25)
Texas -21 (1.25)
looking at a few others.......
everyone.....thanks and best of luck this week....some scores and thoughts.....
Wisconsin 57 NM 10 - NM allowed 244 (7.2 pc) last week...err so against the Badgers could be....NM offense hasn’t exceeding 14 against many decent defenses...UW much better than decent yours truly, captain obvious
Texas 48 Tulsa 17 - yeah tough to project this outcome after week 1...on the other hand Tulsa D allowed 40+ in six LY and offense relies on the run (6 TD passing LY...what)... which could be tougher than most AAC
Utah St 48 NMST 14 - number inflated due to week 1....probably not enough if USU is improved...NMST offense down without QB and RB from LY so not as likely to hang around
BYU 31 Cal 21 - mostly a feeling that BYU will be improved this year...not that impressed with Cal QBs and don’t beat many good teams on the road straight up....actually didn’t really find any in last 2Y
Michigan 51 WMU 14 - another one where there's nothing much to indicate Wolves can score this many..big step down in defensive competition though...WMU offense capable of points, probably not so much with UM defense and feel team will be ready to rebound
Hawaii 52 Rice 24 - couldn't really see laying this many with UH in the past few years....however QB and WRs looking sharp and Owls rank low in PYPA 10.4......similar last year as I recall.....so becomes Rice likely needs 30-35+
FAU 31 Air Force 30 - AF not blown out much...especially against similar level teams....some skill positions returning and looked solid week 1 although FCS....FAU power rating still probably inflated from last year since not seeing them at TD better than Falcons
Arkansas 45 Colo St 24 - number obviously inflated after CSU first couple....is it enough though compared to how this could go...CSU defense not likely to hold off ARK rushing or passing (other than that...)....and not seeing Rams put up enough to keep up
Georgia 24 S Carolina 23 - like Bentley and some other skill players for SC...known over the years to play well against top teams at home....at times
Cincinnati 24 Miami OH 17 - tough to put a ton of cash on Bearcats still pretty limited on offense....UC has won last 5 in series...defense looked improved and offense should be able to run some
checking out a couple other sides and totals
everyone.....thanks and best of luck this week....some scores and thoughts.....
Wisconsin 57 NM 10 - NM allowed 244 (7.2 pc) last week...err so against the Badgers could be....NM offense hasn’t exceeding 14 against many decent defenses...UW much better than decent yours truly, captain obvious
Texas 48 Tulsa 17 - yeah tough to project this outcome after week 1...on the other hand Tulsa D allowed 40+ in six LY and offense relies on the run (6 TD passing LY...what)... which could be tougher than most AAC
Utah St 48 NMST 14 - number inflated due to week 1....probably not enough if USU is improved...NMST offense down without QB and RB from LY so not as likely to hang around
BYU 31 Cal 21 - mostly a feeling that BYU will be improved this year...not that impressed with Cal QBs and don’t beat many good teams on the road straight up....actually didn’t really find any in last 2Y
Michigan 51 WMU 14 - another one where there's nothing much to indicate Wolves can score this many..big step down in defensive competition though...WMU offense capable of points, probably not so much with UM defense and feel team will be ready to rebound
Hawaii 52 Rice 24 - couldn't really see laying this many with UH in the past few years....however QB and WRs looking sharp and Owls rank low in PYPA 10.4......similar last year as I recall.....so becomes Rice likely needs 30-35+
FAU 31 Air Force 30 - AF not blown out much...especially against similar level teams....some skill positions returning and looked solid week 1 although FCS....FAU power rating still probably inflated from last year since not seeing them at TD better than Falcons
Arkansas 45 Colo St 24 - number obviously inflated after CSU first couple....is it enough though compared to how this could go...CSU defense not likely to hold off ARK rushing or passing (other than that...)....and not seeing Rams put up enough to keep up
Georgia 24 S Carolina 23 - like Bentley and some other skill players for SC...known over the years to play well against top teams at home....at times
Cincinnati 24 Miami OH 17 - tough to put a ton of cash on Bearcats still pretty limited on offense....UC has won last 5 in series...defense looked improved and offense should be able to run some
checking out a couple other sides and totals
GW - appreciate it buddy, same here best of luck week 2
MM - what's going on, thanks yeah I think Wisky week 1 fairly low offensive points kept the number reasonable, BOL bud
adding....
Baylor -15 (0.75)
Navy +7 (-120) (0.5)
Utah-No Illinois under 47.5 (0.5)
Baylor 41 UTSA 17 - feeling Bears will be improved this year particularly on offense...not so sure about defense....although looks like UTSA offense down a few notches.....payback for last year's upset can only add some incentive to possibly extend the margin
Navy 43 Memphis 42 - bought the half point (try to limit to a few times a season) seems like an overreaction to week 1 with Middies passing defense being terrible and away from spread by 30+.....on the other hand no one (including Memphis the last 3+ years) really stops Navy so seeing a high scoring game down to last possession....Navy 3-1 home dog lately and can play with most teams
Utah 24 No Illinois 13 - Huskies offense seems lacking playmakers to both Utes defense much, NIU defense normally pretty solid although not so much week 1...figure Utah gets out to lead and content to grind out road win
should wrap things up for the week other than checking out a possible FBS-FCS or degenerate teaser Sat am
GW - appreciate it buddy, same here best of luck week 2
MM - what's going on, thanks yeah I think Wisky week 1 fairly low offensive points kept the number reasonable, BOL bud
adding....
Baylor -15 (0.75)
Navy +7 (-120) (0.5)
Utah-No Illinois under 47.5 (0.5)
Baylor 41 UTSA 17 - feeling Bears will be improved this year particularly on offense...not so sure about defense....although looks like UTSA offense down a few notches.....payback for last year's upset can only add some incentive to possibly extend the margin
Navy 43 Memphis 42 - bought the half point (try to limit to a few times a season) seems like an overreaction to week 1 with Middies passing defense being terrible and away from spread by 30+.....on the other hand no one (including Memphis the last 3+ years) really stops Navy so seeing a high scoring game down to last possession....Navy 3-1 home dog lately and can play with most teams
Utah 24 No Illinois 13 - Huskies offense seems lacking playmakers to both Utes defense much, NIU defense normally pretty solid although not so much week 1...figure Utah gets out to lead and content to grind out road win
should wrap things up for the week other than checking out a possible FBS-FCS or degenerate teaser Sat am
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.