All Forums | College Football

*** Week 4 NCAA Football ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 42776
Posts: 193
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 22698
Posted: #126
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1164
Posted: #127
This is a gambling site......A&M got the $$$$$........does anything else matter?  
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #128
Quote Originally Posted by soonboomer:

This is a gambling site......A&M got the $$$$$........does anything else matter?  


it's like talking to a stop sign
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 352
Posted: #129
Quote Originally Posted by KINGMAD13:



lmao boomer u are so biased u def. smoke in the shower.....u still harping on the fact that bama did not cover?really?....bama won the game and remain undefeated correct?......ONCE AGAIN I WILL THROW THIS AT U AND ONCE AGAIN U WILL IGNORE ME CAUSE IM 100% CORRECT!!....IF YOUR CLEMSON TIGERS WIN THIS YEARS NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP AND THEY GIVE UP 800+ YARDS AGAINST THEM ARE U REALLY GOING TO BE UPSET?..NOO U WILL BE DOING CARTWHEELS ACROSS YOUR PARENTS LIVING ROOM CAUSE THEY WON!!...IF THEY WERE FAVORED AND DID NOT COVER THE GAME BUT STILL WON THE NC WOULD U STILL BE HARPING ON IT?...NOO U WOULD BE REMINDING US UNTIL SEPT 2014 THAT CLEMSON WON THE NC....so stop harping on bama giving up so many yards and not covering,who cares a week later lol....all that matters is bama is still undefeated and johnny sunshine and a&m got an L!!

Why are you using Clemson winning the NC and giving up 800 yards as an example? Bama didn't play the NC against A&M. It was a regular season game. Yes, a win is a win, but it is early in the season and if my team gave up that many yards with 10 more games to play, it would cause me to be concerned. You can give up 1000 yards in the NC game, but if you win, it doesn't matter because it is the final game of the season, not the 3rd week. And Boom using the Florida and Miami game is a perfect example of how people are selective in saying one thing one week, then totally opposite the next. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #130
Quote Originally Posted by burningsun72:


Why are you using Clemson winning the NC and giving up 800 yards as an example? Bama didn't play the NC against A&M. It was a regular season game. Yes, a win is a win, but it is early in the season and if my team gave up that many yards with 10 more games to play, it would cause me to be concerned. You can give up 1000 yards in the NC game, but if you win, it doesn't matter because it is the final game of the season, not the 3rd week. And Boom using the Florida and Miami game is a perfect example of how people are selective in saying one thing one week, then totally opposite the next. 


Hey man  How ya been?


Remember....

You can lead a horse to water..........But you Cannot make him drink



 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 18138
Posted: #131
Quote Originally Posted by soonboomer:

This is a gambling site......A&M got the $$$$$........does anything else matter?  


Even better. Maybe people that play dogs account for the fact that there may be a backdoor cover? Lucky underdog.  But if a fav covers late that is what was supposed to happen. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 16131
Posted: #132
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:



hey dumbassss..... You dont want me speaking to you right?

Stay out of my threads you clueless idiot

I can't hear you with my person down that thoat
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 6378
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by KINGMAD13:


i have my own thread you complete bozo...obviously u are too ignorant to see that.....he presents a diff point of view?....yupp u are clueless....he presents a BIASED ANTI SEC point of view,not diff!!....anyway this is boomers thread so he can say whateva he feels like saying and 90% of the toads in here actually listen,lmao....im done here as this thread is biased and completely non helpful and useless!!


why would i have noticed that you have a thread, you nonentity?  Again, you reading impaired twat, go blow a goat.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 44
Posted: #134
Quote Originally Posted by burningsun72:


Why are you using Clemson winning the NC and giving up 800 yards as an example? Bama didn't play the NC against A&M. It was a regular season game. Yes, a win is a win, but it is early in the season and if my team gave up that many yards with 10 more games to play, it would cause me to be concerned. You can give up 1000 yards in the NC game, but if you win, it doesn't matter because it is the final game of the season, not the 3rd week. And Boom using the Florida and Miami game is a perfect example of how people are selective in saying one thing one week, then totally opposite the next. 

wow u guys are totally missing the point....ok lets make it easier for u....say clemson gives up 800+ yards a game the rest of the year and wins every single one of those games and the nc game if it gets there....do u honestly believe boomer will be on here crying about how many yards they gave up?....come on guys pay attention to detail here will ya...its all about winning!!no matter what!!......its funny how clueless u boomer followers are
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 44
Posted: #135
Quote Originally Posted by Skipster:



why would i have noticed that you have a thread, you nonentity?  Again, you reading impaired twat, go blow a goat.


the fact that u breathe on your own is a shock to me....but not shocking your are plain clueless.....lmao man u clueless toads are a dime a dozen on covers.......too easy
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 13914
Posted: #136

Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:



Tree...  ye have little faith... These totals will get better

 

I agree with Tree about the totals. I always check your totals with mine. You've done very well here.

Also, I agree with Tree about TCU. You can throw SMU (or any team coached by June Jones) into the shady category, as well as the officials from the last ASU game.

Keep doing your thang man!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1043
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

YTD :


10. Week 3 is in the books men and trolls. I need to point something out real quick. What is the deal with all the trolls on this site? Why doesn't the mods do anything about it? I got trolls asking/harassing me last year about why do I post Units. So I said, well.... I will just post plays from here on out to stop any confusion or any problems in general. But it never stops. I got clowns and trolls in my thread again asking why I dont post how much I playing on each game. Does it matter? Does it really matter? I post a play. Use it or fade it, it's that simple. I dont post on this site how much my bankroll is. Why? All the clowns would do is find something else to bitccchh about. To be honest, the trolls are embarrassing themselves. It really is funny.



IMHO many of the "trolls" are in fact coolers.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 44
Posted: #138
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:



Hey man  How ya been?


Remember....

You can lead a horse to water..........But you Cannot make him drink




boomer,u couldn't even lead a horse to water ....and the other 90% on here could not as well...thats the diff......amazing the common sense level of the toads on here....actually no its not amazing its the norm in his threads......im done in this thread cause its obvious i'm in a battle of wits with unarmed people
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 352
Posted: #139
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:



Hey man  How ya been?


Remember....

You can lead a horse to water..........But you Cannot make him drink





Been good my friend. Hope to make it up to the FSU game this year. I have the unfortunate task of "having" to go to Argentina for 2 weeks. Ya know... business trip. And my business is allowing bronzed ladies to do things to me i have dreamed of for many many years.

Keep doing what you do man. People on this site feel that you have these followers or huggers. Fact is you provide insight that has made me money. They don't like your response to them, yet they continue to post and girl and complain and post and so on..

If the cooter isn't to your tasting, you stop eating. My point, many of these stalkers must love some stank stuff for keep coming back again and again. F them and their heroes
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5834
Posted: #140
One problem is the constantly gloating and "i told you so" b.s. when he is right. 90% of those that bet on Alabama got them at -7 and also bet Alabama team total over, and Alabama -4 for the first half. Both of which covered. Of course we won't hear anything about that. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 352
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by KINGMAD13:


wow u guys are totally missing the point....ok lets make it easier for u....say clemson gives up 800+ yards a game the rest of the year and wins every single one of those games and the nc game if it gets there....do u honestly believe boomer will be on here crying about how many yards they gave up?....come on guys pay attention to detail here will ya...its all about winning!!no matter what!!......its funny how clueless u boomer followers are


Listen, i know it is about winning. Yes, it shouldn't matter what amount of yards you give up as long as you win. But eventually, you will not win giving up those kind of yards. Everyone is biased on their favorite team. Big F'n deal. Bama fans have true reason for concern if they allow anyone to run up that many yards on their "great" D.

I'll be the first one to step up and say it concerns me that Clemson's D isn't at its best in certain games and that their offense will eventually have a sub par game. Basically, no team is above losing. Not Bama, not Oregon. Still a long season to go.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 293
Posted: #142
Regarding #3.

I will tell you what Michigan was doing; being stubborn.  Al Borges in content on finding a running game.  He insists on playing smashmouth football.  He (& Brady) want to "establish" a run game.  They took this game as a moment to try and do that.  Go back and watch the ND game, not many times did Michigan just line up and try & pound the rock into an 8 man box.  Instead, they had Gardner in the gun where he can be most effective.  
Now go back and watch the Akron game.  Time and time again they tried to run at an 8 man box.  And why not?  It's Arkon.  They tried to prove a point that they were going to "establish" the run. And time and time again they got the crap knocked out of them at the LOS.  This put Gardner in a TON of 2 & 11 & 3 & 12.  

If you go back and look at the play by play of this game you see A TON of Toussaint rush middle -1.  Toussaint rush middle -2 yards.  Toussaint rush middle 1 yard.  In almost every single one of Michigan drives they had at least 1 2nd & 11 or 3rd & 10 (or more!)  I don't care who you are playing, if you consistently put your quarterback in those situations all game long, its going to be tough.  The funny thing is; when Michigan REALLY needed to get going, they put Gardner in the gun and let his athletic ability take over running the read option (going back to DRob days).  They scored in about 3 to 4 plays both drives.

Until Borges can figure out that he has a poor mans Vince Young under center (and not Matt Ryan) they are going to look like this every single week.  In my opinion, Michigan deserved to lose that game, not only because the players took Akron lightly, but because the staff is stubborn and was trying to prove a point.  Borges doesn't have the Oline to just line up and play the way he wants to.    

Borges better start using his QB correctly (more of how he did in the ND game) or Michigan is going to lose a couple games they probably shouldn't.  Gardner can be dangerous running that read option play but Borges refuses to run that style offense.  He wants a smashmouth offense predicated on a one horse back carrying the load, and then throwing play action off of it. 

I like your picks Boom, especially Duke.  Their new QB was 3-14 on 3rd down conversions last week vs GTech.  I think the Savage kid is knocking of his rust & with Pitts defense, they should get that game.  

I also like Ark St -4 (although many people seem to be on them, which is kinda scary) but I started researching this game when the line came out (orginally at -6.5).  I couldn't believe it was dropping because I like Ark a lot.  After a closer look, one glaring stat stands out;  Ark State ranks 17th in the country in 3rd down conversions. Memphis defense ranked 115th on 3rd Down (and Ark has had the tougher schedule). With a spread offense on the field vs a defense who can’t get off the field?  I'm still not sure why the line dropped, but I will take my chances with Ark St.

Lastly, UTSA -1.  
This Soza kid is ranked 20th in the country in passing (and this after playing OKST & Arizona).  Showers from UTEP is ranked 99th.  Ironically, this early in the season they have one common opponent; New Mexico.  Soza stats v NM: 21-34 237 yards 2 TDs and no picks.  They beat New Mexico 21-13 (on the road).  Showers v NM was 15/20 for 100 yards in a overtime loss (at home).  UTSA has 9 kids back on defense and 9 kids back on offense and have played back to back legit FBS schools, going against UTEP who has now played New Mexico and New Mexico St.  One would “assume” that the team speed UTSA is about to face is going to be much lower, and as a result, the game should slow WAY down for them.  I really like this play.  If UTSA can go on the road and beat New Mexico by 8, then can surely beat UTEP by 1. 

Good Luck Boom!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by rLp:

Regarding #3.

I will tell you what Michigan was doing; being stubborn.  Al Borges in content on finding a running game.  He insists on playing smashmouth football.  He (& Brady) want to "establish" a run game.  They took this game as a moment to try and do that.  Go back and watch the ND game, not many times did Michigan just line up and try & pound the rock into an 8 man box.  Instead, they had Gardner in the gun where he can be most effective.  
Now go back and watch the Akron game.  Time and time again they tried to run at an 8 man box.  And why not?  It's Arkon.  They tried to prove a point that they were going to "establish" the run. And time and time again they got the crap knocked out of them at the LOS.  This put Gardner in a TON of 2 & 11 & 3 & 12.  

If you go back and look at the play by play of this game you see A TON of Toussaint rush middle -1.  Toussaint rush middle -2 yards.  Toussaint rush middle 1 yard.  In almost every single one of Michigan drives they had at least 1 2nd & 11 or 3rd & 10 (or more!)  I don't care who you are playing, if you consistently put your quarterback in those situations all game long, its going to be tough.  The funny thing is; when Michigan REALLY needed to get going, they put Gardner in the gun and let his athletic ability take over running the read option (going back to DRob days).  They scored in about 3 to 4 plays both drives.

Until Borges can figure out that he has a poor mans Vince Young under center (and not Matt Ryan) they are going to look like this every single week.  In my opinion, Michigan deserved to lose that game, not only because the players took Akron lightly, but because the staff is stubborn and was trying to prove a point.  Borges doesn't have the Oline to just line up and play the way he wants to.    

Borges better start using his QB correctly (more of how he did in the ND game) or Michigan is going to lose a couple games they probably shouldn't.  Gardner can be dangerous running that read option play but Borges refuses to run that style offense.  He wants a smashmouth offense predicated on a one horse back carrying the load, and then throwing play action off of it. 

I like your picks Boom, especially Duke.  Their new QB was 3-14 on 3rd down conversions last week vs GTech.  I think the Savage kid is knocking of his rust & with Pitts defense, they should get that game.  

I also like Ark St -4 (although many people seem to be on them, which is kinda scary) but I started researching this game when the line came out (orginally at -6.5).  I couldn't believe it was dropping because I like Ark a lot.  After a closer look, one glaring stat stands out;  Ark State ranks 17th in the country in 3rd down conversions. Memphis defense ranked 115th on 3rd Down (and Ark has had the tougher schedule). With a spread offense on the field vs a defense who can’t get off the field?  I'm still not sure why the line dropped, but I will take my chances with Ark St.

Lastly, UTSA -1.  
This Soza kid is ranked 20th in the country in passing (and this after playing OKST & Arizona).  Showers from UTEP is ranked 99th.  Ironically, this early in the season they have one common opponent; New Mexico.  Soza stats v NM: 21-34 237 yards 2 TDs and no picks.  They beat New Mexico 21-13 (on the road).  Showers v NM was 15/20 for 100 yards in a overtime loss (at home).  UTSA has 9 kids back on defense and 9 kids back on offense and have played back to back legit FBS schools, going against UTEP who has now played New Mexico and New Mexico St.  One would “assume” that the team speed UTSA is about to face is going to be much lower, and as a result, the game should slow WAY down for them.  I really like this play.  If UTSA can go on the road and beat New Mexico by 8, then can surely beat UTEP by 1. 

Good Luck Boom!


damnit RLP.... where have you been? Without question one of the best posters on this site...

You are correct about Borges.... I agree.. Use the kids " Skill Set "...then he will really blossom into not only a better QB... But he will have tons of more confidence. Confidence is key playing the QB position..
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #144
adding :

V.T   -7

Houston  /  Rice   Over 63.5

Clemson - 7  1H




Plays so far..............



Maryland  -4.5

Pittsburgh  -4

Boise st   +3

Clemson  -13

Utah  +7

Mizz  /  Indiana  Over 71

V.T   -7

Houston  /  Rice   Over 63.5

Clemson - 7  1H



More to come.............
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 1396
Posted: #145
Hey boom clemson tt over 40 yea or nay.  Thanks for any input
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 1675
Posted: #146
what are you paying for VT-7 ?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #147
Clemson looked like garbage...

I deserved to loose my bet tonight....

Defense played well... Vic is a beast... But all in all, Clemson played flat and looked very bad. It is what it is.


But hey..... we would still walk the dog all over Florida.



Good night men
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1273
Posted: #148
You would not do crap against Florida. You could not even sustain drives against a "tough" NC State D. Give it up Doom, your conference sux as well as your team. The only hope the acc has is FSU or Miami, both in the Sunshine State. Deal with it, because once again, Clemson is way over rated. GL the rest of the year.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1273
Posted: #149
How did that 1st half bet on Clemson go for ya??? Let me tell ya, you lost.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #150
betS...compounded a bad bet (betting a (big) road favorite on a Thursday game) by adding the halftime.  Did the fact that it was Clemson have anything to do with it?  Probably.  You should stay away from betting with your emotions.

But I'm a troll and hater so what do I know?

Had to add the quip about Florida huh?  too predictable.  
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.