All Forums | College Football

*** Week 4 NCAA Football ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 42776
Posts: 193
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1717
Posted: #151
Clemson would not of beat Florida the way they played tonight. Had the refs not took back a clear TD by NC ST, they may not of even won this game. And to give up 4 straight 4th down conversions, that's just pitiful!!

Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Clemson looked like garbage...

I deserved to loose my bet tonight....

Defense played well... Vic is a beast... But all in all, Clemson played flat and looked very bad. It is what it is.


But hey..... we would still walk the dog all over Florida.



Good night men
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #152
Who cares if Florida would beat Clemson or viceversa? Such pointless arguing should be left in the beer hall..
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 16131
Posted: #153
Quote Originally Posted by ccbulldog:



Florida has given up 417 yards, on the SEASON. 

You can say whatever you want about Driskel but that defense is the baddest in the land yet again and will give them a chance to win every game left on the schedule.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 320
Posted: #154
Jwheels, 

As a FSU fan, couldnt agree more.  UF D is for real.  I like the addition of Valdez on offense too. Bad decisions by Driskel in the Miami game, overshadowed how stingy the D is. Looking forward to the game in Nov.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 7187
Posted: #155

I had doubts about Ohio St being able to be on the same field with Clemson... With Tonights game, Ohio St woulda worked Clemson...just my opinion...

Bet with your wallet,not your heart
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 65
Posted: #156
Any insight on Boise at Fresno?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #157
As I stated last night I was very disappointed in the effort that I seen.... Players looked sloppy, flat and little to complacent if you ask me..... but as I said, If you can show up and play your " D " game... ( and every team at some point will show there "D" game ) ......and still win by double digits ON THE ROAD..... Dont forget that last part... ON THE ROAD. Then all is not that bad. I think Clemson played bad enough for us to loose our bets.... wasn't upset at all about it.

Understand this tho for the children in the forum..... every team will not be as sharp as you would like every week.... hey, it's 18 - 22 year old kids. Consistency isn't a true staple in their life yet.... As Lou Holtz once said....  I coach a new team every week.....



adding :

Wake Forest  -2.5

Utah st  /  USC   Over 49.5

UL Monroe  +30.5

UNC  +6.5

N. Texas  /  Georgia   Under 67

Boise st   +3  1H 









Plays so far..............



Maryland  -4.5

Pittsburgh  -4

Boise st   +3

Clemson  -13

Utah  +7

Mizz  /  Indiana  Over 71

V.T   -7

Houston  /  Rice   Over 63.5

Clemson - 7  1H

Wake Forest  -2.5

Utah st  /  USC   Over 49.5

UL Monroe  +30.5

UNC  +6.5

N. Texas  /  Georgia   Under 67

Boise st   +3  1H 


GL this week men.............
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 6032
Posted: #158
bum bum your like what 10-28 by now ??????? 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54463
Posted: #159

Opposite of the USC total.

 

Talk to me about that UGA under. Ive been eyeing it, and already played NT +32.5......This looks like a 41-17 game imo

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 44
Posted: #160
[Quote: Originally Posted by Boom_Boom] As I stated last night I was very disappointed in the effort that I seen.... Players looked sloppy, flat and little to complacent if you ask me..... but as I said, If you can show up and play your " D " game... ( and every team at some point will show there "D" game ) ......and still win by double digits ON THE ROAD..... Dont forget that last part... ON THE ROAD. Then all is not that bad. I think Clemson played bad enough for us to loose our bets.... wasn't upset at all about it. 

Understand this tho for the children in the forum..... every team will not be as sharp as you would like every week.... hey, it's 18 - 22 year old kids. Consistency isn't a true staple in their life yet.... As Lou Holtz once said....  I coach a new team every week.....


"but as I said, If you can show up and play your " D " game... ( and every team at some point will show there "D" game )"

SO WHAT U SAYING IS ITS OK FOR CLEMSON TO PLAY THEIR D GAME AND WIN ON THE ROAD BUT NOT OK FOR BAMA TO WIN AFTER THEIR D GAME LAST WEEK ON THE ROAD SINCE U RIPPED THEM FOR YARDAGE ALLOWED?...I MEAN BOTH DID NOT COVER SPREAD!!


"Understand this tho for the children in the forum..... every team will not be as sharp as you would like every week.... hey, it's 18 - 22 year old kids. Consistency isn't a true staple in their life yet".

REALLY BOOMY U GOT THE NERVE TO USE THE WORD CONSISTENCY?...WHERE IS YOUR CONSISTENCY IN BAMA. AND CLEM. D GAMES ON THE ROAD

i dont think boomsy reads what he erites cause if he did he would actually realize his double standard toward sec teams...actually let me use his fav smileys!!....AND HE CALLS EVERYONE ELSE CHIDREN HAHAHAHAHA
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 89
Posted: #161
lmao, why does everyone get so serious over what Boom writes or thinks? I come here to read his "10 things we learned" and check out his picks to see if we like any of the same games. Some of you get so butt hurt over some of his comments. I disagree with a few things he says also but I don't piss and moan about it. Ultimately, we are here to post information/picks and help each other beat our bookie's behind and we are crying over someone being a smart behind or talking garbage about someone's favorite team. .  Light a dubey and lighten up people!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 89
Posted: #162

lmao, it turns the "A word" to behind!!! Didn't realize that

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 22444
Posted: #163
Good luck Boss!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 22698
Posted: #164
Good Luck!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 1645
Posted: #165

Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

As I stated last night I was very disappointed in the effort that I seen.... Players looked sloppy, flat and little to complacent if you ask me..... but as I said, If you can show up and play your " D " game... ( and every team at some point will show there "D" game ) ......and still win by double digits ON THE ROAD..... Dont forget that last part... ON THE ROAD. Then all is not that bad. I think Clemson played bad enough for us to loose our bets.... wasn't upset at all about it.

Understand this tho for the children in the forum..... every team will not be as sharp as you would like every week.... hey, it's 18 - 22 year old kids. Consistency isn't a true staple in their life yet.... As Lou Holtz once said....  I coach a new team every week.....



adding :

Wake Forest  -2.5

Utah st  /  USC   Over 49.5

UL Monroe  +30.5

UNC  +6.5

N. Texas  /  Georgia   Under 67

Boise st   +3  1H 









Plays so far..............



Maryland  -4.5

Pittsburgh  -4

Boise st   +3

Clemson  -13

Utah  +7

Mizz  /  Indiana  Over 71

V.T   -7

Houston  /  Rice   Over 63.5

Clemson - 7  1H

Wake Forest  -2.5

Utah st  /  USC   Over 49.5

UL Monroe  +30.5

UNC  +6.5

N. Texas  /  Georgia   Under 67

Boise st   +3  1H 


GL this week men.............

 

DUDE....

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 229
Posted: #166
Finally, someone else on ULM and not on Baylor!cheers

WTD
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6776
Posted: #167

VT -7??

How many points did you buy down?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54463
Posted: #168
Quote Originally Posted by SteamCave:

VT -7??

How many points did you buy down?

It was 7 all over the place yesterday

 

I got the juice count in my thread Boom...check it out.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #169
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

..... but as I said, If you can show up and play your " D " game... ( and every team at some point will show there "D" game ) ......and still win by double digits ON THE ROAD..... Dont forget that last part... ON THE ROAD. Then all is not that bad. I think Clemson played bad enough for us to loose our bets.... wasn't upset at all about it.

Understand this tho for the children in the forum..... every team will not be as sharp as you would like every week.... hey, it's 18 - 22 year old kids. Consistency isn't a true staple in their life yet.... As Lou Holtz once said....  I coach a new team every week.....




So that applies to Clemson and somehow is a positive but doesn't apply to Alabama?  Keep on Keepin on Boom.  Never gets old.  

GL, hope you don't "loose" too many bets.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6776
Posted: #170

I know it was yesterday, but he posted that play this evening, and at the time of the post it was around 9.5 on average

Does he not count juice??       LMAO 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54463
Posted: #171
Quote Originally Posted by SteamCave:

I know it was yesterday, but he posted that play this evening, and at the time of the post it was around 9.5 on average

Does he not count juice??       LMAO 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 44
Posted: #172
Quote Originally Posted by naesiy:


So that applies to Clemson and somehow is a positive but doesn't apply to Alabama?  Keep on Keepin on Boom.  Never gets old.  

GL, hope you don't "loose" too many bets.

....exactly as i posted....boomsy's double standard
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #173
Bama is #1 and should be #1. if u dont remeber they won back to back national titles and are undefeated this year. yes they let up aton of yards to manziel but they still kicked the sh it outta them. that game was never in doubt. Bama destroyed them. You can have ur biased toward SEC and hate on them all u want but Bama is once again the best team in country. i would side with vegas over you and they have Bama as 6.5 fav over oregon if they played on neutral. and no one else is as close as that. anyone who tries to take jabs at bama is just a hater.I live in northeast and am not even a bama fan but its clear as day who reigns over college football
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #174
all u gota say to people who hate on SEC. Not only does vegas disagree with you but NFL teams do to cuz if i heard correctly 63 players were drafted to nfl from SEC last yr the most of any conference ever. So yes when it comes to talent its not even close.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 77
Posted: #175
Anybody else sad that those ducks aren't around this week to give us a guarantee 1st halve and totals.
I never thought if say this but with Baylor and Oregon I might just take them for spread and totals every week until they finally let me down.. "If they finally let me down I mean"
Man what explosive offenses. I'm a damn buckeye fan but holy shart those ducks are hands down the best team in the country. That's just my opinion yo
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.