Whats your take on the CLEMSON game>???? Nobody is talking about it?
Are you fing BLIND??
You're kidding right? You cant be this stupid? It was a joke. It's called being facetious. I was one of the ones talking about Clemson in this thread there big guy...
Are you fing BLIND?
Nice use of the pacifier emoticon though. That really applied there. (I'm being facetious again) I think you were lookin for this guy:
(That's you, the confused guy. It's a better fit. It conveys confusion)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Cooler999:
Whats your take on the CLEMSON game>???? Nobody is talking about it?
Are you fing BLIND??
You're kidding right? You cant be this stupid? It was a joke. It's called being facetious. I was one of the ones talking about Clemson in this thread there big guy...
Are you fing BLIND?
Nice use of the pacifier emoticon though. That really applied there. (I'm being facetious again) I think you were lookin for this guy:
(That's you, the confused guy. It's a better fit. It conveys confusion)
You're kidding right? You cant be this stupid? It was a joke. It's called being facetious. I was one of the ones talking about Clemson in this thread there big guy...
Are you fing BLIND?
Nice use of the pacifier emoticon though. That really applied there. (I'm being facetious again) I think you were lookin for this guy:
(That's you, the confused guy. It's a better fit. It conveys confusion)
Hey, I completely missed the sarcasm.....so shoot me!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lucrative:
You're kidding right? You cant be this stupid? It was a joke. It's called being facetious. I was one of the ones talking about Clemson in this thread there big guy...
Are you fing BLIND?
Nice use of the pacifier emoticon though. That really applied there. (I'm being facetious again) I think you were lookin for this guy:
(That's you, the confused guy. It's a better fit. It conveys confusion)
Hey, I completely missed the sarcasm.....so shoot me!
I hit UF @14. Love that. LSU as a dd chalk in conference? I'll pay to see it.
Definitely like this play, I'm not sure LSU can put a beat down on UF like bama did. They don't have the offense. Do you think this line will move in florida's favor over the next day though? I'm sitting on it hoping to get a few more points...maybe up to 16. While it's not a monumental move, they're all worth a point.
BTW I posted a while ago about Clemson on upset alert. Went back and reread your OP and realized I had misread it. My bad.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:
I hit UF @14. Love that. LSU as a dd chalk in conference? I'll pay to see it.
Definitely like this play, I'm not sure LSU can put a beat down on UF like bama did. They don't have the offense. Do you think this line will move in florida's favor over the next day though? I'm sitting on it hoping to get a few more points...maybe up to 16. While it's not a monumental move, they're all worth a point.
BTW I posted a while ago about Clemson on upset alert. Went back and reread your OP and realized I had misread it. My bad.
Good thread/excellent read as usual Sizzle. I do however like Iowa. Pretty sure this game is a pk, and Penn St opened at -2.5 for hfa. I have watched a couple PSU games and really dont think they have the offense to compete with another decent/well coached team. I dont believe in traps/sharps/squares. I rely on my own eye test and experience. This line is dead on and people are sleeping on the Hawkeyes (mainly because they lost to Pitt, or they would be much more on the radar)....
bol as always
Iowa Hawkeyes lost to Pitt? Huh?
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Good thread/excellent read as usual Sizzle. I do however like Iowa. Pretty sure this game is a pk, and Penn St opened at -2.5 for hfa. I have watched a couple PSU games and really dont think they have the offense to compete with another decent/well coached team. I dont believe in traps/sharps/squares. I rely on my own eye test and experience. This line is dead on and people are sleeping on the Hawkeyes (mainly because they lost to Pitt, or they would be much more on the radar)....
Definitely like this play, I'm not sure LSU can put a beat down on UF like bama did. They don't have the offense. Do you think this line will move in florida's favor over the next day though? I'm sitting on it hoping to get a few more points...maybe up to 16. While it's not a monumental move, they're all worth a point.
BTW I posted a while ago about Clemson on upset alert. Went back and reread your OP and realized I had misread it. My bad.
If Florida had beaten Bama or at least played them close, they would have been catching only about 6 in Baton Rouge, in which case I would have bet big on LSU.
This Florida team doesn't have a deep passing game anyways, so the loss of QB Brantley is of minimal concern.
They do however, lead all of NCAAF in runs of 10+ yards this year and that's what will keep them within earshot, along with their underrated defense, which simply was on the field too long last week.
Rare that I would pull a 180 in 1 week, but the Gators have gone from a potential must-fade to a definite must-play.
0
Quote Originally Posted by whevans:
Definitely like this play, I'm not sure LSU can put a beat down on UF like bama did. They don't have the offense. Do you think this line will move in florida's favor over the next day though? I'm sitting on it hoping to get a few more points...maybe up to 16. While it's not a monumental move, they're all worth a point.
BTW I posted a while ago about Clemson on upset alert. Went back and reread your OP and realized I had misread it. My bad.
If Florida had beaten Bama or at least played them close, they would have been catching only about 6 in Baton Rouge, in which case I would have bet big on LSU.
This Florida team doesn't have a deep passing game anyways, so the loss of QB Brantley is of minimal concern.
They do however, lead all of NCAAF in runs of 10+ yards this year and that's what will keep them within earshot, along with their underrated defense, which simply was on the field too long last week.
Rare that I would pull a 180 in 1 week, but the Gators have gone from a potential must-fade to a definite must-play.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
