Been combing the burs out of the mules tail looking at this weekends slate of insanity. To me, that Zona-UCLA game sticks out like a dogs balls. I look at the schedules played etc. The defensive numbers Total D, Rush D, Pass D, Points Allowed, yds/play blah, blah, blah give a very slight edge to the Teddy Bruins. The offensive numbers show a significant edge for the Mildcats. As you know Zona's offensive output was put up by Tate minus the last 3 quarters last week when the backup came in for 2 series and then Rhett Rod got his chance.
My view is Zona's O just got upgraded because RRod is simply a better passer than Tate. The kid looked like he belonged, had moxy, showed lots of poise and man was he under fire from that Ute D. He put up some impressive numbers in that second half against a great defense. Basically these two teams are about even on paper statistically.
I'm not knocking Kahlil but he just wasn't working out under Sumlin's system. He was fine in Rich Rod's spread option.
I saw this line open last Sunday at Zona -1 which is about what I figured because I had it figured as a pick 'em game. (With Tate playing) Next thing I see it is 5.5 due to Tate out, then 7, and now 10 and players are still bangin' the h%ll out of it. You would probably prefer a bigger sample, which is understandable. Y'all are playing small ball this week, for good reason I might add, so I'm not suggesting a play like Iowa St last week.
I just think this line is out of whack now due to heavy action so far on the Bruins which I believe is an overreaction to the injury report. To me, no player is worth 11 points, especially Tate. Originally (with Tate) I figured this game as a toss up, closely contested throughout, with the Chipsters eeking a win out at home.
But I now think the Cats have a shot at the win with the Rhett Rod upgrade (like Purdy was for the Cyclones) and the 2 score impost is a bonus. I'm not reccomending you add this to your short list. But I'm going to take a small stab with the Zona Cats.
Of course they all look good on paper before kickoff. Lol
Best of luck to you 2 cats this weekend. Don't forget the catnip.
If you can't close you can't cover.
0
WahooS Train
Been combing the burs out of the mules tail looking at this weekends slate of insanity. To me, that Zona-UCLA game sticks out like a dogs balls. I look at the schedules played etc. The defensive numbers Total D, Rush D, Pass D, Points Allowed, yds/play blah, blah, blah give a very slight edge to the Teddy Bruins. The offensive numbers show a significant edge for the Mildcats. As you know Zona's offensive output was put up by Tate minus the last 3 quarters last week when the backup came in for 2 series and then Rhett Rod got his chance.
My view is Zona's O just got upgraded because RRod is simply a better passer than Tate. The kid looked like he belonged, had moxy, showed lots of poise and man was he under fire from that Ute D. He put up some impressive numbers in that second half against a great defense. Basically these two teams are about even on paper statistically.
I'm not knocking Kahlil but he just wasn't working out under Sumlin's system. He was fine in Rich Rod's spread option.
I saw this line open last Sunday at Zona -1 which is about what I figured because I had it figured as a pick 'em game. (With Tate playing) Next thing I see it is 5.5 due to Tate out, then 7, and now 10 and players are still bangin' the h%ll out of it. You would probably prefer a bigger sample, which is understandable. Y'all are playing small ball this week, for good reason I might add, so I'm not suggesting a play like Iowa St last week.
I just think this line is out of whack now due to heavy action so far on the Bruins which I believe is an overreaction to the injury report. To me, no player is worth 11 points, especially Tate. Originally (with Tate) I figured this game as a toss up, closely contested throughout, with the Chipsters eeking a win out at home.
But I now think the Cats have a shot at the win with the Rhett Rod upgrade (like Purdy was for the Cyclones) and the 2 score impost is a bonus. I'm not reccomending you add this to your short list. But I'm going to take a small stab with the Zona Cats.
Of course they all look good on paper before kickoff. Lol
Best of luck to you 2 cats this weekend. Don't forget the catnip.
Been combing the burs out of the mules tail looking at this weekends slate of insanity. To me, that Zona-UCLA game sticks out like a dogs balls. I look at the schedules played etc. The defensive numbers Total D, Rush D, Pass D, Points Allowed, yds/play blah, blah, blah give a very slight edge to the Teddy Bruins. The offensive numbers show a significant edge for the Mildcats. As you know Zona's offensive output was put up by Tate minus the last 3 quarters last week when the backup came in for 2 series and then Rhett Rod got his chance.
My view is Zona's O just got upgraded because RRod is simply a better passer than Tate. The kid looked like he belonged, had moxy, showed lots of poise and man was he under fire from that Ute D. He put up some impressive numbers in that second half against a great defense. Basically these two teams are about even on paper statistically.
I'm not knocking Kahlil but he just wasn't working out under Sumlin's system. He was fine in Rich Rod's spread option.
I saw this line open last Sunday at Zona -1 which is about what I figured because I had it figured as a pick 'em game. (With Tate playing) Next thing I see it is 5.5 due to Tate out, then 7, and now 10 and players are still bangin' the h%ll out of it. You would probably prefer a bigger sample, which is understandable. Y'all are playing small ball this week, for good reason I might add, so I'm not suggesting a play like Iowa St last week.
I just think this line is out of whack now due to heavy action so far on the Bruins which I believe is an overreaction to the injury report. To me, no player is worth 11 points, especially Tate. Originally (with Tate) I figured this game as a toss up, closely contested throughout, with the Chipsters eeking a win out at home.
But I now think the Cats have a shot at the win with the Rhett Rod upgrade (like Purdy was for the Cyclones) and the 2 score impost is a bonus. I'm not reccomending you add this to your short list. But I'm going to take a small stab with the Zona Cats.
Of course they all look good on paper before kickoff. Lol
Best of luck to you 2 cats this weekend. Don't forget the catnip.
Great post brother. I agree with most if not all of that. I wouldnt bet UCLA -7.5, but I think they can win at home. A week of thinking about this game and playing on the road will be a big test Rod Jr.....
Gl brother
0
Quote Originally Posted by FunKyRufus:
WahooS Train
Been combing the burs out of the mules tail looking at this weekends slate of insanity. To me, that Zona-UCLA game sticks out like a dogs balls. I look at the schedules played etc. The defensive numbers Total D, Rush D, Pass D, Points Allowed, yds/play blah, blah, blah give a very slight edge to the Teddy Bruins. The offensive numbers show a significant edge for the Mildcats. As you know Zona's offensive output was put up by Tate minus the last 3 quarters last week when the backup came in for 2 series and then Rhett Rod got his chance.
My view is Zona's O just got upgraded because RRod is simply a better passer than Tate. The kid looked like he belonged, had moxy, showed lots of poise and man was he under fire from that Ute D. He put up some impressive numbers in that second half against a great defense. Basically these two teams are about even on paper statistically.
I'm not knocking Kahlil but he just wasn't working out under Sumlin's system. He was fine in Rich Rod's spread option.
I saw this line open last Sunday at Zona -1 which is about what I figured because I had it figured as a pick 'em game. (With Tate playing) Next thing I see it is 5.5 due to Tate out, then 7, and now 10 and players are still bangin' the h%ll out of it. You would probably prefer a bigger sample, which is understandable. Y'all are playing small ball this week, for good reason I might add, so I'm not suggesting a play like Iowa St last week.
I just think this line is out of whack now due to heavy action so far on the Bruins which I believe is an overreaction to the injury report. To me, no player is worth 11 points, especially Tate. Originally (with Tate) I figured this game as a toss up, closely contested throughout, with the Chipsters eeking a win out at home.
But I now think the Cats have a shot at the win with the Rhett Rod upgrade (like Purdy was for the Cyclones) and the 2 score impost is a bonus. I'm not reccomending you add this to your short list. But I'm going to take a small stab with the Zona Cats.
Of course they all look good on paper before kickoff. Lol
Best of luck to you 2 cats this weekend. Don't forget the catnip.
Great post brother. I agree with most if not all of that. I wouldnt bet UCLA -7.5, but I think they can win at home. A week of thinking about this game and playing on the road will be a big test Rod Jr.....
Checks and balances. If unchecked, I am a maniac. Sometimes thats a good thing....sometimes not so much.
agree, hindsight always a good capper as well
I’ve sat out weeks I would have gone 10-2, just part of it
Just try to avoid the “mindfuk” & second guessing & stick to your program , I’m a bit burnt feeling this week, like I need a breather all of a sudden , hit me like Monday , happens every year if I read way too much info for consecutive weeks, it’s why I gave up college hoops & I smashed in that sport, I can’t do it like I once could
Age
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Checks and balances. If unchecked, I am a maniac. Sometimes thats a good thing....sometimes not so much.
agree, hindsight always a good capper as well
I’ve sat out weeks I would have gone 10-2, just part of it
Just try to avoid the “mindfuk” & second guessing & stick to your program , I’m a bit burnt feeling this week, like I need a breather all of a sudden , hit me like Monday , happens every year if I read way too much info for consecutive weeks, it’s why I gave up college hoops & I smashed in that sport, I can’t do it like I once could
I’ve sat out weeks I would have gone 10-2, just part of it
Just try to avoid the “mindfuk” & second guessing & stick to your program , I’m a bit burnt feeling this week, like I need a breather all of a sudden , hit me like Monday , happens every year if I read way too much info for consecutive weeks, it’s why I gave up college hoops & I smashed in that sport, I can’t do it like I once could
Age
I'm in that same mode... too much every day. I backed off Monday-Tuesday and dug into a few Wed/Thurs. Picked 3, got 2 more likely for tomorrow. Nice little break.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
agree, hindsight always a good capper as well
I’ve sat out weeks I would have gone 10-2, just part of it
Just try to avoid the “mindfuk” & second guessing & stick to your program , I’m a bit burnt feeling this week, like I need a breather all of a sudden , hit me like Monday , happens every year if I read way too much info for consecutive weeks, it’s why I gave up college hoops & I smashed in that sport, I can’t do it like I once could
Age
I'm in that same mode... too much every day. I backed off Monday-Tuesday and dug into a few Wed/Thurs. Picked 3, got 2 more likely for tomorrow. Nice little break.
this is just ugly enough I could consider that QB that just beat TCU is so bad, he’s surely good for 2 turnovers, if TCU would have cared they’d win against that kid
is it certain the stud is still out with lung issue? because if he plays they’ll thump KU
Yeah bubble boy is out and guy the announcers were drooling over for no reason is in.... Last time Kansas won a B-12 roadie all the banks were collapsing ... now it's the bookie's turn ....
In other news... 25mph wind for Iowa but literally only during the game... I think it's a sign.... that the MD QB will somehow be less accurate... I hope..
Good luck tomorrow!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
this is just ugly enough I could consider that QB that just beat TCU is so bad, he’s surely good for 2 turnovers, if TCU would have cared they’d win against that kid
is it certain the stud is still out with lung issue? because if he plays they’ll thump KU
Yeah bubble boy is out and guy the announcers were drooling over for no reason is in.... Last time Kansas won a B-12 roadie all the banks were collapsing ... now it's the bookie's turn ....
In other news... 25mph wind for Iowa but literally only during the game... I think it's a sign.... that the MD QB will somehow be less accurate... I hope..
Wahoo, did you post your initial leans/picks just what you liked from initially looking at the lines? I know you did last week and you absolutely killed it.....you must've been like 10-3 and you actually mentioned that you usually did well with your initial gut reaction
TIA and goodluck today
0
Wahoo, did you post your initial leans/picks just what you liked from initially looking at the lines? I know you did last week and you absolutely killed it.....you must've been like 10-3 and you actually mentioned that you usually did well with your initial gut reaction
Mizz was the deal, spot of the year type setup, made everyone’s card except for some I saw add Memphis
I’ll be taking a nice break I’m thinking so you’ll have to pull your own weight next week my friend, I got the reads going right now but too exhausted to keep going
need a few strippers & a few weeks off
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
U was dead on with the OU/TCU total brother
still my bro
Mizz was the deal, spot of the year type setup, made everyone’s card except for some I saw add Memphis
I’ll be taking a nice break I’m thinking so you’ll have to pull your own weight next week my friend, I got the reads going right now but too exhausted to keep going
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.