lets get a football pic in
I already said in this thread whether this wager would count. Read through all the pages. Purdue does count. It will be added when the bowl season ends.
And as far as Hillary, I never made an official pick anywhere where I said take Hillary -300. I said repeatedly I HAD HER for -300 and -200 and -165 etc. like a stock.
And I've told you this Hugh but you are too dense to understand it:
How the hell would I count a -300 winner or losing in a straight up WL record??????
I didn't count the Joey Chestnut but for the same reason. He went off at -155.
And I didn't count countless pro wrestling winners for the same reason.
You keep trying to make the Clinton bet sully my record but if I counted all my exotics in my record over the past year or several years it would improve it (immensely). So you have to stop making yourself look like a fool continuing to say this (because I've repeated this to you several dozen times...because you've said it several dozen times).
This +125 winner or loser WILL COUNT as ONE win or loss. If she was going off at -155 like Rousey I would say I wouldn't count it BECAUSE NO ONE needs a cap on a -155 play and they certainly don't need posters here adding a full win to their record for winning such a play.
I already said in this thread whether this wager would count. Read through all the pages. Purdue does count. It will be added when the bowl season ends.
And as far as Hillary, I never made an official pick anywhere where I said take Hillary -300. I said repeatedly I HAD HER for -300 and -200 and -165 etc. like a stock.
And I've told you this Hugh but you are too dense to understand it:
How the hell would I count a -300 winner or losing in a straight up WL record??????
I didn't count the Joey Chestnut but for the same reason. He went off at -155.
And I didn't count countless pro wrestling winners for the same reason.
You keep trying to make the Clinton bet sully my record but if I counted all my exotics in my record over the past year or several years it would improve it (immensely). So you have to stop making yourself look like a fool continuing to say this (because I've repeated this to you several dozen times...because you've said it several dozen times).
This +125 winner or loser WILL COUNT as ONE win or loss. If she was going off at -155 like Rousey I would say I wouldn't count it BECAUSE NO ONE needs a cap on a -155 play and they certainly don't need posters here adding a full win to their record for winning such a play.
I already said in this thread whether this wager would count. Read through all the pages. Purdue does count. It will be added when the bowl season ends.
And as far as Hillary, I never made an official pick anywhere where I said take Hillary -300. I said repeatedly I HAD HER for -300 and -200 and -165 etc. like a stock.
And I've told you this Hugh but you are too dense to understand it:
How the hell would I count a -300 winner or losing in a straight up WL record??????
I didn't count the Joey Chestnut but for the same reason. He went off at -155.
And I didn't count countless pro wrestling winners for the same reason.
You keep trying to make the Clinton bet sully my record but if I counted all my exotics in my record over the past year or several years it would improve it (immensely). So you have to stop making yourself look like a fool continuing to say this (because I've repeated this to you several dozen times...because you've said it several dozen times).
This +125 winner or loser WILL COUNT as ONE win or loss. If she was going off at -155 like Rousey I would say I wouldn't count it BECAUSE NO ONE needs a cap on a -155 play and they certainly don't need posters here adding a full win to their record for winning such a play.
I already said in this thread whether this wager would count. Read through all the pages. Purdue does count. It will be added when the bowl season ends.
And as far as Hillary, I never made an official pick anywhere where I said take Hillary -300. I said repeatedly I HAD HER for -300 and -200 and -165 etc. like a stock.
And I've told you this Hugh but you are too dense to understand it:
How the hell would I count a -300 winner or losing in a straight up WL record??????
I didn't count the Joey Chestnut but for the same reason. He went off at -155.
And I didn't count countless pro wrestling winners for the same reason.
You keep trying to make the Clinton bet sully my record but if I counted all my exotics in my record over the past year or several years it would improve it (immensely). So you have to stop making yourself look like a fool continuing to say this (because I've repeated this to you several dozen times...because you've said it several dozen times).
This +125 winner or loser WILL COUNT as ONE win or loss. If she was going off at -155 like Rousey I would say I wouldn't count it BECAUSE NO ONE needs a cap on a -155 play and they certainly don't need posters here adding a full win to their record for winning such a play.
Why do you care to keep pointing that out? How do my parlays affect anyone's bets here? I never posted those parlays and told people to tail them.
No one needs me to tell them to take a massive favorite in Hillary and it took the greatest upset in over a century to take her out. Upsets happen. Sometimes you are on the wrong side of them.
And my record will continue to be questioned. Because the people questioning do not use a search tool and also my record stretches back over a year.
I post, I add a win or a loss and give a write-up. I'm meaningful to this forum, win or lose. Because at a bare minimum I start a conversation. And if you tailed me, you are at 64%.
For those questioning my record, not a single one has been able to prove otherwise outside of a typo here or there which is quickly corrected on the spot (Ganda and the kid who plays in high stakes cash games did this and I thanked them).
If covers had every game on it's streak for survivor tracker, I'd gladly put every play in there but they don't. So I'm left to posting a record with a number that's typed on a screen and nothing more.
Of course it will be suspect to posters. It's fuc*** good.
The proof is in the pudding. If people have lost a ton of money following me they'll say so. The fact is, it's the opposite. People have tailed me for years and have openly stated many times they've made money off me.
Again, I say this openly and gladly, if you think my record is false, go back through every post you can find and you will see +1 win or +1 loss in every post. If you see something different tell me. I don't need to spend time verifying my record WHEN I'M THE ONE POSTING detailed write-ups and tracking it accordingly and accurately. YOU are making the accusation so you spend the time going after something that doesn't exist.
Why do you care to keep pointing that out? How do my parlays affect anyone's bets here? I never posted those parlays and told people to tail them.
No one needs me to tell them to take a massive favorite in Hillary and it took the greatest upset in over a century to take her out. Upsets happen. Sometimes you are on the wrong side of them.
And my record will continue to be questioned. Because the people questioning do not use a search tool and also my record stretches back over a year.
I post, I add a win or a loss and give a write-up. I'm meaningful to this forum, win or lose. Because at a bare minimum I start a conversation. And if you tailed me, you are at 64%.
For those questioning my record, not a single one has been able to prove otherwise outside of a typo here or there which is quickly corrected on the spot (Ganda and the kid who plays in high stakes cash games did this and I thanked them).
If covers had every game on it's streak for survivor tracker, I'd gladly put every play in there but they don't. So I'm left to posting a record with a number that's typed on a screen and nothing more.
Of course it will be suspect to posters. It's fuc*** good.
The proof is in the pudding. If people have lost a ton of money following me they'll say so. The fact is, it's the opposite. People have tailed me for years and have openly stated many times they've made money off me.
Again, I say this openly and gladly, if you think my record is false, go back through every post you can find and you will see +1 win or +1 loss in every post. If you see something different tell me. I don't need to spend time verifying my record WHEN I'M THE ONE POSTING detailed write-ups and tracking it accordingly and accurately. YOU are making the accusation so you spend the time going after something that doesn't exist.
And you'll see it in my 2017 record. I'll add a win or a loss just like I always do from 0-0 and you can jump in whenever you think that record has been falsified.
And it won't be. I have nothing to lie about. I am not a tout. I have no reason to want people believe I have a better record than I do because it does nothing for me. I don't make money off these write-ups and I only post here, to start a conversation (learn some things from alternative viewpoints) and have people follow if they'd like.
And I want them to win, because the more they win, the closer I get to Steve Wynn spit-shining my dress shoes.
And you'll see it in my 2017 record. I'll add a win or a loss just like I always do from 0-0 and you can jump in whenever you think that record has been falsified.
And it won't be. I have nothing to lie about. I am not a tout. I have no reason to want people believe I have a better record than I do because it does nothing for me. I don't make money off these write-ups and I only post here, to start a conversation (learn some things from alternative viewpoints) and have people follow if they'd like.
And I want them to win, because the more they win, the closer I get to Steve Wynn spit-shining my dress shoes.
And as far as Hillary goes, I was playing with a lot of house money off her since I had a clean sweep on her DNC speech prop phrases.
Totally swept them. Several at +ML money. And I posted none of that to my record.
Because the point wasn't to improve my record. It was to get people the same information I had and get them on the winning side. And I know you saw those threads because you're all over the GD forum so don't act like you have no idea what I'm talking about. And if you want to dispute what I'm saying the search tool is right there.
And as far as Hillary goes, I was playing with a lot of house money off her since I had a clean sweep on her DNC speech prop phrases.
Totally swept them. Several at +ML money. And I posted none of that to my record.
Because the point wasn't to improve my record. It was to get people the same information I had and get them on the winning side. And I know you saw those threads because you're all over the GD forum so don't act like you have no idea what I'm talking about. And if you want to dispute what I'm saying the search tool is right there.
And by the way, not that there are dunces here who need to be told this but the:
Merry Christmas Scal bullshi* is about as authentic as Robert Dinero buying a round of drinks for the "Go get your shinebox" mobster. We saw what happened to him when the bar closed.
But I'm ready for that shi*.
It's to keep the Mods at bay so he can feign a "Who me? I just wanted to wish him Merry Christmas!!" so they won't throw him in the hole again for a month.
And by the way, not that there are dunces here who need to be told this but the:
Merry Christmas Scal bullshi* is about as authentic as Robert Dinero buying a round of drinks for the "Go get your shinebox" mobster. We saw what happened to him when the bar closed.
But I'm ready for that shi*.
It's to keep the Mods at bay so he can feign a "Who me? I just wanted to wish him Merry Christmas!!" so they won't throw him in the hole again for a month.
Well here is Nunes saying she is 100% and that her sinus infection has gone away.
Of course it is her saying it but she looks good. Weigh ins will confirm everything but I liked what I say from this vantage point:
Well here is Nunes saying she is 100% and that her sinus infection has gone away.
Of course it is her saying it but she looks good. Weigh ins will confirm everything but I liked what I say from this vantage point:
And by the way, not that there are dunces here who need to be told this but the:
Merry Christmas Scal bullshi* is about as authentic as Robert Dinero buying a round of drinks for the "Go get your shinebox" mobster. We saw what happened to him when the bar closed.
But I'm ready for that shi*.
It's to keep the Mods at bay so he can feign a "Who me? I just wanted to wish him Merry Christmas!!" so they won't throw him in the hole again for a month.
And by the way, not that there are dunces here who need to be told this but the:
Merry Christmas Scal bullshi* is about as authentic as Robert Dinero buying a round of drinks for the "Go get your shinebox" mobster. We saw what happened to him when the bar closed.
But I'm ready for that shi*.
It's to keep the Mods at bay so he can feign a "Who me? I just wanted to wish him Merry Christmas!!" so they won't throw him in the hole again for a month.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.