All Forums | College Football

Cincinnati at Louisville (10/26/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 17105
Posts: 77
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Cincinnati [3-2 ATS]
Home:  Louisville [3-4 ATS]

Game Time: 8:00 PM
Stadium: Papa John's Cardinal Stadium

Recent Meetings:
10/15/11 - LOU 16 vs. CIN 25
10/15/10 - CIN 35 vs. LOU 27
10/24/09 - LOU 10 vs. CIN 41

Team Leaders:

Cincinnati:
Passing: Munchie Legaux (1435)
Rushing: George Winn (607)
Receiving: Travis Kelce (286)

Louisville:
Passing: Teddy Bridgewater (1694)
Rushing: Senorise Perry (588)
Receiving: DeVante Parker (337)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 20794
Posted: #2

Cincinnati - 28                                          Louisville - 23

Bearcats +4                                     under 54

L'ville living on borrowed time. Cincy loves playing the role of the spoiler....The Bulls softened up the Cards, now the Bearcats finish them off.

Cincinnati - Under

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #3

    Agreeing with the Colonel here. Bearcats appear to have a shot and at least keep it close.

CINCINNATI  + 4

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 271
Posted: #4
I have no idea what kind of road team Cincinnati is because they've played just one game away and lost it against an inferior team.  Louisville has won both at home and away.  Louisville's yards/pass against similar competition has been above 10, which should carry over to this game.  This line will probably drop to 3.5, at which point Louisville looks like a good bet.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 310
Posted: #5
Early lean on Cincinnati 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1218
Posted: #6
It's going to be hard to go against a qb named munchie
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Topo:

I have no idea what kind of road team Cincinnati is because they've played just one game away and lost it against an inferior team.  Louisville has won both at home and away.  Louisville's yards/pass against similar competition has been above 10, which should carry over to this game.  This line will probably drop to 3.5, at which point Louisville looks like a good bet.

They played a neutral site game vs Vtech at fedex field that was 90% hokie fans.  They looked good, dealt with the crowd noise.  Their defense will keep this close.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 948
Posted: #8

@unchoop15 - VaTech isn't very good, as we now know. Louisville is battle tested, and at home.

Lousville -3.5

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 641
Posted: #9

Cincy loss to fuckin Toledo...Enough said.

Louisville -3.5 LARGE!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1204
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by InVegas:

@unchoop15 - VaTech isn't very good, as we now know. Louisville is battle tested, and at home.

Lousville -3.5


Battle tested by whom, a 2-5 S.Fla team, an 0-7 So. Miss team, a 1-7 Fla. Int team?  In none of these games could they cover the spread.  I wouldn't trust this team to cover anything more than a FG. In fact, I could see Cincinatti winning this game as they have proven year after year, that they can go on the road and play spoiler in the weak ass big east.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1204
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Nhenley:

Cincy loss to fuckin Toledo...Enough said.

Louisville -3.5 LARGE!!!


Toledo is 7-1 with their only loss in their first game of the season @ AZ in OT.  Though I didn't see the game, I'm guessing this was a classic "look ahead" to a conference foe... 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1895
Posted: #12
 Neither Lou or Cincy playing a monster schedule but the BCS needs some teams to go down soon... so Lou, sorry your next. CIN and OV for the large!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 948
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by wasabitobiko:


Toledo is 7-1 with their only loss in their first game of the season @ AZ in OT.  Though I didn't see the game, I'm guessing this was a classic "look ahead" to a conference foe... 

Nice angle, but you ignore the obvious - S Fl. was off a bye and Louisville was in "look ahead" mode as well. 'Ville went on the road and beat Pitt in Pitt, after Pitt destroyed Va Tech (whom Cinci barely held on to beat).

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 89
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by wasabitobiko:


Toledo is 7-1 with their only loss in their first game of the season @ AZ in OT.  Though I didn't see the game, I'm guessing this was a classic "look ahead" to a conference foe... 
Toledo is a solid team... If they didnt get a 72 yard pick 6 and a 90 yard kick return Cincy wins that game!!! I also like cincy in this game they seem to have the better over all team!! Louisville could have easily lost at Toledo also!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5818
Posted: #15
With the Cardinals giving 3 at home this amounts to nothing more than a pick em. With 61% of the public on Louie and the line moving the other way, looks to me that the sharp money is coming in on Cincy. And the Bearcats have the better offensive numbers, with almost as good a defense.  With that being said;

Put me down for Cincy +3.5 / buying the hook I think. 

Make any sense?   
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 1428
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by bkg1010:

With the Cardinals giving 3 at home this amounts to nothing more than a pick em. With 61% of the public on Louie and the line moving the other way, looks to me that the sharp money is coming in on Cincy. And the Bearcats have the better offensive numbers, with almost as good a defense.  With that being said;

Put me down for Cincy +3.5 / buying the hook I think. 

Make any sense?   
Makes every bit of sense 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 48
Posted: #17
Concerns me that this is just UC's 2nd road game(I know they played a neutral site game). Both teams have played a shit schedule to this point, and both have struggled against lesser competition(UL struggled with USF, Southern Miss, and FIU. While UC struggled with Delaware St and Fordham). 

I think UC has the edge here, particularly on defense. They've forced 13 TO's so far, and get good pressure on the QB, averaging 3 sacks/gm and UL allows 2/gm.

I think the difference in the game will be special teams, where these 2 teams are way far apart. UC is far superior in all aspects. UL is almost dead last in net punting, and are dreadful in punt/kick returns. 

UC +3.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3283
Posted: #18
IM NOT OVERTHINKING THIS ONE.GIMME LOUISVILLE AT HOME-1-163@HERITAGE.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3864
Posted: #19

Quote Originally Posted by Topo:

I have no idea what kind of road team Cincinnati is because they've played just one game away and lost it against an inferior team.  Louisville has won both at home and away.  Louisville's yards/pass against similar competition has been above 10, which should carry over to this game.  This line will probably drop to 3.5, at which point Louisville looks like a good bet.

 Virginia Tech was a road game, so that makes 2

Cincy got a wake up call last week @ Toledo, Butch Jones is a GREAT coach, he'll have the troops ready

Cincy +3

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 6784
Posted: #20
Cincinnati +3.5 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 426
Posted: #21
CARDINALS -2.5 again buying it down (1000 units)

Cinncy lost to TOLEDO and that was their first away game.. So that tells me I can't put my money on a team only on its 2nd road game too much of a risk and I really think cards win by +6 
GL 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #22
Early lean on Cincy.. These teams both know each other very well
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 950
Posted: #23
Everyone keeps screaming about losing to Toledo BUT hold on a sec..Toldeo is 7-1 overall,tied for first in W Mac,4-0 in conf AND 6-2 ATS.Guys this isnt the Toledo of old.Granted they arent Alabama but they are producing and playing some solid games.Im not overly impressed by either team or the strength of their schedules (or lack there of) BUT the biggest difference I see off hand is Cinci does have a better total yardage package and much better rushing effort.Give me Cinci +3 1/2 and U52.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 133
Posted: #24
2-0 last night Clemson under and Tampa over return tonight Cardinals -7 , I already posted last night who ever took WF must go sleep at half time and I also said WF scored 13 points and Clemson score at least 38 points. Good luck.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 936
Posted: #25
the evil eye 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.