All Forums | College Football

North Carolina State at Rutgers (12/29/2008)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 8939
Posts: 145
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 3672
Posted: #126
i need a miracle td
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #127
 oops...let me grab your face mask because I am frustrated that my offense gave this one away...lol...1st and Goal.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #128
Congrats to all who won!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 46
Posted: #129
I tihnk you're pretty much dead on, FPronk. Although, I don't think Rutgers is going to get the TD here. So you may still cover.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 286
Posted: #130
Fpronk, looks like you may be congratulating yourself!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 216
Posted: #131
I just noticed I actually got the over at 51 , when it first posted. Lucky me, I put this in so long ago i forgot what number I got. Talk about early value.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1142
Posted: #132
Grind it out Rutgers. Act like you won the super bowl too. If NC's QB is in you are burried.  Knights didn't show much 2day.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1108
Posted: #133
jesus fpronk - you got your cover...relax

rutgers was moving the ball in the first half as well with wilson in....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 86
Posted: #134
Well I covered my overs.. but had they made some kicks earlier in the game I would have won my Rutgers -6. 

And yes it does suck that Wilson came out for all you NC backers.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 46
Posted: #135
Well, Rutgers' red zone offense was pathetic, A push...how unsatisfying.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1108
Posted: #136
there you go fpronk - i love how ncstate dominated the game, yet rutgers had more total yards..lol
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #137
What an unreal cover and under..I was sure this was a loser once that QB went out. WOW! Too bad for those NC State kids..they played a better game and deserved the W.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1108
Posted: #138
can somebody answer me as to what happened to the ncstate qb, or was that too normal a question? lol
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #139
Quote Originally Posted by agent0:

jesus fpronk - you got your cover...relax

rutgers was moving the ball in the first half as well with wilson in....

Agent, they did dominate the game...let's look how well NC State's DEF played when they weren't on the field for 10 minutes in the 3Q because of crappy QB play. The got all their yards in the second half. Rutgers best scoring drive came on their last TD after a NC State score other than that they had short field from the 1Q fumble when they got six on a fake FG. Other than that second to last drive NC State did dominate...especially in the red zone.

I'm not going to argue with you but I feel they did dominate that game with their starting QB in. Anyone else have an opinion...I'd love to hear it.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #140
Quote Originally Posted by agent0:

can somebody answer me as to what happened to the ncstate qb, or was that too normal a question? lol

I answered...lol ...it was apart of my rant... He sprained his knee.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #141
I believe I said..."NC State dominated this game until Wilson sprained his knee."
 
Yes, Rutgers got more yards and had the ball more but this was after the QB went.
 
Good Luck with the late game!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1108
Posted: #142
i just read the boxscore and it didnt appear to be a one sided game.  nice hit
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #143
Thanks...too bad you switched on your UNDER play. Were you able to watch the game?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1108
Posted: #144
no, i was at work, and basically switched b/c we were so slow today that i had extra time to over analyze the game like a jackass...lol

i guess if the ncstate qb was in, they would have scored more than one td in the 2nd half - so i guess it wasnt an awful switch.  bottom line, it was a loser though

i could have swore rutgers had more total yards at the half - i could be wrong...
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 326
Posted: #145
Wow, this one was a pure coin flip, I lucked out and got NCST at +7 -120, and Under 58, but I'm sure there's some people that had the same side but a bad number, cest la vie en merde or something....
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.