All Forums | College Football

UCLA at Stanford (11/30/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13412
Posts: 62
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 1730
Posted: #51

UCLA

YTD: 66-49-1 (57.4%)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 1428
Posted: #52
UCLA didnt lay down they playrd a team with a defense ..noy used to that ..so its Stanford -9.5 u 47.5
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 566
Posted: #53

Quote Originally Posted by ApocalypseLater:


I

there's a difference between not trying and not being motivated... and even though it seems small... it ISN'T. . .

I CANT EVER REMEMBER NOT BEING MOTIVATED IN ANY GAME.  REGARDLESS OF WHO'S ON DECK, YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1210
Posted: #54

Attack on Stanford!

Made good profits with Stanford as a "Power Play" vs. UCLA last week!  But now, will try to reverse the play and run with UCLA!

Generally, UCLA QB Hundley has more overall experience than Stanford QB Hogan...with only three starts. But Hundley better not take seven sacks like he did last week vs. Stanford!  If he does, game over 1st half!

And 8 plus point head-start vs. Stanford no free gift!  Stanford has the power to run up another 24 points in the 4th quarter, bury the 8 point spread, and walk off the field like nothing happened!

Any attack on Stanford is like going up against a shotgun with nothing more than a BB gun!  But will go easy with UCLA and try to build up bankroll to take into the superstar matchups tomorrow.

UCLA plus 10.5 (will buy two extra points) vs. Stanford!

BOL to ALL                  

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 551
Posted: #55
Taking Stanford.  They just beat up on them last week so why expect a much different result 6 days later?  UCLA won't be the ONLY team changing up their plays.  Stanford wants to go to the Rose Bowl and has more talent on both offense and defense to make it happen.

STANFORD!  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3689
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by JinnRikki:

You have a big problem with that argument, Stanford beat Oregon, at home no less. So tell me again why UCLA would rather play Stanford because I don't get it.
If as you say UCLA "laid down" they deserve to be curb stomped this week.


Really?

So between playing Stanford or Oregon in Eugune- you'd pick Stanford?

I suppose you'd also pick playing at A&M vs. @Bama because A&M beat Bama?

C'mon...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 5
Posted: #57
sooo...who to pick? and o/u i follow some1
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 109
Posted: #58
simon_says:

UCLA +8 small play
OVER 44.5 large play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 5
Posted: #59
S and O?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4260
Posted: #60
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #61
got 3-team parlay

OKC nba -9.5
SYRACUSE ncaab -7
UCLA +9

 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 353
Posted: #62
Tip my hat to Jim Mora Jr. and the Bruins, they proved me wrong this time....
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.