All I know from all of this is simple:
I want PaddyMacR to post non-stop.
All I know from all of this is simple:
I want PaddyMacR to post non-stop.
All I know from all of this is simple:
I want PaddyMacR to post non-stop.
Please stay and post at covers. Yes, it is a square site made up of lots of folks who bet at crazy ass books, and lots of folks who will argue simple mathematics, and lots of folks who when presented with facts or fixes - will choose fixes.
We could use some more on the sanity side of the scale.
All I know from all of this is simple:
I want PaddyMacR to post non-stop.
Please stay and post at covers. Yes, it is a square site made up of lots of folks who bet at crazy ass books, and lots of folks who will argue simple mathematics, and lots of folks who when presented with facts or fixes - will choose fixes.
We could use some more on the sanity side of the scale.
That situation was totally unacceptable and the "jenny Woo" wanna be kept alleging the player had been offered payment options that he didn't take. Only thing she didn't tell you was it was gonna cost him $750 to get a 4 figure withdrawal. In her book that would fall into the "we have never missed a payment in 16 years" category. She is peter principle at its best.
That situation was totally unacceptable and the "jenny Woo" wanna be kept alleging the player had been offered payment options that he didn't take. Only thing she didn't tell you was it was gonna cost him $750 to get a 4 figure withdrawal. In her book that would fall into the "we have never missed a payment in 16 years" category. She is peter principle at its best.
That situation was totally unacceptable and the "jenny Woo" wanna be kept alleging the player had been offered payment options that he didn't take. Only thing she didn't tell you was it was gonna cost him $750 to get a 4 figure withdrawal. In her book that would fall into the "we have never missed a payment in 16 years" category. She is peter principle at its best.
That situation was totally unacceptable and the "jenny Woo" wanna be kept alleging the player had been offered payment options that he didn't take. Only thing she didn't tell you was it was gonna cost him $750 to get a 4 figure withdrawal. In her book that would fall into the "we have never missed a payment in 16 years" category. She is peter principle at its best.
Freedom,
I think two things matter in all of this. Firstly, this is a gambling forum, not a courtroom. There isn't going to be "proof" of whether you or Calvin or Billy Bob Thornton were phantom owners of BetEd.All we can do is accept that from the beginning, we had stories on Ayre's website that indicated that a once moderately important figure in online gaming had openly become an informant for the DOJ, and a false informant at that. It was you he was falsely informing on, using a website as an alternative to putting a dime in a payphone.
So the two things are: who owns BetEd, and who's an informant. You say I make a compelling argument, and it is just that, an argument, in the context of dispelling a false and vicious rumor to the folks on this forum, which is a very different place than the forum I usually post on. It's not an argument for a jury, it's an argument to warn people that a man with a long and disgraceful history of deceit is trying to con them. It's says, "Here's your other possibility".
There is a countervailing point to my theory, but it is not that Calvin can't keep a secret, the theory behind your belief that he doesn't own BetEd. Calvin has many secrets, and I know some of the worst ones. He knows I know. You miscalculate in your theory because you don't recognize that Calvin the illegal gaming operator disappeared a couple of years ago, to be replaced by Calvin the brand name owner and franchisor. He can't escape his Bodog crimes, although he tries to do that through this ridiculous "it ain't me, its da Mohawks" story, but the last thing he is going to do is admit to owning another site, let alone brag about it. So that secret he could keep.
The thing I actually find goes against my theory is that, despite being humiliated by getting the boot from Covers,he would then feed it substantial revenue from BetEd. I find it hard, but not impossible, to believe such a vengeful self centered prick would do that. But, no doubt it makes business sense, and why miss the chance to have BetEd rise in prominence if advertising with his humiliators could do that?
As for below the belt, I have no idea what you are talking about. Seriously. The man is trying to grass you out to the US government and hang the 3x bonus fraud on you at the same time. Against such a creep, what would be below the belt?
Freedom,
I think two things matter in all of this. Firstly, this is a gambling forum, not a courtroom. There isn't going to be "proof" of whether you or Calvin or Billy Bob Thornton were phantom owners of BetEd.All we can do is accept that from the beginning, we had stories on Ayre's website that indicated that a once moderately important figure in online gaming had openly become an informant for the DOJ, and a false informant at that. It was you he was falsely informing on, using a website as an alternative to putting a dime in a payphone.
So the two things are: who owns BetEd, and who's an informant. You say I make a compelling argument, and it is just that, an argument, in the context of dispelling a false and vicious rumor to the folks on this forum, which is a very different place than the forum I usually post on. It's not an argument for a jury, it's an argument to warn people that a man with a long and disgraceful history of deceit is trying to con them. It's says, "Here's your other possibility".
There is a countervailing point to my theory, but it is not that Calvin can't keep a secret, the theory behind your belief that he doesn't own BetEd. Calvin has many secrets, and I know some of the worst ones. He knows I know. You miscalculate in your theory because you don't recognize that Calvin the illegal gaming operator disappeared a couple of years ago, to be replaced by Calvin the brand name owner and franchisor. He can't escape his Bodog crimes, although he tries to do that through this ridiculous "it ain't me, its da Mohawks" story, but the last thing he is going to do is admit to owning another site, let alone brag about it. So that secret he could keep.
The thing I actually find goes against my theory is that, despite being humiliated by getting the boot from Covers,he would then feed it substantial revenue from BetEd. I find it hard, but not impossible, to believe such a vengeful self centered prick would do that. But, no doubt it makes business sense, and why miss the chance to have BetEd rise in prominence if advertising with his humiliators could do that?
As for below the belt, I have no idea what you are talking about. Seriously. The man is trying to grass you out to the US government and hang the 3x bonus fraud on you at the same time. Against such a creep, what would be below the belt?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.