I never understand why they do this garbage on interstate highways. I think it really is more about harassing innocent people rather than the safety bullshit that they say it is about.
If it really was about safety and getting drunks off the street they would set up their check points at the parking exit of popular bars and drinking establishments.
For me, it's all about getting a free chance to go through any random person's stuff because they are too ignorant and don't know their rights. How many arrests do you think they make because people don't know their rights? A LOT. And results mean more funding, etc., etc., etc. Not that far from ticket quotas. IMO.
0
Quote Originally Posted by manitoba45:
I never understand why they do this garbage on interstate highways. I think it really is more about harassing innocent people rather than the safety bullshit that they say it is about.
If it really was about safety and getting drunks off the street they would set up their check points at the parking exit of popular bars and drinking establishments.
For me, it's all about getting a free chance to go through any random person's stuff because they are too ignorant and don't know their rights. How many arrests do you think they make because people don't know their rights? A LOT. And results mean more funding, etc., etc., etc. Not that far from ticket quotas. IMO.
And here is an example of two punks flaunting their right to open carry when they could easily concealed carry and no one would know. Probably both got little chubbies walking outside with their gun on the hip for the first time. Irresponsible idiots.
It's people like this who just add to the cynical nature of cops and make it even worse for everyone else.
FYI, the cop lied....he doesn't need a name for the police report.
The lesson is a good one, though.
0
And here is an example of two punks flaunting their right to open carry when they could easily concealed carry and no one would know. Probably both got little chubbies walking outside with their gun on the hip for the first time. Irresponsible idiots.
This is a great piece on this. Basically, the kid was generally right (the cop even admitted that "he knew his rights" at the end). But that comment about his window being "OK" where it was is what pissed off the officer, heightened his suspicion, and turned it into the fiasco it was. That along with the, "am I being detained?" comment got the officer going. If he had rolled down his window and just answered the questions and indicated he did not want to surrender his rights not to be searched and just left it at that, the officer probably wouldn't have gotten his dik in a curl.
Officers can use just about anything they want to prove probable cause in something like this (to get you to pull over on the side of the road). You don't have to give up your rights, but you better know how to communicate them accurately to the officer or they will show you who is boss.
Sorry but individuals have the right to remain silent. The kid doesn't have to answer any questions. First and foremost, if you are ever in a situation like this you say nothing....whether you've been drinking or not. If you do say anything it should be I want my lawyer.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
This is a great piece on this. Basically, the kid was generally right (the cop even admitted that "he knew his rights" at the end). But that comment about his window being "OK" where it was is what pissed off the officer, heightened his suspicion, and turned it into the fiasco it was. That along with the, "am I being detained?" comment got the officer going. If he had rolled down his window and just answered the questions and indicated he did not want to surrender his rights not to be searched and just left it at that, the officer probably wouldn't have gotten his dik in a curl.
Officers can use just about anything they want to prove probable cause in something like this (to get you to pull over on the side of the road). You don't have to give up your rights, but you better know how to communicate them accurately to the officer or they will show you who is boss.
Sorry but individuals have the right to remain silent. The kid doesn't have to answer any questions. First and foremost, if you are ever in a situation like this you say nothing....whether you've been drinking or not. If you do say anything it should be I want my lawyer.
DUI check points are bullshït and they're unconstitutional. What's gonna stop them from making checkpoints to make sure nobody is driving without a license? Or without insurance? Or... what's to stop them from making checkpoints to make sure you don't have drugs on you?
We should be able to drive in a free country without being randomly stopped by law enforcement. And if anyone on this site thinks that DUI checkpoints deter drinking and driving you're sadly mistaken. People just avoid them. I could be wrong but I believe they have to announce where they're going to be anyways. And even if they don't, the point is mute. They should never be able to randomly stop people that are just trying to get from point A to point B. It's total bullshît.
0
DUI check points are bullshït and they're unconstitutional. What's gonna stop them from making checkpoints to make sure nobody is driving without a license? Or without insurance? Or... what's to stop them from making checkpoints to make sure you don't have drugs on you?
We should be able to drive in a free country without being randomly stopped by law enforcement. And if anyone on this site thinks that DUI checkpoints deter drinking and driving you're sadly mistaken. People just avoid them. I could be wrong but I believe they have to announce where they're going to be anyways. And even if they don't, the point is mute. They should never be able to randomly stop people that are just trying to get from point A to point B. It's total bullshît.
I still say we need law free zones where Free Americans can do whatever they want without all those mean and nasty popo picking on them...
Where you can smoke whatever you want, snort whatever you want, drink whatever you want. And do anything to anybody without that despicable personal responsibility for your actions being in the way.
Personal Responsibility for ones actions is such a pain in the @ss... AND STUPID...
0
I still say we need law free zones where Free Americans can do whatever they want without all those mean and nasty popo picking on them...
Where you can smoke whatever you want, snort whatever you want, drink whatever you want. And do anything to anybody without that despicable personal responsibility for your actions being in the way.
Personal Responsibility for ones actions is such a pain in the @ss... AND STUPID...
Sorry but individuals have the right to remain silent. The kid doesn't have to answer any questions. First and foremost, if you are ever in a situation like this you say nothing....whether you've been drinking or not. If you do say anything it should be I want my lawyer.
You're right, he doesn't have to answer any questions. But he does have to communicate with the officer in regards to his position. Not opening his window just gives the officer more ammunition to make life difficult for the person.
I'm not sure what is wrong with opening your window all the way in order to communicate with the officer that you are not interested in answering any questions.
It's just like carrying a firearm in the open. Is it legal? In a lot of places yes. Is it a great idea? Probably not.
You can invoke your right to not answer any questions with a fully open window. Why do people feel the need to bait a cop?
0
Quote Originally Posted by chilitokid:
Sorry but individuals have the right to remain silent. The kid doesn't have to answer any questions. First and foremost, if you are ever in a situation like this you say nothing....whether you've been drinking or not. If you do say anything it should be I want my lawyer.
You're right, he doesn't have to answer any questions. But he does have to communicate with the officer in regards to his position. Not opening his window just gives the officer more ammunition to make life difficult for the person.
I'm not sure what is wrong with opening your window all the way in order to communicate with the officer that you are not interested in answering any questions.
It's just like carrying a firearm in the open. Is it legal? In a lot of places yes. Is it a great idea? Probably not.
You can invoke your right to not answer any questions with a fully open window. Why do people feel the need to bait a cop?
Police officers are very underpaid for the service they perform. Being an officer requires the ability to deal with unknown situations and needing to use common sense and people skills. But lets face it.... the world is not full of the people needed to be officers.
Police officers have a lot of power...they can be judge-jury and executioner at times. Because of this a lot of people become officers to have power and authority of others. And that is what leads to episodes like that filmed.
I know quite a few officers and can tell you that some are fair and just.... and some are pricks that are arrogant. Kind of like Covers
I think the issues with law enforcement are documented... but what is the solution? Most agencies don't have the man power now.... the only way to improve the officers is to increase the wages to get more educated and talented people into the field....but ask yourself this. Would you rather make $80,000 as a lawyer or officer? Most smart people don't want to risk their lives each time they pull someone over
0
Police officers are very underpaid for the service they perform. Being an officer requires the ability to deal with unknown situations and needing to use common sense and people skills. But lets face it.... the world is not full of the people needed to be officers.
Police officers have a lot of power...they can be judge-jury and executioner at times. Because of this a lot of people become officers to have power and authority of others. And that is what leads to episodes like that filmed.
I know quite a few officers and can tell you that some are fair and just.... and some are pricks that are arrogant. Kind of like Covers
I think the issues with law enforcement are documented... but what is the solution? Most agencies don't have the man power now.... the only way to improve the officers is to increase the wages to get more educated and talented people into the field....but ask yourself this. Would you rather make $80,000 as a lawyer or officer? Most smart people don't want to risk their lives each time they pull someone over
Police officers are very underpaid for the service they perform. Being an officer requires the ability to deal with unknown situations and needing to use common sense and people skills. But lets face it.... the world is not full of the people needed to be officers.
Police officers have a lot of power...they can be judge-jury and executioner at times. Because of this a lot of people become officers to have power and authority of others. And that is what leads to episodes like that filmed.
I know quite a few officers and can tell you that some are fair and just.... and some are pricks that are arrogant. Kind of like Covers
I think the issues with law enforcement are documented... but what is the solution? Most agencies don't have the man power now.... the only way to improve the officers is to increase the wages to get more educated and talented people into the field....but ask yourself this. Would you rather make $80,000 as a lawyer or officer? Most smart people don't want to risk their lives each time they pull someone over
Most officers could never make it through 7 years of college.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sparty444:
Police officers are very underpaid for the service they perform. Being an officer requires the ability to deal with unknown situations and needing to use common sense and people skills. But lets face it.... the world is not full of the people needed to be officers.
Police officers have a lot of power...they can be judge-jury and executioner at times. Because of this a lot of people become officers to have power and authority of others. And that is what leads to episodes like that filmed.
I know quite a few officers and can tell you that some are fair and just.... and some are pricks that are arrogant. Kind of like Covers
I think the issues with law enforcement are documented... but what is the solution? Most agencies don't have the man power now.... the only way to improve the officers is to increase the wages to get more educated and talented people into the field....but ask yourself this. Would you rather make $80,000 as a lawyer or officer? Most smart people don't want to risk their lives each time they pull someone over
Most officers could never make it through 7 years of college.
Now when this kid gets pulled over for some minor traffic violation his chances of getting out of it are ZERO.
For as fast as this spread around the internet, you can bet that it spread throughout his local police force as well. Nothing like putting a bullseye on your back.
And you don't see that as a problem?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
Now when this kid gets pulled over for some minor traffic violation his chances of getting out of it are ZERO.
For as fast as this spread around the internet, you can bet that it spread throughout his local police force as well. Nothing like putting a bullseye on your back.
The abuse of freedom is what is leading to the deterioration of our current freedom. People have been trying to get away with bullshit for waaay too long and then cry about their "Liberties" when it is more an issue of common sense and etiquette.
Common sense and etiquette? Common sense and etiquette???
Where is the common sense and etiquette when cops set up illegal road checks and are trained to trick citizens into surrendering their legal rights? Where is the common sense and etiquette when cops are trained to coerce information from citizens?
Please, just STFU again with your asinine comments that permeate this thread about cops "being on your side". The subject of this thread is a video where the cops have their own agenda and are certainly NOT on the side of citizens being illegally detained at a road check.
End of discussion for me. I have more important matters than to argue with a Nazi Police Activist.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
The abuse of freedom is what is leading to the deterioration of our current freedom. People have been trying to get away with bullshit for waaay too long and then cry about their "Liberties" when it is more an issue of common sense and etiquette.
Common sense and etiquette? Common sense and etiquette???
Where is the common sense and etiquette when cops set up illegal road checks and are trained to trick citizens into surrendering their legal rights? Where is the common sense and etiquette when cops are trained to coerce information from citizens?
Please, just STFU again with your asinine comments that permeate this thread about cops "being on your side". The subject of this thread is a video where the cops have their own agenda and are certainly NOT on the side of citizens being illegally detained at a road check.
End of discussion for me. I have more important matters than to argue with a Nazi Police Activist.
It's a simple concept of BS. These DUI checkpoints I'm sure are funded by tax money...more often than not, people get busted for stupid garbage...not DUI's
0
It's a simple concept of BS. These DUI checkpoints I'm sure are funded by tax money...more often than not, people get busted for stupid garbage...not DUI's
Goose, I've met so many people similar to you. The cop haters. "Fuckin' Pigs" they would say when a cop would drive past without knowing that maybe that cop may have saved someone's life the night before or not. Funny thing is, whenever they were the victim of a crime, they were crying to the police faster than you could say Jack Robinson.
I guess we're just on different ends of the spectrum when it comes to the police force. I am one to respect what the police do(or try to do) and you just flat out hate them and feel their services are unnecessary. I am not going to say that your thoughts are asinine as you are entitled to your opinion.
I am a bit confused as to what you mean by these "illegal" road check though. Why exactly are they illegal? It's not exactly everyone's constitutional right to drive a vehicle.
it is your right to not answer questions if there is not reasonable suspicion that you have committed a crime. The road checks per se are not illegal....but they have to allow you to exercise your rights if you choose to.
Honestly, Slovak, it is akin to an officer showing up at your home on a whim and asking you a lot of questions....and going through everything you own if they do not like the answers.
The old, "if you are not doing anything wrong, then what is the big deal," does not work for me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
Goose, I've met so many people similar to you. The cop haters. "Fuckin' Pigs" they would say when a cop would drive past without knowing that maybe that cop may have saved someone's life the night before or not. Funny thing is, whenever they were the victim of a crime, they were crying to the police faster than you could say Jack Robinson.
I guess we're just on different ends of the spectrum when it comes to the police force. I am one to respect what the police do(or try to do) and you just flat out hate them and feel their services are unnecessary. I am not going to say that your thoughts are asinine as you are entitled to your opinion.
I am a bit confused as to what you mean by these "illegal" road check though. Why exactly are they illegal? It's not exactly everyone's constitutional right to drive a vehicle.
it is your right to not answer questions if there is not reasonable suspicion that you have committed a crime. The road checks per se are not illegal....but they have to allow you to exercise your rights if you choose to.
Honestly, Slovak, it is akin to an officer showing up at your home on a whim and asking you a lot of questions....and going through everything you own if they do not like the answers.
The old, "if you are not doing anything wrong, then what is the big deal," does not work for me.
There were plenty of time that I was going to go out on weekends and meet up with friends for some late night drinking and after learning that random check points would be stationed, I declined and stayed home instead. I am most certain that I wasn't the only one.
So that tells me it's either one of two things that stopped you from you from enjoying your right to go out and have fun.
A.) you planned on driving home drunk which I doubt given your given you stance on personal responsibility.
Or
B.) You were scared of what the cops could have done to you once they smelled the one or two beers you had consumed. You knew you weren't going to be over the limit, but still have the idealism that the cops could have f*cked you somehow. You shouldn't have to be scared into having to stay inside and that's where the problem lies. We do have the right to move freely without unreasonable search or questioning.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
There were plenty of time that I was going to go out on weekends and meet up with friends for some late night drinking and after learning that random check points would be stationed, I declined and stayed home instead. I am most certain that I wasn't the only one.
So that tells me it's either one of two things that stopped you from you from enjoying your right to go out and have fun.
A.) you planned on driving home drunk which I doubt given your given you stance on personal responsibility.
Or
B.) You were scared of what the cops could have done to you once they smelled the one or two beers you had consumed. You knew you weren't going to be over the limit, but still have the idealism that the cops could have f*cked you somehow. You shouldn't have to be scared into having to stay inside and that's where the problem lies. We do have the right to move freely without unreasonable search or questioning.
Not really Hutch. When you are driving on the public streets, you are on the State/Government's property, that is why they claim that driving is a "Privilege" because you are privileged to be using their streets and highways.
When you are at your home, you are on your property. Huge difference.
If someone loses control on the road because of poorly constructed or maintained road conditions(too much gravel, pot holes, etc) they sue the state.
If someone trips and fall on the sidewalk in front of your house because the sidewalk has lifted because of tree roots, they sue YOU. Even though you don't "own" the sidewalk, as a home owner, you are responsible for it, even though the public has every right to use it whenever they want.
And how did the government pay for those roads? With TAXPAYER money.
Driving may be a privilege, but the constitution says you don't have to answer random questions if there isn't reasonable suspicion you committed a crime. Now if they set up these checkpoints and people chose to answer their questions, then that's on them. They are ill-informed.
But flat lying to people when they attempt to exercise their rights is flat out B.S. When someone says, "I do not want to answer any questions if you don't have reasonable suspicion that I committed a crime," the cop should say, "OK, you can be on your way." None of this, "pull up there and pull over," or "you have to answer my questions," or asking the same question 10 times when the person has already stated they don't want to answer.
That's intimidation and it's complete B.S.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
Not really Hutch. When you are driving on the public streets, you are on the State/Government's property, that is why they claim that driving is a "Privilege" because you are privileged to be using their streets and highways.
When you are at your home, you are on your property. Huge difference.
If someone loses control on the road because of poorly constructed or maintained road conditions(too much gravel, pot holes, etc) they sue the state.
If someone trips and fall on the sidewalk in front of your house because the sidewalk has lifted because of tree roots, they sue YOU. Even though you don't "own" the sidewalk, as a home owner, you are responsible for it, even though the public has every right to use it whenever they want.
And how did the government pay for those roads? With TAXPAYER money.
Driving may be a privilege, but the constitution says you don't have to answer random questions if there isn't reasonable suspicion you committed a crime. Now if they set up these checkpoints and people chose to answer their questions, then that's on them. They are ill-informed.
But flat lying to people when they attempt to exercise their rights is flat out B.S. When someone says, "I do not want to answer any questions if you don't have reasonable suspicion that I committed a crime," the cop should say, "OK, you can be on your way." None of this, "pull up there and pull over," or "you have to answer my questions," or asking the same question 10 times when the person has already stated they don't want to answer.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Cops are just nice guys looking to give breaks to everyone.
Hot Forum Topics
