Have you proven
To this day, not a single piece of wreckage was ever recovered from Flight 93. No engine, no metal debris, nothing
You devote to Thermite. Are you saying the towers were brought down by thermite. If so how was the thermite deployed, were the steel supports on every floor first exposed and then treated with thermite, how much needed, how did workers enter and leave the towers un noticed over the weeks needed to expose supports on every floor, un noticed by everyone working in the towers. Have you seen evidence that thermite can cut through steel supports. We all know basic thermite in our firework sparklers. Has thermite been used by demolition teams to bring down buildings.
You devote to Thermite. Are you saying the towers were brought down by thermite. If so how was the thermite deployed, were the steel supports on every floor first exposed and then treated with thermite, how much needed, how did workers enter and leave the towers un noticed over the weeks needed to expose supports on every floor, un noticed by everyone working in the towers. Have you seen evidence that thermite can cut through steel supports. We all know basic thermite in our firework sparklers. Has thermite been used by demolition teams to bring down buildings.
I have an idea, how about we our energy for something positive? Maybe spend time w/kids w/o parents or role models. Clean up a neighborhood or open a soup kitchen?
Dwelling on theories that people put out there for their OWN PROFIT is absurd. The negative energy used on this "theory" is a waste.
Do something positive for those lives lost that day. What's done is done.
I have an idea, how about we our energy for something positive? Maybe spend time w/kids w/o parents or role models. Clean up a neighborhood or open a soup kitchen?
Dwelling on theories that people put out there for their OWN PROFIT is absurd. The negative energy used on this "theory" is a waste.
Do something positive for those lives lost that day. What's done is done.
You devote to Thermite. Are you saying the towers were brought down by thermite. If so how was the thermite deployed, were the steel supports on every floor first exposed and then treated with thermite, how much needed, how did workers enter and leave the towers un noticed over the weeks needed to expose supports on every floor, un noticed by everyone working in the towers. Have you seen evidence that thermite can cut through steel supports. We all know basic thermite in our firework sparklers. Has thermite been used by demolition teams to bring down buildings.
You devote to Thermite. Are you saying the towers were brought down by thermite. If so how was the thermite deployed, were the steel supports on every floor first exposed and then treated with thermite, how much needed, how did workers enter and leave the towers un noticed over the weeks needed to expose supports on every floor, un noticed by everyone working in the towers. Have you seen evidence that thermite can cut through steel supports. We all know basic thermite in our firework sparklers. Has thermite been used by demolition teams to bring down buildings.
NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity". They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".
How can a building made of several thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason. They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.
NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):
"The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."
So essentially: Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite (or Super Thermite). NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.
Hmm. "Security detection". Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we?
Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001.
Coincidentally, Dulles was the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it allegedly hit the Pentagon after allegedly being hijacked en route to San Francisco.
Coincidentally, 3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the alleged hijackings.
Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation? According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms. So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.
Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... right...?
ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months. It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.
We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.
BLU - I think you also asked me if Thermite can actually cut through steel at the rate needed to bring down the 3 WTC buildings. The answer is yes, it can.
Hopefully this helped answer your questions. If not, give me more specific details to which I can focus more fully. This is a subject I'm very educated on and am 100% convinced that my research and findings are correct, supported by scientific evidence and eye witness testimony. I supplied you with plenty of links, so please watch all the video and click the links as you're reading my response. If you don't, you won't get the full view of the point I'm attempting to make.
[/Quote]NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity". They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".
How can a building made of several thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason. They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.
NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):
"The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."
So essentially: Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite (or Super Thermite). NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.
Hmm. "Security detection". Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we?
Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001.
Coincidentally, Dulles was the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it allegedly hit the Pentagon after allegedly being hijacked en route to San Francisco.
Coincidentally, 3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the alleged hijackings.
Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation? According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms. So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.
Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... right...?
ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months. It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.
We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.
BLU - I think you also asked me if Thermite can actually cut through steel at the rate needed to bring down the 3 WTC buildings. The answer is yes, it can.
Hopefully this helped answer your questions. If not, give me more specific details to which I can focus more fully. This is a subject I'm very educated on and am 100% convinced that my research and findings are correct, supported by scientific evidence and eye witness testimony. I supplied you with plenty of links, so please watch all the video and click the links as you're reading my response. If you don't, you won't get the full view of the point I'm attempting to make.
[/Quote]BLU - the following is from page 30 or 31 of this thread, in which I attempted to detail the use of thermite in the WTC collapse, as well as other facts. If it's still not the answer you're looking for, just let me know and I'll attempt again. Here we go:
NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity". They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".
Now I ask, how can a building made of several thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason. They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.
NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):
"The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."
So essentially: Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite (or Super-Thermite). NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.
Hmm. "Security detection". Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we?
Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001.
Coincidentally, Dulles was the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it allegedly hit the Pentagon after allegedly being hijacked en route to San Francisco.
Coincidentally again, 3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the hijackings.
Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation? According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms. So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.
Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... Right...?!?
ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months. It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.
We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.
Now I ask again, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
BLU - the following is from page 30 or 31 of this thread, in which I attempted to detail the use of thermite in the WTC collapse, as well as other facts. If it's still not the answer you're looking for, just let me know and I'll attempt again. Here we go:
NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity". They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".
Now I ask, how can a building made of several thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason. They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.
NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):
"The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."
So essentially: Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite (or Super-Thermite). NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.
Hmm. "Security detection". Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we?
Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001.
Coincidentally, Dulles was the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it allegedly hit the Pentagon after allegedly being hijacked en route to San Francisco.
Coincidentally again, 3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the hijackings.
Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation? According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms. So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.
Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... Right...?!?
ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months. It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.
We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.
Now I ask again, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
I have an idea, how about we our energy for something positive? Maybe spend time w/kids w/o parents or role models. Clean up a neighborhood or open a soup kitchen?
Dwelling on theories that people put out there for their OWN PROFIT is absurd. The negative energy used on this "theory" is a waste.
Do something positive for those lives lost that day. What's done is done.
I have an idea, how about we our energy for something positive? Maybe spend time w/kids w/o parents or role models. Clean up a neighborhood or open a soup kitchen?
Dwelling on theories that people put out there for their OWN PROFIT is absurd. The negative energy used on this "theory" is a waste.
Do something positive for those lives lost that day. What's done is done.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do? Enough said.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do? Enough said.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do? WOW!!!!!!!!!
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do? WOW!!!!!!!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.