smdio even if you had a team of lawyers, it's the Internet its going to look like bullshit, no matter whats true with your personal life lets only deal with what we can show with links about the topic, most of the research about 9/11 has been on the Internet unfortunately credibility is hard enough to find on the topic, so lets not add insult to injury
You're right, I probably should have never mentioned that fact. Although it is true, I shouldn't have expected anyone to believe me, especially over the internet. This subject is tedious as it is, and telling people I've retained representation to fight the government makes it even more unbelievable.
My bad. Wish I could take it back, but it's not really relavent to the fact that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, and I've proved that fact in this thread.
smdio even if you had a team of lawyers, it's the Internet its going to look like bullshit, no matter whats true with your personal life lets only deal with what we can show with links about the topic, most of the research about 9/11 has been on the Internet unfortunately credibility is hard enough to find on the topic, so lets not add insult to injury
You're right, I probably should have never mentioned that fact. Although it is true, I shouldn't have expected anyone to believe me, especially over the internet. This subject is tedious as it is, and telling people I've retained representation to fight the government makes it even more unbelievable.
My bad. Wish I could take it back, but it's not really relavent to the fact that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, and I've proved that fact in this thread.
Also, there is only ONE PERSON on record saying that they say the plane actually hit the Pentagon. When under oath, all of the people that tillyo quoted above would not admitt to seeing the plane strike. Why you ask? Because they didn't see it. The only person to go on record saying that he saw the plane fly INTO the building was Mike Walter. I can get into another 3-4 pages of debate as to why Walter is a lying sack of shit, if you want. I've spent hours picking his story apart, starting with the fact that he ALSO says the plane take a NoC approach, but then goes on to say that he witnessed the light poles being hit (impossible). under oath? Dont they only do that in court? Cant wait til I see your proof (since you posted it ) that these people testified in court. Bet you cant eye witness testimony is only good when it suits you? Looks that way. Will be doing other things while you and YOUR TEAM OF LAWYERS dig that up.
Also, there is only ONE PERSON on record saying that they say the plane actually hit the Pentagon. When under oath, all of the people that tillyo quoted above would not admitt to seeing the plane strike. Why you ask? Because they didn't see it. The only person to go on record saying that he saw the plane fly INTO the building was Mike Walter. I can get into another 3-4 pages of debate as to why Walter is a lying sack of shit, if you want. I've spent hours picking his story apart, starting with the fact that he ALSO says the plane take a NoC approach, but then goes on to say that he witnessed the light poles being hit (impossible). under oath? Dont they only do that in court? Cant wait til I see your proof (since you posted it ) that these people testified in court. Bet you cant eye witness testimony is only good when it suits you? Looks that way. Will be doing other things while you and YOUR TEAM OF LAWYERS dig that up.
you guys have all the answers here are some legitimate questions
was the plane hi-jacked?
if yes - then where did it go ? and why didnt it hit the pentagon or some other target - if it was hijacked and didnt hit the pentagon it must have been shot down - where did it crash?
if no - then it was flown over the pentagon to look like it was going to crash - then what was the next step? the pilot would have to be in on the conspiracy - why would he agree to do this? someone said the plane was made to disappear - how is this possible?
you all have said you won't speculate on these questions - yet you speculate on every other thing that happened
so easy question - was flight 77 hi-jacked?
you guys have all the answers here are some legitimate questions
was the plane hi-jacked?
if yes - then where did it go ? and why didnt it hit the pentagon or some other target - if it was hijacked and didnt hit the pentagon it must have been shot down - where did it crash?
if no - then it was flown over the pentagon to look like it was going to crash - then what was the next step? the pilot would have to be in on the conspiracy - why would he agree to do this? someone said the plane was made to disappear - how is this possible?
you all have said you won't speculate on these questions - yet you speculate on every other thing that happened
so easy question - was flight 77 hi-jacked?
Also, there is only ONE PERSON on record saying that they say the plane actually hit the Pentagon. When under oath, all of the people that tillyo quoted above would not admitt to seeing the plane strike. Why you ask? Because they didn't see it. The only person to go on record saying that he saw the plane fly INTO the building was Mike Walter. I can get into another 3-4 pages of debate as to why Walter is a lying sack of shit, if you want. I've spent hours picking his story apart, starting with the fact that he ALSO says the plane take a NoC approach, but then goes on to say that he witnessed the light poles being hit (impossible). under oath? Dont they only do that in court? Cant wait til I see your proof (since you posted it ) that these people testified in court. Bet you cant eye witness testimony is only good when it suits you? Looks that way. Will be doing other things while you and YOUR TEAM OF LAWYERS dig that up.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do?
Also, there is only ONE PERSON on record saying that they say the plane actually hit the Pentagon. When under oath, all of the people that tillyo quoted above would not admitt to seeing the plane strike. Why you ask? Because they didn't see it. The only person to go on record saying that he saw the plane fly INTO the building was Mike Walter. I can get into another 3-4 pages of debate as to why Walter is a lying sack of shit, if you want. I've spent hours picking his story apart, starting with the fact that he ALSO says the plane take a NoC approach, but then goes on to say that he witnessed the light poles being hit (impossible). under oath? Dont they only do that in court? Cant wait til I see your proof (since you posted it ) that these people testified in court. Bet you cant eye witness testimony is only good when it suits you? Looks that way. Will be doing other things while you and YOUR TEAM OF LAWYERS dig that up.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do?
you guys have all the answers here are some legitimate questions
was the plane hi-jacked?
if yes - then where did it go ? and why didnt it hit the pentagon or some other target - if it was hijacked and didnt hit the pentagon it must have been shot down - where did it crash?
if no - then it was flown over the pentagon to look like it was going to crash - then what was the next step? the pilot would have to be in on the conspiracy - why would he agree to do this? someone said the plane was made to disappear - how is this possible?
you all have said you won't speculate on these questions - yet you speculate on every other thing that happened
so easy question - was flight 77 hi-jacked?
What happened to the plane? Was the pilot in on it? Where are the passengers?
I cannot answer those questions, as I've stated before. It is safe to assume that the pilot, passengers, and crew are all safe somewhere. Keep in mind that 34 out of the 66 passengers supposedly on Flight 77 worked for the Government. 12 were AA crew, and the others were supposedly civilians. You are not talking about hundreds of people disappearing, just 66, and more than half of them were employed by the Government.
I believe that the plane which dozens of witnesses saw take a NoC approach to the Pentagon landed at the nearby Reagon Int'l airport. I believe this plane was indeed Flight 77. I also believe that something other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. There have been very good cases made for both a cruise missile, and also a drone Global Hawk aircraft which fired a cruise missile before it intentionally crashed itself.
What I do know is this: Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. I have proved that in this thread. I have a feeling that if more of you watched this video, you would be in agreement with me about how the NoC approach made it physically impossible for Flight 77 to hit the Pentagon and cause the very specific damage to both the building, and the downed light poles.
you guys have all the answers here are some legitimate questions
was the plane hi-jacked?
if yes - then where did it go ? and why didnt it hit the pentagon or some other target - if it was hijacked and didnt hit the pentagon it must have been shot down - where did it crash?
if no - then it was flown over the pentagon to look like it was going to crash - then what was the next step? the pilot would have to be in on the conspiracy - why would he agree to do this? someone said the plane was made to disappear - how is this possible?
you all have said you won't speculate on these questions - yet you speculate on every other thing that happened
so easy question - was flight 77 hi-jacked?
What happened to the plane? Was the pilot in on it? Where are the passengers?
I cannot answer those questions, as I've stated before. It is safe to assume that the pilot, passengers, and crew are all safe somewhere. Keep in mind that 34 out of the 66 passengers supposedly on Flight 77 worked for the Government. 12 were AA crew, and the others were supposedly civilians. You are not talking about hundreds of people disappearing, just 66, and more than half of them were employed by the Government.
I believe that the plane which dozens of witnesses saw take a NoC approach to the Pentagon landed at the nearby Reagon Int'l airport. I believe this plane was indeed Flight 77. I also believe that something other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. There have been very good cases made for both a cruise missile, and also a drone Global Hawk aircraft which fired a cruise missile before it intentionally crashed itself.
What I do know is this: Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. I have proved that in this thread. I have a feeling that if more of you watched this video, you would be in agreement with me about how the NoC approach made it physically impossible for Flight 77 to hit the Pentagon and cause the very specific damage to both the building, and the downed light poles.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! ARE YOU A READING THIS REILLY HUTCH KAMPO THEY TESTIFIES BEFORE THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS i AM LAUGHING SO HARD I CANT BREATHE THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS IS A LIBRARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ENOUGH SAID YOU COULD OF NOT SAID ANYTHING DUMBER THATS PERFECT SMIDDYO THEY TESTIFIED BEFOR A LIBRARY DID YOU GRADUATE THE 10TH GRADE? NO NEED TO ANSWER YOU POST ARE YOUR PORTRAIT YOU WILL NEVER RECOVER FROM THIS. LEAVE PLEASE PEOPLE CHIME IN YOU MAY NEVER GET THIS CHANCE AGAIN.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! ARE YOU A READING THIS REILLY HUTCH KAMPO THEY TESTIFIES BEFORE THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS i AM LAUGHING SO HARD I CANT BREATHE THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS IS A LIBRARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ENOUGH SAID YOU COULD OF NOT SAID ANYTHING DUMBER THATS PERFECT SMIDDYO THEY TESTIFIED BEFOR A LIBRARY DID YOU GRADUATE THE 10TH GRADE? NO NEED TO ANSWER YOU POST ARE YOUR PORTRAIT YOU WILL NEVER RECOVER FROM THIS. LEAVE PLEASE PEOPLE CHIME IN YOU MAY NEVER GET THIS CHANCE AGAIN.
YOU POST ARE YOUR PORTRAIT
ARE YOU A READING THIS
THEY TESTIFIES
BEFOR A LIBRARY
DID YOU GRADUATE THE 10TH GRADE?
Hey Tillyo....That noise you hear in your head is your last 2 brain cells trying to escape because of lonliness.
But your government needs more like you.
YOU POST ARE YOUR PORTRAIT
ARE YOU A READING THIS
THEY TESTIFIES
BEFOR A LIBRARY
DID YOU GRADUATE THE 10TH GRADE?
Hey Tillyo....That noise you hear in your head is your last 2 brain cells trying to escape because of lonliness.
But your government needs more like you.
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do?
Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001. This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in
Is that the best you can do?
Smdio # 1088
Donald Rumsfeld is on record referring to Flight 93 being "shot down
please note Sarah Palin is on record saying "But obviously, we've got to stand with our North Korean allies. We're bound to by treaty,
Smdio # 1088
Donald Rumsfeld is on record referring to Flight 93 being "shot down
please note Sarah Palin is on record saying "But obviously, we've got to stand with our North Korean allies. We're bound to by treaty,
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.