I was getting shît cards all day long and lost $315. What a shîtty day. I don't care who hits what. The next blackjack I get I can thank the dumbshît that doubled on a soft 14 against a dealer 10. Yes... he did it. He was sitting right beside me. He was a fifty year old harry fat man wearing a sleeveless Cavs Lebron jersey. Classic.
So many stupid blackjack players
I was getting shît cards all day long and lost $315. What a shîtty day. I don't care who hits what. The next blackjack I get I can thank the dumbshît that doubled on a soft 14 against a dealer 10. Yes... he did it. He was sitting right beside me. He was a fifty year old harry fat man wearing a sleeveless Cavs Lebron jersey. Classic.
I was getting shît cards all day long and lost $315. What a shîtty day. I don't care who hits what. The next blackjack I get I can thank the dumbshît that doubled on a soft 14 against a dealer 10. Yes... he did it. He was sitting right beside me. He was a fifty year old harry fat man wearing a sleeveless Cavs Lebron jersey. Classic.
Get off the 10 dollar table and step up if you want to lose the numb nuts very few on the 50/100 or high stakes tables.
I agree on the less idiots at the higher stakes tables comments. But I disagree on the it makes a difference on how you play.
If you mean that your own play makes a difference in your own outcome then you are correct.
If you mean that the play of others effects your results than I disagree. Of course a ill advised hit by a player at the table can make you lose some hands but people always fail to mention the times that those ill advised hits happen to take a good card away from the dealer making the dealer then bust. IMO the ill advised plays are basically a wash in terms of helping / hurting.
Get off the 10 dollar table and step up if you want to lose the numb nuts very few on the 50/100 or high stakes tables.
I agree on the less idiots at the higher stakes tables comments. But I disagree on the it makes a difference on how you play.
If you mean that your own play makes a difference in your own outcome then you are correct.
If you mean that the play of others effects your results than I disagree. Of course a ill advised hit by a player at the table can make you lose some hands but people always fail to mention the times that those ill advised hits happen to take a good card away from the dealer making the dealer then bust. IMO the ill advised plays are basically a wash in terms of helping / hurting.
Statistically speaking, it makes no difference how others play their cards. Zero. We've had this discussion before many times here on covers. As Matt said above, bad players are a wash in terms of helping / hurting.
I personally don't like bad players at my table. It makes me uncomfortable. Any time I am uneasy, whether it be because of bad players, a dealer I don't like, smoke in my eyes, an ugly waitress, whatever, I get up and move. I want the playing conditions to be perfect. It's tough enough winning at this game without all the other unnecessary distractions.
Statistically speaking, it makes no difference how others play their cards. Zero. We've had this discussion before many times here on covers. As Matt said above, bad players are a wash in terms of helping / hurting.
I personally don't like bad players at my table. It makes me uncomfortable. Any time I am uneasy, whether it be because of bad players, a dealer I don't like, smoke in my eyes, an ugly waitress, whatever, I get up and move. I want the playing conditions to be perfect. It's tough enough winning at this game without all the other unnecessary distractions.
Great trip to the casino this morning. Plus $400 first session. Plus $200 second session. Hit'em and run. That breaks the two trip losing streak I had going.
This Asian woman was playing a solid third base but was afraid to double anything. She would get a 6-5 against the dealer's 7, but just took the hit instead of doubling. It never affected the dealer's cards because she always got the card she needed. She did this like four times in a row and I'm just shaking my head. Why are you leaving money on the table?
Great trip to the casino this morning. Plus $400 first session. Plus $200 second session. Hit'em and run. That breaks the two trip losing streak I had going.
This Asian woman was playing a solid third base but was afraid to double anything. She would get a 6-5 against the dealer's 7, but just took the hit instead of doubling. It never affected the dealer's cards because she always got the card she needed. She did this like four times in a row and I'm just shaking my head. Why are you leaving money on the table?
Truth is and this will hurt a little and you will not believe it one bit.
It makes no difference in the Long Run what a player does.
You are absolutely mathematically correct. However, I hate when idiots play INCONSISTENTLY, as their gut plays seem to sink the whole table quicker for some odd reason.
Truth is and this will hurt a little and you will not believe it one bit.
It makes no difference in the Long Run what a player does.
You are absolutely mathematically correct. However, I hate when idiots play INCONSISTENTLY, as their gut plays seem to sink the whole table quicker for some odd reason.
Since I've turned 21 when I would play Bj in Vegas id always always play by myself especially the high limits $50 to $100 a hand.
I rarely play blackjack any more, but I HATE heads up. At least with 2 other people, someone at the table likely has a pat hand, and the dealer has to hit their junk hand.
I just think you get a screwy flow of cards when you play heads up, bust, and the dealer turns over a 15 and moves on to the next hand.
Since I've turned 21 when I would play Bj in Vegas id always always play by myself especially the high limits $50 to $100 a hand.
I rarely play blackjack any more, but I HATE heads up. At least with 2 other people, someone at the table likely has a pat hand, and the dealer has to hit their junk hand.
I just think you get a screwy flow of cards when you play heads up, bust, and the dealer turns over a 15 and moves on to the next hand.
Then there was this other lady that wouldn't stop complaining about the smoke. I don't like it either lady but you're in a casino that allows smoking for God's sake. Leave if you don't like it. Didn't you expect some smoke in a casino that allows it? Don't be a flippin stupid.
I feel little sympathy for non-smoking players at a smoking table. But it must really suck for the dealer to consistently inhale all those pollutants.
Then there was this other lady that wouldn't stop complaining about the smoke. I don't like it either lady but you're in a casino that allows smoking for God's sake. Leave if you don't like it. Didn't you expect some smoke in a casino that allows it? Don't be a flippin stupid.
I feel little sympathy for non-smoking players at a smoking table. But it must really suck for the dealer to consistently inhale all those pollutants.
I feel little sympathy for non-smoking players at a smoking table. But it must really suck for the dealer to consistently inhale all those pollutants.
I feel little sympathy for non-smoking players at a smoking table. But it must really suck for the dealer to consistently inhale all those pollutants.
6 decks
Dealer stands on soft 17
Double on any first two cards allowed
Double after split allowed
Late surrender allowed
Player may re-split to four hands, including aces
Cut card used
First, I had both players follow correct total-dependent basic strategy. Over almost 1.6 billion rounds, the loss of the first player to act was 0.289%, and the second player to act of 0.288%.
Second, I had the first player follow the same correct strategy, and the second player follow the same correct strategy except:
Always hit 12 to 16
Always double 9 to 11
Split any pair
Never surrender
Never soft double
In a simulation of 1.05 billion hands the loss of the first player was 0.282%, and the second player was 11.260%. So the house edge of the basic strategy playing first player was almost the same, regardless of whether the second player played correctly or wildly incorrectly. I hope this puts and end the third baseman myth, but I doubt it. As I have said many times, the more ridiculous a belief is, the more tenaciously it tends to be held.
6 decks
Dealer stands on soft 17
Double on any first two cards allowed
Double after split allowed
Late surrender allowed
Player may re-split to four hands, including aces
Cut card used
First, I had both players follow correct total-dependent basic strategy. Over almost 1.6 billion rounds, the loss of the first player to act was 0.289%, and the second player to act of 0.288%.
Second, I had the first player follow the same correct strategy, and the second player follow the same correct strategy except:
Always hit 12 to 16
Always double 9 to 11
Split any pair
Never surrender
Never soft double
In a simulation of 1.05 billion hands the loss of the first player was 0.282%, and the second player was 11.260%. So the house edge of the basic strategy playing first player was almost the same, regardless of whether the second player played correctly or wildly incorrectly. I hope this puts and end the third baseman myth, but I doubt it. As I have said many times, the more ridiculous a belief is, the more tenaciously it tends to be held.
I rarely play blackjack any more, but I HATE heads up. At least with 2 other people, someone at the table likely has a pat hand, and the dealer has to hit their junk hand.
I just think you get a screwy flow of cards when you play heads up, bust, and the dealer turns over a 15 and moves on to the next hand.
I love playing heads up and playing 3 hands at a time. If you are playing good along with some good instinct (dealer hot/cold), you can stand on a 14 when the dealer is showing a 7 to hit your 12 on the next hand and let your 18 ride on the 3rd. Dealer flips over a 9-5 you are in business......
I rarely play blackjack any more, but I HATE heads up. At least with 2 other people, someone at the table likely has a pat hand, and the dealer has to hit their junk hand.
I just think you get a screwy flow of cards when you play heads up, bust, and the dealer turns over a 15 and moves on to the next hand.
I love playing heads up and playing 3 hands at a time. If you are playing good along with some good instinct (dealer hot/cold), you can stand on a 14 when the dealer is showing a 7 to hit your 12 on the next hand and let your 18 ride on the 3rd. Dealer flips over a 9-5 you are in business......
I need to get that $315 back. I don't have to do that right away or all at once, but I will. Gonna stay away for a bit. Need a much needed break. I'll go in fresh after a few months. That last trip just pissed me off. I'd have a 19, the dealer would have a 4 up, flip a 6, then a 3, then a 7 giving him 20. Shît like that happened every other hand or so it seemed. It was ridiculous. When I left I was furious.
I need to get that $315 back. I don't have to do that right away or all at once, but I will. Gonna stay away for a bit. Need a much needed break. I'll go in fresh after a few months. That last trip just pissed me off. I'd have a 19, the dealer would have a 4 up, flip a 6, then a 3, then a 7 giving him 20. Shît like that happened every other hand or so it seemed. It was ridiculous. When I left I was furious.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,480
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,476
-
Monday 09/21/2026
459
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,168
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,544
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
4,066
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,050
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,550
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,765
-
Take the Giants Moneyline tonight - Really
2,796
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
