Confirmed.
Scroll down on the link
https://www.drf.com/news/kentucky-derby-top-five-contenders-and-other-statistics
Confirmed.
Scroll down on the link
https://www.drf.com/news/kentucky-derby-top-five-contenders-and-other-statistics
Please explain to me how he was "playable." I couldn't / wouldn't bet him in that Derby if I could play it today.
Here are the PPs for you. Draw a line through every race from the Derby up and tell me how.
https://www1.drf.com/tc/kentuckyderby/2009/pps/minethatbird.pdf
The answer "Calvin Borel" is not allowed.
HB
Please explain to me how he was "playable." I couldn't / wouldn't bet him in that Derby if I could play it today.
Here are the PPs for you. Draw a line through every race from the Derby up and tell me how.
https://www1.drf.com/tc/kentuckyderby/2009/pps/minethatbird.pdf
The answer "Calvin Borel" is not allowed.
HB
Please explain to me how he was "playable." I couldn't / wouldn't bet him in that Derby if I could play it today.
Here are the PPs for you. Draw a line through every race from the Derby up and tell me how.
https://www1.drf.com/tc/kentuckyderby/2009/pps/minethatbird.pdf
The answer "Calvin Borel" is not allowed.
HB
Please explain to me how he was "playable." I couldn't / wouldn't bet him in that Derby if I could play it today.
Here are the PPs for you. Draw a line through every race from the Derby up and tell me how.
https://www1.drf.com/tc/kentuckyderby/2009/pps/minethatbird.pdf
The answer "Calvin Borel" is not allowed.
HB
I guess..... I just think it's by far and away the worst form I've seen for a Derby winner ever. I would have had a hard time liking him in a N2X @ Churchill on the undercard that day.
The one thing I will say, is I think he took money. I think his odds could have and should have been about 100-1. I still can't understand how he went only 50-1?
HB
I guess..... I just think it's by far and away the worst form I've seen for a Derby winner ever. I would have had a hard time liking him in a N2X @ Churchill on the undercard that day.
The one thing I will say, is I think he took money. I think his odds could have and should have been about 100-1. I still can't understand how he went only 50-1?
HB
I guess..... I just think it's by far and away the worst form I've seen for a Derby winner ever. I would have had a hard time liking him in a N2X @ Churchill on the undercard that day.
The one thing I will say, is I think he took money. I think his odds could have and should have been about 100-1. I still can't understand how he went only 50-1?
HB
I guess..... I just think it's by far and away the worst form I've seen for a Derby winner ever. I would have had a hard time liking him in a N2X @ Churchill on the undercard that day.
The one thing I will say, is I think he took money. I think his odds could have and should have been about 100-1. I still can't understand how he went only 50-1?
HB
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.