At the end of college football season I ask one non stock related question:as a casual observer of football, how is it that Ohio State, a team that seems like it would finish 4th or 5th in the SEC, is always seemingly playing for the national championship? When are the assclowns of the NCAA ever get a playoff system in that one sport? Sheesh.
Now as to stocks...best long idea from me is MO (I love dividends in this environment, well make that all environments). I think if the Fed cuts rates and creates an ephemeral rally I will use it to sell into, and consolidate.I will also add some more SKF if it declines.
Lastly, anyone got a good ballpark figure for total writedowns of the housing meltdown? I have read as much as one trillion dollars.Anyone think that is excessive?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
At the end of college football season I ask one non stock related question:as a casual observer of football, how is it that Ohio State, a team that seems like it would finish 4th or 5th in the SEC, is always seemingly playing for the national championship? When are the assclowns of the NCAA ever get a playoff system in that one sport? Sheesh.
Now as to stocks...best long idea from me is MO (I love dividends in this environment, well make that all environments). I think if the Fed cuts rates and creates an ephemeral rally I will use it to sell into, and consolidate.I will also add some more SKF if it declines.
Lastly, anyone got a good ballpark figure for total writedowns of the housing meltdown? I have read as much as one trillion dollars.Anyone think that is excessive?
From a newsletter....again not to beat the bear drum, just something to consider if we are in one:
The
S&P 500 Index is a leading indicator par excellence. Since the
1950s, the Index has always peaked before the peak of a business cycle,
with the 1980 business cycle being the only exception. The Index has
established a trough prior to the end of a recession without exception.
(2)
The median percentage decline of the Index from its peak to trough was 16.9%.
By the close of the
market yesterday the S&P 500 Index was down by 9.5% from its peak
in October 2007. Although the expectation of a recession has been
gaining support, it does not represent a consensus view by a long shot
0
From a newsletter....again not to beat the bear drum, just something to consider if we are in one:
The
S&P 500 Index is a leading indicator par excellence. Since the
1950s, the Index has always peaked before the peak of a business cycle,
with the 1980 business cycle being the only exception. The Index has
established a trough prior to the end of a recession without exception.
(2)
The median percentage decline of the Index from its peak to trough was 16.9%.
By the close of the
market yesterday the S&P 500 Index was down by 9.5% from its peak
in October 2007. Although the expectation of a recession has been
gaining support, it does not represent a consensus view by a long shot
Sorry for not replying when you first mentioned it.
HANS would be a stock that I would purchase a medium ammt, not like having it be one stock in my portfolio. They arent hyper growing like they were, but this price represents that fact. At a 30 PE with their growth rates, I would expect you could get 20% return in the stock, but I would also put a 10% stop loss on the trade. So the risk is 10% the upside is 20-30% or more..so the risk/reward is good on the trade.
Their products are great, I dont buy the vitamin water phase (if people start thinking, they will realize that the absorption of vitamins through water, especially synthesized vitamins isnt very good and the phase will pass) but the energy drink category should continue until somthing viable and marketable comes along.
0
Gunners,
Sorry for not replying when you first mentioned it.
HANS would be a stock that I would purchase a medium ammt, not like having it be one stock in my portfolio. They arent hyper growing like they were, but this price represents that fact. At a 30 PE with their growth rates, I would expect you could get 20% return in the stock, but I would also put a 10% stop loss on the trade. So the risk is 10% the upside is 20-30% or more..so the risk/reward is good on the trade.
Their products are great, I dont buy the vitamin water phase (if people start thinking, they will realize that the absorption of vitamins through water, especially synthesized vitamins isnt very good and the phase will pass) but the energy drink category should continue until somthing viable and marketable comes along.
Sorry for not replying when you first mentioned it.
no problem. thanks for the insight. I'm definitely not going to make it my only holding. I received a serious bonus this year and can allocate a lot of money to investing now. and i'm not going to buy any more OTC or penny stocks anymore, so i'm getting into the real game and i'm looking for some nice names.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Gunners,
Sorry for not replying when you first mentioned it.
no problem. thanks for the insight. I'm definitely not going to make it my only holding. I received a serious bonus this year and can allocate a lot of money to investing now. and i'm not going to buy any more OTC or penny stocks anymore, so i'm getting into the real game and i'm looking for some nice names.
-CFC fabricating documents in a bankruptcy hearing -CFC bankruptcy rumor
or most likely
-morgan stanley downgrading MBI, ABK, SCA
if those 3 debt insurers dont have triple AAA ratings then everyone has to pay more to have their debt insured...and if one fails...well, it will be very very bad
0
mkt turnover due to a few things:
-CFC fabricating documents in a bankruptcy hearing -CFC bankruptcy rumor
or most likely
-morgan stanley downgrading MBI, ABK, SCA
if those 3 debt insurers dont have triple AAA ratings then everyone has to pay more to have their debt insured...and if one fails...well, it will be very very bad
Bond insurers are beginning to realize "sizable" losses
on their portfolios of residential mortgage-backed securities,
refunding income has slumped and there's been a sharp slowdown in the
use of municipal bond insurance, Ken Zerbe and colleagues at Morgan
Stanley wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday.
"The headwinds facing
the guarantors appear to be worsening," Zerbe said. "The continued
deterioration in the credit markets is taking a significant toll."
0
see below:
Bond insurers are beginning to realize "sizable" losses
on their portfolios of residential mortgage-backed securities,
refunding income has slumped and there's been a sharp slowdown in the
use of municipal bond insurance, Ken Zerbe and colleagues at Morgan
Stanley wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday.
"The headwinds facing
the guarantors appear to be worsening," Zerbe said. "The continued
deterioration in the credit markets is taking a significant toll."
That MBI looks very interesting to me. I almost jumped on it last week, glad I didnt.
Financials turned nasty, look terrible.
From the surface CFC looks cheap, but they still carry a 3.6 B market cap.
I bet if anything they reorganize..not go under completely..so the downside on the stock might be minimized..
Gunners, HANS is a stock I could own and really not stress about. Another is WFMI. Both are market leaders near the lows for the year, numbers look reasonable and I dont think either have the risk to get nailed. I would feel safer owning HANS or WFMI than say a lofty stock like CMG.
0
That MBI looks very interesting to me. I almost jumped on it last week, glad I didnt.
Financials turned nasty, look terrible.
From the surface CFC looks cheap, but they still carry a 3.6 B market cap.
I bet if anything they reorganize..not go under completely..so the downside on the stock might be minimized..
Gunners, HANS is a stock I could own and really not stress about. Another is WFMI. Both are market leaders near the lows for the year, numbers look reasonable and I dont think either have the risk to get nailed. I would feel safer owning HANS or WFMI than say a lofty stock like CMG.
Bond insurers are beginning to realize "sizable" losses
on their portfolios of residential mortgage-backed securities,
refunding income has slumped and there's been a sharp slowdown in the
use of municipal bond insurance, Ken Zerbe and colleagues at Morgan
Stanley wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday.
"The headwinds facing
the guarantors appear to be worsening," Zerbe said. "The continued
deterioration in the credit markets is taking a significant toll."
Think this bodes well for WB's new muni bond insurance co to really clean up...
0
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
see below:
Bond insurers are beginning to realize "sizable" losses
on their portfolios of residential mortgage-backed securities,
refunding income has slumped and there's been a sharp slowdown in the
use of municipal bond insurance, Ken Zerbe and colleagues at Morgan
Stanley wrote in a note to clients on Tuesday.
"The headwinds facing
the guarantors appear to be worsening," Zerbe said. "The continued
deterioration in the credit markets is taking a significant toll."
Think this bodes well for WB's new muni bond insurance co to really clean up...
wall - my brother covered those debt insurers and when MBI announced last week they had $8b in subprime cdo exposure, even the analysts didnt know about that
caveat emptor with any of these
0
wall - my brother covered those debt insurers and when MBI announced last week they had $8b in subprime cdo exposure, even the analysts didnt know about that
If the market is soft for all insurers then it will be as tough for WBs firm as it is for other firms.
In fact if the conditions continue or worsen, it might be a BAD business decision to enter into a risky business like this.
Just think if the FED stops the money train, if our currency isnt cheap relative to the rest of the world, what will that mean to demand for ANY debt, municipal, federal, any kind of debt?
WB might be making a pretty big mistake for such a safe looking investment on the surface.
0
Vermeer,
If the market is soft for all insurers then it will be as tough for WBs firm as it is for other firms.
In fact if the conditions continue or worsen, it might be a BAD business decision to enter into a risky business like this.
Just think if the FED stops the money train, if our currency isnt cheap relative to the rest of the world, what will that mean to demand for ANY debt, municipal, federal, any kind of debt?
WB might be making a pretty big mistake for such a safe looking investment on the surface.
I think WB knows risk analysis better than anyone. And I think he knows that the panic level that might come from municipalities unable to get financing from regular sources will enable him to really really stick it to them in premiums.He is going to make them pay through the nose to get financing from a pristine balance sheet company.
0
I think WB knows risk analysis better than anyone. And I think he knows that the panic level that might come from municipalities unable to get financing from regular sources will enable him to really really stick it to them in premiums.He is going to make them pay through the nose to get financing from a pristine balance sheet company.
WB isnt perfect and does make mistakes, and I think he might be making one of those mistakes in this case.
Good thing for him, since his company is so big you can make mistakes and not have them really hurt the overall operations.
If every other insurer is having troubles, thinking that WB can come in and take over the industry doesnt make sense to me. The group is having troubles, and the answer isnt having minicipalities "pay through the nose", that would be a huge mistake. You cannot do business charging excessive fees for services. If his approach is to overcharge to mitigate risk I am quite sure these municipalities will take their business elsewhere.
I wish I could go into a troubled line of business and just charge everyone huge fees and think that would make me a millionaire.
Many people exaggerate WB, I am not a disciple of his at all. He made his money when market transparency didnt exist. He could never replicate his successes in this market. Good for him, but I look at the current market and opportunites, not that WB bot Sees and Coke 30 yrs ago.
JMHO
0
Vermeer,
WB isnt perfect and does make mistakes, and I think he might be making one of those mistakes in this case.
Good thing for him, since his company is so big you can make mistakes and not have them really hurt the overall operations.
If every other insurer is having troubles, thinking that WB can come in and take over the industry doesnt make sense to me. The group is having troubles, and the answer isnt having minicipalities "pay through the nose", that would be a huge mistake. You cannot do business charging excessive fees for services. If his approach is to overcharge to mitigate risk I am quite sure these municipalities will take their business elsewhere.
I wish I could go into a troubled line of business and just charge everyone huge fees and think that would make me a millionaire.
Many people exaggerate WB, I am not a disciple of his at all. He made his money when market transparency didnt exist. He could never replicate his successes in this market. Good for him, but I look at the current market and opportunites, not that WB bot Sees and Coke 30 yrs ago.
could not disagree more wall,,,they will pay extra for the security of a real aaa rating and the confidence of dealing with a sure thing in buffet,,now im not saying i think that way but others will ,just watch
0
could not disagree more wall,,,they will pay extra for the security of a real aaa rating and the confidence of dealing with a sure thing in buffet,,now im not saying i think that way but others will ,just watch
Wall, the question is, are they really going to be able to "take their business and go elsewhere?" And secondarily, who determines when fees are "excessive" ???
I think Buffett is going to hire an awful lot of good people who do old fashioned, thorough, risk analysis (something that that industry, among many others has not done for years) and, without being in any way compelled to go after stupid business, will make a lot of money out of the huge mistakes the previous companies created for themselves.
0
Wall, the question is, are they really going to be able to "take their business and go elsewhere?" And secondarily, who determines when fees are "excessive" ???
I think Buffett is going to hire an awful lot of good people who do old fashioned, thorough, risk analysis (something that that industry, among many others has not done for years) and, without being in any way compelled to go after stupid business, will make a lot of money out of the huge mistakes the previous companies created for themselves.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.