Yep, those were also severe times, for sure. The 2000 implosion of tech, though, was only tech in March of that year-----the "old economy" held on until September, and then went caput.
JAX-
SMN, I would say, is way overbought. But yes, it can go to 678 for all we know in this sort of atmosphere.
0
WSC-
Yep, those were also severe times, for sure. The 2000 implosion of tech, though, was only tech in March of that year-----the "old economy" held on until September, and then went caput.
JAX-
SMN, I would say, is way overbought. But yes, it can go to 678 for all we know in this sort of atmosphere.
Wall, you may wish to reserve judgment over what trumps what...methinks we are just warming up for the real roasting to come.As usual I hope I am wrong but...
The SKF trade remains the most consistent thing I have dealt with in a while. Buy at 100, listen to some dolt announce a new program and "the end of the crisis", and then wait. Put a stop loss in at 140, and repeat...
0
Wall, you may wish to reserve judgment over what trumps what...methinks we are just warming up for the real roasting to come.As usual I hope I am wrong but...
The SKF trade remains the most consistent thing I have dealt with in a while. Buy at 100, listen to some dolt announce a new program and "the end of the crisis", and then wait. Put a stop loss in at 140, and repeat...
Believe it or not, I am not nearly as bearish long term as I was a few weeks ago.
Why? The almighty "market" (price of commodities) is basically pricing in a depression, so that tells me right there it won't happen right now. The media have piled on, too, so that is another negative. Thirdly, too many from "the public" would now agree with warlord and fiefdom talk, so strike 3.
Hey, I ante-d up Monday with 2 longterms----SYY and GTLS. Need something to beat money markets.
0
WSC-
Believe it or not, I am not nearly as bearish long term as I was a few weeks ago.
Why? The almighty "market" (price of commodities) is basically pricing in a depression, so that tells me right there it won't happen right now. The media have piled on, too, so that is another negative. Thirdly, too many from "the public" would now agree with warlord and fiefdom talk, so strike 3.
Hey, I ante-d up Monday with 2 longterms----SYY and GTLS. Need something to beat money markets.
Clay, all of the people I know who are smarter than me are far more gloomy about the situation than I am. Glad to see you're starting to come around. As a longtime "fade the public guy" I agree with your above comments.
0
Clay, all of the people I know who are smarter than me are far more gloomy about the situation than I am. Glad to see you're starting to come around. As a longtime "fade the public guy" I agree with your above comments.
I made the comment in a nice way, that you are the resident bunker specialist and that piece was pretty damn bearish.
Not sure if you guys were trading (outside Koaj) back when the Naz went from 5k plus to 1800 in 9 months but that is the equiv of seeing the DOW go from 13k to 6k or less, so even though this is pretty broad it doesnt compare to the Naz disaster and the tech destruction it brought.
The fear in the market after they opened after 9-11 was stronger than this..fear in the general population which is nothing compared to this. I think THIS fear isnt understood yet by the general population, that it is inside economic circles versus the general population because it cannot be explained or quantified to the average joe.
I have that builder friend I reference and he keeps sending me these stupid Clinton bashing youtube clips saying it was Clinton back in 1996 who modified the housing regulations to lend more to the lower income and that magically created the subprime mess. I had to gently explain it to him that his republican POV was wrong and that it was leverage that caused this and the LOSS on a lower price range property is nothing compared to a mid to high range house..so 2-3 of those terrible low income defaulters can go bad versus one in the neighborhood he lives. It never ceases to amaze me how repubs equate lower income as the cause of social ills.
I am seeing more and more income bond funds popping up on my new lows list..NMT, MEN, VAZ, GYC, PHB, JPP, MUS all hitting lows.
0
CC,
I made the comment in a nice way, that you are the resident bunker specialist and that piece was pretty damn bearish.
Not sure if you guys were trading (outside Koaj) back when the Naz went from 5k plus to 1800 in 9 months but that is the equiv of seeing the DOW go from 13k to 6k or less, so even though this is pretty broad it doesnt compare to the Naz disaster and the tech destruction it brought.
The fear in the market after they opened after 9-11 was stronger than this..fear in the general population which is nothing compared to this. I think THIS fear isnt understood yet by the general population, that it is inside economic circles versus the general population because it cannot be explained or quantified to the average joe.
I have that builder friend I reference and he keeps sending me these stupid Clinton bashing youtube clips saying it was Clinton back in 1996 who modified the housing regulations to lend more to the lower income and that magically created the subprime mess. I had to gently explain it to him that his republican POV was wrong and that it was leverage that caused this and the LOSS on a lower price range property is nothing compared to a mid to high range house..so 2-3 of those terrible low income defaulters can go bad versus one in the neighborhood he lives. It never ceases to amaze me how repubs equate lower income as the cause of social ills.
I am seeing more and more income bond funds popping up on my new lows list..NMT, MEN, VAZ, GYC, PHB, JPP, MUS all hitting lows.
"Leverage" is a term I keep hearing but have no idea what it means pertaining to this situation. Will somebody please explain this and then I'll quit cluttering your stock talk thread
0
"Leverage" is a term I keep hearing but have no idea what it means pertaining to this situation. Will somebody please explain this and then I'll quit cluttering your stock talk thread
"Leverage" in options simply means being able to potentially use lots more shares than you could by holding the common (long or short).
1 contract equals 100 shares with options.
For istance, take JPM for example. Oct 32.5 calls trade for about 9 bucks a contract. Buy 1 contract for 900 bucks, and you got "potentially" control of 100 shares. To do that with common, it would cost 4100 dollars, or thereabouts.
Problem with options are these:
1) Spreads
2) Time decay
3) Illiquidity
0
Jason-
"Leverage" in options simply means being able to potentially use lots more shares than you could by holding the common (long or short).
1 contract equals 100 shares with options.
For istance, take JPM for example. Oct 32.5 calls trade for about 9 bucks a contract. Buy 1 contract for 900 bucks, and you got "potentially" control of 100 shares. To do that with common, it would cost 4100 dollars, or thereabouts.
You are welcome here and with your experience and insight I hope you hang around more.
Ive made my 10 paragraph explanation of this so many times I embarrass myself..here it is in a nutshell.
Lenders were giving more loans relative to assets than they should have and banking regulators and lending regulators werent stopping this from happening..so now instead of Wamu taking a hit on some loans because of a bad RE market, they lent so much and were LEVERAGED that as bad loans started coming in, they started getting margin calls from THEIR lenders and had to bring more cash to cover not only bad mortgages but the margin calls on top of normal losses.
Investment firms were purchasing CDO's at monster margin ratios, so instead of the CDO's going down and the bank having some losses on paper, since they bought so much of the instruments relative to their assets, they were leveraged and now these instruments come down a little and they start getting margin calls, thats why C and GS and others have been raising capital for the last year..then when firms like BSC couldnt go to the window and borrow enough, the CDO trading market started to freeze since firms were trying to sell and nobody was buying..then due to accounting rules, these investments are "mark to market" or valued at the BID of the market..so as the CDO market froze, the bid started dropping and the "value" started to drop because of them being illiquid and more margin calls, a tsunami in the CDO market due to an illiquid market.
The real value of the CDOs on a lower leveraged basis probably isnt that bad but if you margin at MONSTER rates, a little drop outside their computer model caused disasterous results.
0
JWK,
You are welcome here and with your experience and insight I hope you hang around more.
Ive made my 10 paragraph explanation of this so many times I embarrass myself..here it is in a nutshell.
Lenders were giving more loans relative to assets than they should have and banking regulators and lending regulators werent stopping this from happening..so now instead of Wamu taking a hit on some loans because of a bad RE market, they lent so much and were LEVERAGED that as bad loans started coming in, they started getting margin calls from THEIR lenders and had to bring more cash to cover not only bad mortgages but the margin calls on top of normal losses.
Investment firms were purchasing CDO's at monster margin ratios, so instead of the CDO's going down and the bank having some losses on paper, since they bought so much of the instruments relative to their assets, they were leveraged and now these instruments come down a little and they start getting margin calls, thats why C and GS and others have been raising capital for the last year..then when firms like BSC couldnt go to the window and borrow enough, the CDO trading market started to freeze since firms were trying to sell and nobody was buying..then due to accounting rules, these investments are "mark to market" or valued at the BID of the market..so as the CDO market froze, the bid started dropping and the "value" started to drop because of them being illiquid and more margin calls, a tsunami in the CDO market due to an illiquid market.
The real value of the CDOs on a lower leveraged basis probably isnt that bad but if you margin at MONSTER rates, a little drop outside their computer model caused disasterous results.
350 point DOW drop in last 30 minutes------on top of what? 7 down days in a row now?
When will peeps capitulate? 7500 on Dow? 7200 on Dow? 0.00 on Dow?
Crazy.
Makes me think something bad is going to happen overnight. As in REALLY, REALLY, REALLY BAD----not just some random financial company "warning" about Q3-----as if no one knew.
This last 30 minutes has me believing an entire country goes caput tonight------along with everything in it (debts and all).
0
350 point DOW drop in last 30 minutes------on top of what? 7 down days in a row now?
When will peeps capitulate? 7500 on Dow? 7200 on Dow? 0.00 on Dow?
Crazy.
Makes me think something bad is going to happen overnight. As in REALLY, REALLY, REALLY BAD----not just some random financial company "warning" about Q3-----as if no one knew.
This last 30 minutes has me believing an entire country goes caput tonight------along with everything in it (debts and all).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.