The market may want something, but does not have the capacity to overrule reality but for so long.And the essential reality is like you say, no the banking crisis is not done, far from it.And on that basis, SKF will remain an interesting and volatile play for some time.
SKF @ 91?
The market may want something, but does not have the capacity to overrule reality but for so long.And the essential reality is like you say, no the banking crisis is not done, far from it.And on that basis, SKF will remain an interesting and volatile play for some time.
The market may want something, but does not have the capacity to overrule reality but for so long.And the essential reality is like you say, no the banking crisis is not done, far from it.And on that basis, SKF will remain an interesting and volatile play for some time.
Not sure I understand this move. I would be interested to see what others who understand these 200% volatility ETF's better than I do think, but based on the trading pattern of these ETF's,isn't this just about the worst thing you could do? Wouldn't it make more sense to just hold neither than a double long and a double short?
Not sure I understand this move. I would be interested to see what others who understand these 200% volatility ETF's better than I do think, but based on the trading pattern of these ETF's,isn't this just about the worst thing you could do? Wouldn't it make more sense to just hold neither than a double long and a double short?
A bottle of something I can afford if you win? What do you drink?
I'd rather the over under be 40/175
A bottle of something I can afford if you win? What do you drink?
I'd rather the over under be 40/175
Its a deal.Not not one I think I will win necessarily, as manipulation is all in the hands of people who would rather be on your side rather han mine, but heck you are on...
Its a deal.Not not one I think I will win necessarily, as manipulation is all in the hands of people who would rather be on your side rather han mine, but heck you are on...
OK no problem...I will write the check...you are off to a good start...it promises to be an interesting quarter.
You do take Indy Mac paper right?
OK no problem...I will write the check...you are off to a good start...it promises to be an interesting quarter.
You do take Indy Mac paper right?
Not sure I understand this move. I would be interested to see what others who understand these 200% volatility ETF's better than I do think, but based on the trading pattern of these ETF's,isn't this just about the worst thing you could do? Wouldn't it make more sense to just hold neither than a double long and a double short?
I don't follow SKF or UYG . . . but I do follow FAS and FAZ and over time they do errode in value significantly. I mean look at where FAS and FAZ were in early January compared to where they are now!
However . . . for a short term hop in and make some money trade they present incredible value! Especially if you are on the right side. If you know the markets are going to be up jump in and grab some FAS and you get 10-15% in one day . . . if you know they are going to be down or due for a sell off grab some FAZ . . . however, if you are on the wrong side it hurts.
But in the end I am assuming that both will go to $0 if given enough time. Again . . . I would only hold at most one or two days and never over a weekend. But that is just me.
Not sure I understand this move. I would be interested to see what others who understand these 200% volatility ETF's better than I do think, but based on the trading pattern of these ETF's,isn't this just about the worst thing you could do? Wouldn't it make more sense to just hold neither than a double long and a double short?
I don't follow SKF or UYG . . . but I do follow FAS and FAZ and over time they do errode in value significantly. I mean look at where FAS and FAZ were in early January compared to where they are now!
However . . . for a short term hop in and make some money trade they present incredible value! Especially if you are on the right side. If you know the markets are going to be up jump in and grab some FAS and you get 10-15% in one day . . . if you know they are going to be down or due for a sell off grab some FAZ . . . however, if you are on the wrong side it hurts.
But in the end I am assuming that both will go to $0 if given enough time. Again . . . I would only hold at most one or two days and never over a weekend. But that is just me.
honestly im baffled by all of this. i have a few friends who were continuing to play the market but after the Wells numbers yesterday, they got out of everything as they were done with the market. they finally realized that this thing is rigged....when Wells Fargo can blatantly lie and tell you they made 3b in Q1 either through the increased loan spread (fed borrowing v consumer lending) and AIG back doors and call that operating income, i dont think anyone knows what to think of this
big powerful behind the scenes money and forces wants equities up
honestly im baffled by all of this. i have a few friends who were continuing to play the market but after the Wells numbers yesterday, they got out of everything as they were done with the market. they finally realized that this thing is rigged....when Wells Fargo can blatantly lie and tell you they made 3b in Q1 either through the increased loan spread (fed borrowing v consumer lending) and AIG back doors and call that operating income, i dont think anyone knows what to think of this
big powerful behind the scenes money and forces wants equities up
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see equities up..who doesn't?
However...I got a laugh out of this cogent recap...
"What you're seeing Bernanke do is he's trying to create a bailout
reflationary bubble, which he can't describe as a bubble, just as
Greenspan couldn't describe the housing mortgage bubble as a bubble.What we're seeing by Bernanke is a covert attempt to rebubble,"Phillips told Reuters.
Meanwhile, Nouriel Roubini - who's been mostly right about the crisis -says that [Jim] "Cramer is a buffoon."
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see equities up..who doesn't?
However...I got a laugh out of this cogent recap...
"What you're seeing Bernanke do is he's trying to create a bailout
reflationary bubble, which he can't describe as a bubble, just as
Greenspan couldn't describe the housing mortgage bubble as a bubble.What we're seeing by Bernanke is a covert attempt to rebubble,"Phillips told Reuters.
Meanwhile, Nouriel Roubini - who's been mostly right about the crisis -says that [Jim] "Cramer is a buffoon."
I dont think the numbers are baked or manipulated, Wells didnt leverage to the severity say that Citi did, they picked up some profitable assets really cheap, so yeah I think the odds that they are getting closer to being finished is actually pretty good.
I dont think the numbers are baked or manipulated, Wells didnt leverage to the severity say that Citi did, they picked up some profitable assets really cheap, so yeah I think the odds that they are getting closer to being finished is actually pretty good.
they can pick up an extra 200-300 basis points on every dollar loaned. of course they are making money hand over fist
they can pick up an extra 200-300 basis points on every dollar loaned. of course they are making money hand over fist
Wells showed that if you dont overleverage and plan correctly, you can be there to scoop up bargains, and that is what they did.
Rates are going to stay low for a while, so yeah whatever they lend out will have good returns. I dont know how much of their profits are related to borrowing from the FED relative to their other business?
I recall that they didnt want the money, much like JP, they were never in severe straits like others who are STILL over-extended.
Wells showed that if you dont overleverage and plan correctly, you can be there to scoop up bargains, and that is what they did.
Rates are going to stay low for a while, so yeah whatever they lend out will have good returns. I dont know how much of their profits are related to borrowing from the FED relative to their other business?
I recall that they didnt want the money, much like JP, they were never in severe straits like others who are STILL over-extended.
As I recall, not from experience, 1934 was not a good year...but like everyone, I would like to think we are going to come out of it OK
As I recall, not from experience, 1934 was not a good year...but like everyone, I would like to think we are going to come out of it OK
The Baby Boom mind is not able to process anything that does not start or end immediately. They are going to have to learn...from a Zine...
When we last visited the S&P
web site a few weeks ago, the P/E ratio for the quarter ending September 30 was
around 181. I must confess that when I looked at it today, as jaded as I am, I
was shocked. You can see the numbers for yourself at https://www2.standardandpoors.
The P/E ratio for the end of the second quarter is 1944 (not a typo). The losses of the 4th quarter wipe out almost all earnings for the 12 months ending June 30. But by the end of the 3rd quarter, the estimated P/E ratio has dropped to a (negative) -467. That has never happened. We have never seen negative earnings over a 12-month period since WWII. (I don't have data for the Depression era.)
Then as the negative earnings of the 4th quarter of 2008 drop off, we see the estimated P/E ratio rise back to 30, which is quite high. However, if actual earnings come in lower, as I think they will, the P/E ratio will rise and/or the market will fall as negative earnings surprises just keep on coming.
The Baby Boom mind is not able to process anything that does not start or end immediately. They are going to have to learn...from a Zine...
When we last visited the S&P
web site a few weeks ago, the P/E ratio for the quarter ending September 30 was
around 181. I must confess that when I looked at it today, as jaded as I am, I
was shocked. You can see the numbers for yourself at https://www2.standardandpoors.
The P/E ratio for the end of the second quarter is 1944 (not a typo). The losses of the 4th quarter wipe out almost all earnings for the 12 months ending June 30. But by the end of the 3rd quarter, the estimated P/E ratio has dropped to a (negative) -467. That has never happened. We have never seen negative earnings over a 12-month period since WWII. (I don't have data for the Depression era.)
Then as the negative earnings of the 4th quarter of 2008 drop off, we see the estimated P/E ratio rise back to 30, which is quite high. However, if actual earnings come in lower, as I think they will, the P/E ratio will rise and/or the market will fall as negative earnings surprises just keep on coming.
I am not shorting much of anything.In fact I have profited from GS for quite some time after realizing the government was dedicated to their prosperity above all things.
However, I do not for one second feel that they have solved the financial crisis.If it were as easy as printing the money, life would be grand and easy.It isn't either one.
The amount of these programs is huge, but when compared to the losses sustained world wide, they are a drop in the bucket.
In sum, I hope the masses do buy in, listen to the same people who created the crisis, and they do manage to gin up a false rally on their faith in these people. I will be happily selling selected issues, accumulating gold, and buying the favored few that the Treasury and the Fed have ordained as the winners of the debacle.
I am not shorting much of anything.In fact I have profited from GS for quite some time after realizing the government was dedicated to their prosperity above all things.
However, I do not for one second feel that they have solved the financial crisis.If it were as easy as printing the money, life would be grand and easy.It isn't either one.
The amount of these programs is huge, but when compared to the losses sustained world wide, they are a drop in the bucket.
In sum, I hope the masses do buy in, listen to the same people who created the crisis, and they do manage to gin up a false rally on their faith in these people. I will be happily selling selected issues, accumulating gold, and buying the favored few that the Treasury and the Fed have ordained as the winners of the debacle.
Hot Forum Topics
-
Wednesday 09/23/2026
456
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
259,822
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
58,367
-
Couple thoughts
4,274
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
15,145
-
***Macwesties * Wed. Sept. 23, 2026 * MLB Baseball Plays***
1,668
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,802
-
Wednesday
2,448
-
pg mlb 2026 season thread
6,769
-
I Thought Trump Campaigned on Lowering Prices!?!?
29,492
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
