This angle took a rare loss on Tuesday.
There are no qualifying plays for Wednesday.
The "Mystery Angle" identifies one early game on Thursday:
YANKEES -185
Personally that's too rich for me given what I have determined to be only a small edge over the Royals.
I'll look for better betting opportunities on the evening card.
BOL to you all today
The "Mystery Angle" identifies one early game on Thursday:
YANKEES -185
Personally that's too rich for me given what I have determined to be only a small edge over the Royals.
I'll look for better betting opportunities on the evening card.
BOL to you all today
Winner
No further plays for Thursday.
Winner
No further plays for Thursday.
Winner
No further plays for Thursday.
Winner
No further plays for Thursday.
?? There were no plays Friday due to my main computer issues.
The "Mystery Angle" indicates 5 for Saturday, June 26:
Anything less than 4 - 1 is a losing day, and that could very well happen.
WHITESOX -190
BLUEJAYS -285
BREWERS -200
DODGERS -195
PADRES -275
* I don't know yet if I will actually bet any of these. Maybe.
In every case, the team has an edge on the mound and offensively.
But a lot of teams with those edges still manage to lose.
BoL today with your bets!
?? There were no plays Friday due to my main computer issues.
The "Mystery Angle" indicates 5 for Saturday, June 26:
Anything less than 4 - 1 is a losing day, and that could very well happen.
WHITESOX -190
BLUEJAYS -285
BREWERS -200
DODGERS -195
PADRES -275
* I don't know yet if I will actually bet any of these. Maybe.
In every case, the team has an edge on the mound and offensively.
But a lot of teams with those edges still manage to lose.
BoL today with your bets!
Just a quick question, does starting pitchers matter in your ‘Mystery Angle’? Or it’s a play no matter what happens even if pitcher changes.. thanks..
Just a quick question, does starting pitchers matter in your ‘Mystery Angle’? Or it’s a play no matter what happens even if pitcher changes.. thanks..
Listed pitchers at the time of my post.
I just woke up, so has something changed?!
Listed pitchers at the time of my post.
I just woke up, so has something changed?!
Also, when I began this thread, it was a result from looking back at my capping notes and I noticed that heavy HOME favorites (at least -170) were winning at an much stronger than expected rate, PROVIDED:
- HOME starter had stats that I judged to be no worse than his opponent, and neither on any "long streak," and
- HOME TEAM had offensive run scoring at least at least as good (specific to home/road venue, and provided not in a batting slump, though opponent could be)
- BUT significantly better in at least one of the two above.
Sometimes, my capping makes all that a very close call and those I do not post.
That said, I see this morning that TWINS -180 will now be included
Also, when I began this thread, it was a result from looking back at my capping notes and I noticed that heavy HOME favorites (at least -170) were winning at an much stronger than expected rate, PROVIDED:
- HOME starter had stats that I judged to be no worse than his opponent, and neither on any "long streak," and
- HOME TEAM had offensive run scoring at least at least as good (specific to home/road venue, and provided not in a batting slump, though opponent could be)
- BUT significantly better in at least one of the two above.
Sometimes, my capping makes all that a very close call and those I do not post.
That said, I see this morning that TWINS -180 will now be included
Agreed. Me too!
However, as KEYelement has repeated in this forum (others too, probably!) that it comes down to assessing the return based on the probability it will occur. For example, we might like a -175 favorite *IF* we judge they have at least a 2 to 1 chance of winning. But as I am sure you know, *usually* the line on heavy favorites rises (squares betting??) or is set at above its anticipated true value. So as you allude to, caution is always in order with heavy favs. That's why I don't necessarily bet any of these angle plays I post in this thread.
On a similar note, typically if my capping indicates any close call but still leans to a pick (of any value) I just PASS. I used to think that if I just bet on all my "leans" that I should still come out ahead over time. But losing is a hard teacher. LOL
Agreed. Me too!
However, as KEYelement has repeated in this forum (others too, probably!) that it comes down to assessing the return based on the probability it will occur. For example, we might like a -175 favorite *IF* we judge they have at least a 2 to 1 chance of winning. But as I am sure you know, *usually* the line on heavy favorites rises (squares betting??) or is set at above its anticipated true value. So as you allude to, caution is always in order with heavy favs. That's why I don't necessarily bet any of these angle plays I post in this thread.
On a similar note, typically if my capping indicates any close call but still leans to a pick (of any value) I just PASS. I used to think that if I just bet on all my "leans" that I should still come out ahead over time. But losing is a hard teacher. LOL
Hmmmm.............well...........maybe. That's a lot of chalk though. I would double-check the pre-game lineups to be certain there are no "surprises" before making a bet at those odds.
Hmmmm.............well...........maybe. That's a lot of chalk though. I would double-check the pre-game lineups to be certain there are no "surprises" before making a bet at those odds.
@fubah2
Haha, nothing changed. I’m just checking and confirming for future bets. Anyway, really thankful for all your thoughts and picks here. Really helped me a lot
@fubah2
Haha, nothing changed. I’m just checking and confirming for future bets. Anyway, really thankful for all your thoughts and picks here. Really helped me a lot
The "Mystery Angle" indicates 5 for Saturday, June 26:
xxx WHITESOX -190
xxx TWINS -180
W BLUEJAYS -285
W BREWERS -200
W DODGERS -195
L PADRES -275
This "select heavy home favs" angle went 3 - 1 for a tiny +0.25 units net
Since I altered my ML sides capping method on June 14:
2 - 0 June 14
2 - 0 June 15
2 - 0 June 16
2 - 0 June 17
2 - 0 June 18
1 - 0 June 19
xxx June 20
xxx June 21
0 - 1 June 22 (NYY -275)
xxx June 23
1 - 0 June 24
xxx June 25
3 - 1 June 26 (+0.25 net)
= 15 - 2 and +12.50 units net in 13 days
42 days tracking here: 54 - 15 for +22.50 units net
"Mystery Angle" YTD: 67 - 18 (*mean average price is -207)
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this one (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or two!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
This angle could be slowing down now. Be careful. Choose wisely!
BoL with your Sunday bets!
The "Mystery Angle" indicates 5 for Saturday, June 26:
xxx WHITESOX -190
xxx TWINS -180
W BLUEJAYS -285
W BREWERS -200
W DODGERS -195
L PADRES -275
This "select heavy home favs" angle went 3 - 1 for a tiny +0.25 units net
Since I altered my ML sides capping method on June 14:
2 - 0 June 14
2 - 0 June 15
2 - 0 June 16
2 - 0 June 17
2 - 0 June 18
1 - 0 June 19
xxx June 20
xxx June 21
0 - 1 June 22 (NYY -275)
xxx June 23
1 - 0 June 24
xxx June 25
3 - 1 June 26 (+0.25 net)
= 15 - 2 and +12.50 units net in 13 days
42 days tracking here: 54 - 15 for +22.50 units net
"Mystery Angle" YTD: 67 - 18 (*mean average price is -207)
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this one (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or two!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
This angle could be slowing down now. Be careful. Choose wisely!
BoL with your Sunday bets!
3 - 1 June 26 (+0.25 net) = 15 - 2 and +12.50 units net in 13 days
42 days tracking here: 54 - 15 for +22.50 units net
"Mystery Angle" YTD: 67 - 18 (*mean average price is -207)
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this one (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or two!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
This angle could be slowing down now. Be careful. Choose wisely!
BoL with your Sunday bets!
The "Mystery Angle" indicates these for Sunday, June 27:
BLUEJAYS -225 (Bet365)
BREWERS -185 (BetCRIS)
PADRES -260 (Bet365)
NOTE: all 3 have both the edge on the mound and offensively
I'm waiting to see the pregame lineups before I actually bet such high prices
BoL to y'all
3 - 1 June 26 (+0.25 net) = 15 - 2 and +12.50 units net in 13 days
42 days tracking here: 54 - 15 for +22.50 units net
"Mystery Angle" YTD: 67 - 18 (*mean average price is -207)
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this one (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or two!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
This angle could be slowing down now. Be careful. Choose wisely!
BoL with your Sunday bets!
The "Mystery Angle" indicates these for Sunday, June 27:
BLUEJAYS -225 (Bet365)
BREWERS -185 (BetCRIS)
PADRES -260 (Bet365)
NOTE: all 3 have both the edge on the mound and offensively
I'm waiting to see the pregame lineups before I actually bet such high prices
BoL to y'all
3 - 0 Sunday = 18 - 2 for +15.50 units net in 14 days
43 days posted/tracking here: 57 - 15 for +25.50 units net
"Mystery Angle" YTD: 70 - 18 (*mean average price is -207)
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this streak (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or 2, or 3!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
Choose wisely!
3 - 0 Sunday = 18 - 2 for +15.50 units net in 14 days
43 days posted/tracking here: 57 - 15 for +25.50 units net
"Mystery Angle" YTD: 70 - 18 (*mean average price is -207)
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this streak (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or 2, or 3!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
Choose wisely!
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this streak (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or 2, or 3!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
Choose wisely!
The "Mystery Angle" for Monday, indicates only one qualifier:
ASTROS -330
Proceed at your own risk. Be cautious with the price of heavy favs.
As the wins rise on ANY streak, such as this streak (or a starter's
long string of consecutive games without a truly BAD outing)
so too rises an ever increasing probability of a "correction" (losing day, or 2, or 3!)
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough.
Choose wisely!
The "Mystery Angle" for Monday, indicates only one qualifier:
ASTROS -330
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough. Choose wisely!
The "Mystery Angle" for Monday, indicates only one qualifier:
L ASTROS -330
Astros lost on Monday.
The Mystery Angle has identified these for Tuesday (based on overnight lines):
REDSOX -180
INDIANS -180
ATHLETICS -180
ROCKIES -170
BLUEJAYS -192
ASTROS ??? line later
These do not necessarily represent MY BETS.
I post my actual bets in a separate thread.
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later.
I cannot emphasize this enough.
Choose wisely!
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later. I cannot emphasize this enough. Choose wisely!
The "Mystery Angle" for Monday, indicates only one qualifier:
L ASTROS -330
Astros lost on Monday.
The Mystery Angle has identified these for Tuesday (based on overnight lines):
REDSOX -180
INDIANS -180
ATHLETICS -180
ROCKIES -170
BLUEJAYS -192
ASTROS ??? line later
These do not necessarily represent MY BETS.
I post my actual bets in a separate thread.
Some regression is inevitable, sooner or later.
I cannot emphasize this enough.
Choose wisely!
The Mystery Angle has identified these for Tuesday (based on overnight lines):
REDSOX -180
INDIANS -180
ATHLETICS -180
ROCKIES -170
BLUEJAYS -192
ASTROS ??? line later
These do not necessarily represent MY BETS.
I post my actual bets in a separate thread.
Line used for ASTROS will be -300
The Mystery Angle has identified these for Tuesday (based on overnight lines):
REDSOX -180
INDIANS -180
ATHLETICS -180
ROCKIES -170
BLUEJAYS -192
ASTROS ??? line later
These do not necessarily represent MY BETS.
I post my actual bets in a separate thread.
Line used for ASTROS will be -300
Line used for ASTROS will be -300
And that is for Urquidy/Lakins
Line used for ASTROS will be -300
And that is for Urquidy/Lakins
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.