All Forums | MLB Betting

🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 56272
Posts: 1743
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #826

Quote Originally Posted by insatiable:

@fubah2

cloveran_cheers

@insatiable

 Thank you, and BoL with your bets today! an_2drinks

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #827

Couldn't cap the Pitt/TOR game earlier because Pirates had not named a SP

Now Falter is listed

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #828

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Couldn't cap the Pitt/TOR game earlier because Pirates had not named a SP Now Falter is listed

By the looks of it, this may be a dead-even match going in.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 9183
Posted: #829

@fubah2

 clover

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2018
Posts: 33
Posted: #830

@fubah2

 BOL today with your bets. Always a pleasure to read your threads and capping angles. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1609
Posted: #831

@fubah2

I have noticed 5 of my 6 teams' lines are moving more negative and the Orioles are staying at -140.  The Dodgers, Guardians, Brewers, Rangers and Red Sox have all gone significantly more negative.  On average, is this good or bad?  I have seen mixed results.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 188
Posted: #832

clover

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #833

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Couldn't cap the Pitt/TOR game earlier because Pirates had not named a SP Now Falter is listed By the looks of it, this may be a dead-even match going in.

Yep, dead-even.   This is a "value" bet game where my capping stats indicate a virtual coin-flipper - ie, no discernible edge to either team but one side is getting SIGNIFICANT "plus money" on the ML (ie greater than +120). an_2drinks Same for the Det/BOS game!

 

Personally I am not betting either this time around as I am re-evaluating my methods...

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #834

Quote Originally Posted by Premian:

@fubah2 I have noticed 5 of my 6 teams' lines are moving more negative and the Orioles are staying at -140.  The Dodgers, Guardians, Brewers, Rangers and Red Sox have all gone significantly more negative.  On average, is this good or bad?  I have seen mixed results.
Steam?

Different cappers have different views on this. Personally, I pay no attention unless it's a significant move on BOTH the moneyline *AND* total....because then it is almost always a "player" issue which most surely could impact my bet.  I watch the injury reports closely  especially in the 90 mins prior to first pitch.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1609
Posted: #835

@fubah2

Yeah, I should watch both the Moneyline and Total to see if they are making a significant move together.  Thanks  clover

I think the Red Sox may be expected to score about an extra half a run tonight on average.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #836

@OO7CRUSHER peace_5 clover

@yourpalhal clover peace_5

@Premian cloverthumbs_up

 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #837

Quote Originally Posted by NBAKiller21:

@fubah2  BOL today with your bets.

Always a pleasure to read your threads and capping angles.

@NBAKiller21

 Thanks! peace_5 I do hope it is at least of some help on occasion!

BoL with your bets today! clover thumbs_up

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #838

Quote Originally Posted by wolfeman3:

@fubah2  Tailed ya a bit Partner with Phi -1 and Balty ml… Nothing wild just some action.  Hey Aloha Friday, and I think you go 4-2 and collect yet again

@wolfeman3

peace_5  BoL with your bets this weekend! Enjoy! an_2drinks

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #839

So tonight watching to see who if any of the starters currently on extended HOT STREAKS without a bad outing, has a "bad outing"

Houck, Boston (8)

Lopez, Atlanta (9)

Blanco, Houston (9)

 

However, even if a "streaker" has a bad outing that does not mean his team loses, since his team's bats may or may not bail him out...

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #840

Originally my capping sheets indicated TEXAS had a fair edge and with a small ML was worthy of a bet.....but I backed off upon further review because I am testing  a new idea to my capping methods - putting more emphasis on the "change of venue fortunes" - particularly if the recent stint elsewhere was either good or poor......more or less along the lines of a team being "due" for a change in recent outcomes....

....we shall see....  but I backed away from TEXAS as a result of evaluating BOTH Marlins and Rangers recent play....

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #841

TIGGERS  and  PIRATES, both receiving pretty good PLUS MONEY, are the two coin-flipper "value" bets tonight I am evaluating to see if my capping was more or less fairly accurate in assessing how close the matchups are...

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #842

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: UNDERS?  

Friday games my handicapping suggest may go UNDER (but I didn't bet!)

        Cubs game  8

        Orioles game   if taking 9 alt-line

        BoSox game    if taking 9 alt-line

        Braves game   if taking 9 alt-line

Those alt-lines do carry higher juice of course, but not so high as to make them a bad risk vs the odds of staying under.  I am just tracking these now since giving up betting unders due to losing too often with them.....since then, tracking the unders I should've taken but didn't -- they have won 17 of 24, not yet counting those above.....sigh....

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #843

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

So tonight watching to see who if any of the starters currently on extended HOT STREAKS without a bad outing, has a "bad outing"

Houck, Boston (8)

Lopez, Atlanta (9)

Blanco, Houston (9)

 

However, even if a "streaker" has a bad outing that does not mean his team loses, since his team's bats may or may not bail him out...

BLANCO, Houston yielded 4 earned runs in just 4.2 ip and so that ends his HOT STREAK.  The other two pitchers extend their hot streak, thus increasing the odds they might have a bad outing next time up

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #844

We go to the 13th inning in Toronto, tied at 3.....Two weak bullpens!.... when Jays come to bat it will be the heart of their order...LIVE BET: Jays -145

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #845

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Originally my capping sheets indicated TEXAS had a fair edge and with a small ML was worthy of a bet.....but I backed off upon further review because I am testing  a new idea to my capping methods - putting more emphasis on the "change of venue fortunes" - particularly if the recent stint elsewhere was either good or poor......more or less along the lines of a team being "due" for a change in recent outcomes.... ....we shall see....  but I backed away from TEXAS as a result of evaluating BOTH Marlins and Rangers recent play....
Really glad I backed off that TEXAS play!!!

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #846

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: So tonight watching to see who if any of the starters currently on extended HOT STREAKS without a bad outing, has a "bad outing" Houck, Boston (8) Lopez, Atlanta (9) Blanco, Houston (9)   However, even if a "streaker" has a bad outing that does not mean his team loses, since his team's bats may or may not bail him out...

 

BLANCO, Houston yielded 4 earned runs in just 4.2 ip and so that ends his HOT STREAK.  The other two pitchers extend their hot streak, thus increasing the odds they might have a bad outing next time up

Now looking like that "bad outing" will cost the Astros....

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1609
Posted: #847

@fubah2

 For Sure.  I had Texas as a straight bet, and couldn't regret it more.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #848

FEDDE, CWS, pitched very poorly imo....13 runners on in just 5 ip an_speechless an_getaway

and yet clung to a 5 - 4 lead when he left.....

My Brewskys hitting the ball VERY WELL but stranding people thru poor at bats!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1609
Posted: #849

@fubah2

 Yeah,  but the Brewers are making a comeback now finally.  an_horse   clover 

16 hits so far.

 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 31286
Posted: #850

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

  UNDERS?  

Friday games my handicapping suggest may go UNDER (but I didn't bet!)

        Cubs game  8

        Orioles game   if taking 9 alt-line

        BoSox game    if taking 9 alt-line

        Braves game   if taking 9 alt-line

Those alt-lines do carry higher juice of course, but not so high as to make them a bad risk vs the odds of staying under.  I am just tracking these now since giving up betting unders due to losing too often with them.....since then, tracking the unders I should've taken but didn't -- they have won 17 of 24, not yet counting those above.....sigh....

Woulda gone 2 - 2 had I bet those unders with only a modest loss on juice....

Count over the past week moves to 19 - 9 that woulda stayed UNDER the total (assuming rounding up to a solid integer even with alt-total juice)

All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.