Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Adram805: You can add Kaufee to that list although he is a bit cold at the moment and doesn’t pick every single day. His perspective and insight is as good as gets. Sounds good. Thanks.
Of course it goes without saying you are definitely on that list FUBAH. I come in your thread everyday and love all the information you provide. The quality and dedication is unmatched here. It’s much appreciated and keep up the good work man.
i will second this
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
4
Quote Originally Posted by Adram805:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Adram805: You can add Kaufee to that list although he is a bit cold at the moment and doesn’t pick every single day. His perspective and insight is as good as gets. Sounds good. Thanks.
Of course it goes without saying you are definitely on that list FUBAH. I come in your thread everyday and love all the information you provide. The quality and dedication is unmatched here. It’s much appreciated and keep up the good work man.
As you can see in post #906 above, my record betting UNDERS, sucks!
I pay attention to my own results, so I quit betting them. My handicapping sheets still circles the potential UNDERS every day but I won't defy my own results......and sure enough, as documented here, my indicated UNDERS go on an impressive run of 19 - 9 as of Saturday since I QUIT betting them.
Today, for curiosity sake, this is what my capping sheets indicate...
Most involve taking an alt-totalafter rounding UP to the next highest integer....doing that is what resulted in the recent 19 - 9 run, although there are no guarantees this will continue:
Nationals game....suggest 7.0 net runs ....so under 8 ??
Astros game ....suggests 7.3 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line??
Rockies game ....suggests 9.6 net runs ....so under 11 alt-line??
Angels game ....suggests 7.5 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line??
Had I bet those UNDERS, I would have gone 1 - 3, with big juice losses! So the the run of UNDERS which my handicapping sheets have circled as decent plays SINCE I QUIT BETTING THEM, drops to 20 winners vs 12 losers.....still good, but I won't bet them. HOWEVER, if I was tempted, then today's KC/Cleveland game looks very tempting at the alt-line of 9 total (not 8.5 nor 8.0!) Before I QUIT betting unders, an UNDER 9.0 here would likely get my *BEST BET tag! A great Sp vs a decent SP backed by the BEST bullpen; neither team scary when batting v righties! Breeze inward.....BUT there's an issue: LUGO for KC, as great as he is, is riding a very tenuous 7-game HOT STREAK....IF he implodes, the chances of losing an under 9 increase significantly....
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
As you can see in post #906 above, my record betting UNDERS, sucks!
I pay attention to my own results, so I quit betting them. My handicapping sheets still circles the potential UNDERS every day but I won't defy my own results......and sure enough, as documented here, my indicated UNDERS go on an impressive run of 19 - 9 as of Saturday since I QUIT betting them.
Today, for curiosity sake, this is what my capping sheets indicate...
Most involve taking an alt-totalafter rounding UP to the next highest integer....doing that is what resulted in the recent 19 - 9 run, although there are no guarantees this will continue:
Nationals game....suggest 7.0 net runs ....so under 8 ??
Astros game ....suggests 7.3 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line??
Rockies game ....suggests 9.6 net runs ....so under 11 alt-line??
Angels game ....suggests 7.5 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line??
Had I bet those UNDERS, I would have gone 1 - 3, with big juice losses! So the the run of UNDERS which my handicapping sheets have circled as decent plays SINCE I QUIT BETTING THEM, drops to 20 winners vs 12 losers.....still good, but I won't bet them. HOWEVER, if I was tempted, then today's KC/Cleveland game looks very tempting at the alt-line of 9 total (not 8.5 nor 8.0!) Before I QUIT betting unders, an UNDER 9.0 here would likely get my *BEST BET tag! A great Sp vs a decent SP backed by the BEST bullpen; neither team scary when batting v righties! Breeze inward.....BUT there's an issue: LUGO for KC, as great as he is, is riding a very tenuous 7-game HOT STREAK....IF he implodes, the chances of losing an under 9 increase significantly....
[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]As you can see in post #906 above, my record betting UNDERS, sucks!
I pay attention to my own results, so I quit betting them. My handicapping sheets still circles the potential UNDERS every day but I won't defy my own results......and sure enough, as documented here, my indicated UNDERS go on an impressive run of 20- 12 as of Monday since I QUIT betting them.
Tuesday, for curiosity sake, this is what my capping sheets indicate...
Most involve taking an alt-totalafter rounding UP to the next highest integer....doing that is what resulted in the recent 20 - 12 run, although there are no guarantees this will continue:
Cleveland game....suggest 7.0 net runs ....so under 9.0 ??
Pirates game ....suggests 7.0 net runs ....so under 8.0 ??
Nationals game ....suggests 7.9 net runs ....so under 9.0 alt-line ??
BoSox game ....suggests 7.2 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line ??
Astros game ....suggests 7.8 net runs ....so under 9 ??
Rockies game ....suggests 9.1 net runs ....so under 11 alt-line??
1
[Quote: Originally Posted by fubah2]As you can see in post #906 above, my record betting UNDERS, sucks!
I pay attention to my own results, so I quit betting them. My handicapping sheets still circles the potential UNDERS every day but I won't defy my own results......and sure enough, as documented here, my indicated UNDERS go on an impressive run of 20- 12 as of Monday since I QUIT betting them.
Tuesday, for curiosity sake, this is what my capping sheets indicate...
Most involve taking an alt-totalafter rounding UP to the next highest integer....doing that is what resulted in the recent 20 - 12 run, although there are no guarantees this will continue:
Cleveland game....suggest 7.0 net runs ....so under 9.0 ??
Pirates game ....suggests 7.0 net runs ....so under 8.0 ??
Nationals game ....suggests 7.9 net runs ....so under 9.0 alt-line ??
BoSox game ....suggests 7.2 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line ??
Astros game ....suggests 7.8 net runs ....so under 9 ??
Rockies game ....suggests 9.1 net runs ....so under 11 alt-line??
I use this term "value bets" to apply to games where I can't make a reasonably strong case one way or the other for either team to prevail, but one side is getting significant PLUS MONEY, on what I expect is essentially a 50/50 toss-up (ie, coin-flipper!)
Monday's value bet on Cardinals failed.
A couple of dead-heat coinflippers TODAY would normally qualify: St.Louis and Oakland....both getting good PLUS MONEY in a coin-flip game....EXCEPT: both are starting relievers on the mound. UNCERTAINTY surrounds that!!! I don't need the frickn stress so I'm laying off those coin-flips and looking for other betting opportunities instead.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
VALUE BETS?
I use this term "value bets" to apply to games where I can't make a reasonably strong case one way or the other for either team to prevail, but one side is getting significant PLUS MONEY, on what I expect is essentially a 50/50 toss-up (ie, coin-flipper!)
Monday's value bet on Cardinals failed.
A couple of dead-heat coinflippers TODAY would normally qualify: St.Louis and Oakland....both getting good PLUS MONEY in a coin-flip game....EXCEPT: both are starting relievers on the mound. UNCERTAINTY surrounds that!!! I don't need the frickn stress so I'm laying off those coin-flips and looking for other betting opportunities instead.
This STARTER is riding a tenuous 7-gameHOT STREAK,
WITHOUT a BAD outing in that streak ....YET!
...but this should be anticipated to end at anytime!!!
LUGO, Royals
Make no mistake, this dude and others I will identify in the future are GOOD starters - some of them exceptional! HOWEVER, probability says "consecutive streaks won't last long"...All GOOD pitchers will have an "off" day and get roughed up - sometimes mauled - before they resume their stellar pitching performances again. It happens to the best of them. Just CAN NOT be avoided.
When??? We can't know that for certain but my stats over many years indicate the time to start to worry is after they reach SEVEN (7) consecutive outings without a BAD one in that bunch (at any point in the season, not just from the start) Sure some HOT streaks may continue for 2 or 3 more performances....it happens! But for me, I don't need the stress that his bubble may burst that day. There's 14 other games to look at. I can simply skip those "HOT STREAK" dudes until *AFTER* their inevitable BAD outing beatdown, then resume looking at his starts after that!
2
WARNING: HOT STREAK alert!
This STARTER is riding a tenuous 7-gameHOT STREAK,
WITHOUT a BAD outing in that streak ....YET!
...but this should be anticipated to end at anytime!!!
LUGO, Royals
Make no mistake, this dude and others I will identify in the future are GOOD starters - some of them exceptional! HOWEVER, probability says "consecutive streaks won't last long"...All GOOD pitchers will have an "off" day and get roughed up - sometimes mauled - before they resume their stellar pitching performances again. It happens to the best of them. Just CAN NOT be avoided.
When??? We can't know that for certain but my stats over many years indicate the time to start to worry is after they reach SEVEN (7) consecutive outings without a BAD one in that bunch (at any point in the season, not just from the start) Sure some HOT streaks may continue for 2 or 3 more performances....it happens! But for me, I don't need the stress that his bubble may burst that day. There's 14 other games to look at. I can simply skip those "HOT STREAK" dudes until *AFTER* their inevitable BAD outing beatdown, then resume looking at his starts after that!
like Brewers today Fubah, they have an outstanding results at Phil, thoughts!
I got your Tigers yesterday , appreciate it
What is the one you are liking today?
@VICRRC
I love a good Brewsky! I think they will get some momentum going today v. the Phillies....they are certainly no pushover like the WhiteSox....Phillies had better be ready! I just wish the Brewskys bats were better against lefty starters, then I would likely bet them. For now I will pass but watch with interest. What's your feeling?
I am leaning toward my forlorn CUBBIES today, possibly the series...... Imanaga is terrific, and the best part is he just recently got the inevitable "BAD outing" out of the way and should resume another streak, especially facing the offensively challenged WhiteSox.
While anything can happen, including FLUKES, on any given day, the odds are the WhiteSox are most likely to be held to 3 or fewer runs.... CUBBIES facing a very mediocre FLEXEN should top that easily....
But the price is a VERY HEAVY ML... ....and if a fluke does happen, poof, there goes the equivalent of 3units worth of good money ...
Remember, these WhiteSox very unexpectedly upset CLEVELAND for 3 consecutive games!
I wanted YANKEES but the ML moved quickly out of my range for what I have pegged as a +1.5 run edge. One might suggest taking the RL then.....but I disfavor that on home teams, due to often not getting the final AB in a close 1 run winner....or x-innings.
3
Quote Originally Posted by VICRRC:
like Brewers today Fubah, they have an outstanding results at Phil, thoughts!
I got your Tigers yesterday , appreciate it
What is the one you are liking today?
@VICRRC
I love a good Brewsky! I think they will get some momentum going today v. the Phillies....they are certainly no pushover like the WhiteSox....Phillies had better be ready! I just wish the Brewskys bats were better against lefty starters, then I would likely bet them. For now I will pass but watch with interest. What's your feeling?
I am leaning toward my forlorn CUBBIES today, possibly the series...... Imanaga is terrific, and the best part is he just recently got the inevitable "BAD outing" out of the way and should resume another streak, especially facing the offensively challenged WhiteSox.
While anything can happen, including FLUKES, on any given day, the odds are the WhiteSox are most likely to be held to 3 or fewer runs.... CUBBIES facing a very mediocre FLEXEN should top that easily....
But the price is a VERY HEAVY ML... ....and if a fluke does happen, poof, there goes the equivalent of 3units worth of good money ...
Remember, these WhiteSox very unexpectedly upset CLEVELAND for 3 consecutive games!
I wanted YANKEES but the ML moved quickly out of my range for what I have pegged as a +1.5 run edge. One might suggest taking the RL then.....but I disfavor that on home teams, due to often not getting the final AB in a close 1 run winner....or x-innings.
I think I have too many bets out today. There are 8: Nationals +107 avg., Yankees -167 avg., Rockies +121, Cardinals +127, Braves -165, Padres -108, Orioles -150
Royals @ Guardians Under 8.5 -105
Do any of these look particularly good or bad to you?
0
@fubah2
I think I have too many bets out today. There are 8: Nationals +107 avg., Yankees -167 avg., Rockies +121, Cardinals +127, Braves -165, Padres -108, Orioles -150
Royals @ Guardians Under 8.5 -105
Do any of these look particularly good or bad to you?
ok, enough of this crap, I'm betting against both these pitchers today...and the others coming up...I believe I'll come out ahead
Thanks..
P.S don't trust Glasgow at home tonight, and the Pirates have done well there and out west for years, they swept the Dodgers last year....I'll be fading away
0
@fubah2
ok, enough of this crap, I'm betting against both these pitchers today...and the others coming up...I believe I'll come out ahead
Thanks..
P.S don't trust Glasgow at home tonight, and the Pirates have done well there and out west for years, they swept the Dodgers last year....I'll be fading away
Yeeshh. Take a nap; wake up and.... Pitcher changes!
Williams and his 11 game HOT STREAK (posted earlier) is a non-issue now that they placed him on the DL.....Not enough time for me to evaluate this HERZ lefty from AAA and the game is underway.....
And I thought REA was starting for Bewskys.... instead they start Koenig AGAIN
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Yeeshh. Take a nap; wake up and.... Pitcher changes!
Williams and his 11 game HOT STREAK (posted earlier) is a non-issue now that they placed him on the DL.....Not enough time for me to evaluate this HERZ lefty from AAA and the game is underway.....
And I thought REA was starting for Bewskys.... instead they start Koenig AGAIN
For some reason, the TIGGERS pulled the good bat of URSHELA (.313 v. righties!!!) out of their lineup and put in some callup from Toeldo... Tiggers are already without their BEST bat, CARPENTER!! WTF?
I already had TEXAS with a miniscule edge (but not enough to justify a bet) but now that edge has increased just enough:
from pinnacle
TEXAS -108
2
For some reason, the TIGGERS pulled the good bat of URSHELA (.313 v. righties!!!) out of their lineup and put in some callup from Toeldo... Tiggers are already without their BEST bat, CARPENTER!! WTF?
I already had TEXAS with a miniscule edge (but not enough to justify a bet) but now that edge has increased just enough:
Tuesday, for curiosity sake, this is what my capping sheets indicate...
Most involve taking an alt-totalafter rounding UP to the next highest integer....doing that is what resulted in the recent 20 - 12 run, although there are no guarantees this will continue:
Cleveland game....suggest 7.0 net runs ....so under 9.0 ??
Pirates game ....suggests 7.0 net runs ....so under 8.0 ??
VOID* Nationals game ....suggests 7.9 net runs ....so under 9.0 alt-line ??
BoSox game ....suggests 7.2 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line ??
Astros game ....suggests 7.8 net runs ....so under 9 ??
Rockies game ....suggests 9.1 net runs ....so under 11 alt-line??
The NATS game under (just for tracking only) is VOID due to P/C
But now added (for tracking only!) is the CUBS game (8.0 runs?? with wind drifting slightly in) if 10.0 is selected on the alt-total
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Tuesday, for curiosity sake, this is what my capping sheets indicate...
Most involve taking an alt-totalafter rounding UP to the next highest integer....doing that is what resulted in the recent 20 - 12 run, although there are no guarantees this will continue:
Cleveland game....suggest 7.0 net runs ....so under 9.0 ??
Pirates game ....suggests 7.0 net runs ....so under 8.0 ??
VOID* Nationals game ....suggests 7.9 net runs ....so under 9.0 alt-line ??
BoSox game ....suggests 7.2 net runs ....so under 9 alt-line ??
Astros game ....suggests 7.8 net runs ....so under 9 ??
Rockies game ....suggests 9.1 net runs ....so under 11 alt-line??
The NATS game under (just for tracking only) is VOID due to P/C
But now added (for tracking only!) is the CUBS game (8.0 runs?? with wind drifting slightly in) if 10.0 is selected on the alt-total
McKenzie is a more or less mediocre starter for CLEVELAND, but him imploding today was not expected, esp after coming off 2 weak outings.....a rebound was more likely than a 3rd consecutive beatdown, esp to a KC team that is itself only mediocre v. righties
If he stays in for another inning, Cleveland going down; and the under is going bust in a hurry....
0
McKenzie is a more or less mediocre starter for CLEVELAND, but him imploding today was not expected, esp after coming off 2 weak outings.....a rebound was more likely than a 3rd consecutive beatdown, esp to a KC team that is itself only mediocre v. righties
If he stays in for another inning, Cleveland going down; and the under is going bust in a hurry....
Famous last words?? "It looks like a watered down and weak batting lineup tonight for the beleagured and offense-challenged WhiteSox tonight against their crosstown rivals, facing one of the BEST lefties in the gaame!"
This may come back to haunt me but the numbers are there in my capping sheets ....so I am going with it DESPITE my hesitancy with HUGE FAVS nowadays....
CUBBIES -279 (pinnacle)
PS, I don't like RL favs when home teams....
2
Famous last words?? "It looks like a watered down and weak batting lineup tonight for the beleagured and offense-challenged WhiteSox tonight against their crosstown rivals, facing one of the BEST lefties in the gaame!"
This may come back to haunt me but the numbers are there in my capping sheets ....so I am going with it DESPITE my hesitancy with HUGE FAVS nowadays....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.