Gippy Nation
I am embarrassed to say I again somehow made another "human error" in my betting in both the Rock League and Champ League. I meant to bet 80 on White sox but in my haste bet 80 on the cubs who were already out of the match. I also bet the wrong amount in the Champ League and bet !0 on the reds which should have been a $5 bet. UGHHHHH!
I have so screwed up my Match 1 that I am calling my Match 1 which is still profitable in both leagues and I am going to start over tomorrow with a Match 2 beginning again with all 30 teams. If you are not committing one betting error after another like me, then continue on until you finish your match or start running out of teams then start a match 2 accordingly. I would be way ahead if I could just quit getting my bets in wrong!. If there is a bright side we are adding to our data base daily on each team"s record as a dog.... so going down to the bottom level of bet sizing at this stage is not all bad news, especially with my bonehead errors.
I begin Match 2 tomorrow and will post my Match 1 results with all its comedy of errors at the end of the week
Good Luck
Gippy Nation
I am embarrassed to say I again somehow made another "human error" in my betting in both the Rock League and Champ League. I meant to bet 80 on White sox but in my haste bet 80 on the cubs who were already out of the match. I also bet the wrong amount in the Champ League and bet !0 on the reds which should have been a $5 bet. UGHHHHH!
I have so screwed up my Match 1 that I am calling my Match 1 which is still profitable in both leagues and I am going to start over tomorrow with a Match 2 beginning again with all 30 teams. If you are not committing one betting error after another like me, then continue on until you finish your match or start running out of teams then start a match 2 accordingly. I would be way ahead if I could just quit getting my bets in wrong!. If there is a bright side we are adding to our data base daily on each team"s record as a dog.... so going down to the bottom level of bet sizing at this stage is not all bad news, especially with my bonehead errors.
I begin Match 2 tomorrow and will post my Match 1 results with all its comedy of errors at the end of the week
Good Luck
If you are new and just want to get started with the super system now is a perfect time to start. You will be betting with me as I start a new match
Match 2
Champ League
1. Sd (game 1) 5/6
2. twins 5/5
3. CWSX 5/6.75
4. Tex 5/6.50
5. PHI 5/5.50
6. hou 5/8.25
7. Bal 5/8.25
8. 5/6
9. 5/5.25
10. Ariz5/6.50
check and double check
Good Luck
If you are new and just want to get started with the super system now is a perfect time to start. You will be betting with me as I start a new match
Match 2
Champ League
1. Sd (game 1) 5/6
2. twins 5/5
3. CWSX 5/6.75
4. Tex 5/6.50
5. PHI 5/5.50
6. hou 5/8.25
7. Bal 5/8.25
8. 5/6
9. 5/5.25
10. Ariz5/6.50
check and double check
Good Luck
Dog Ranking update
# teams have past the first significant statistical level of sample siz that being 12 games as a dog . Other teams are getting close. What kind of information does this give us about a team at this point. to be honest not a lot but if you go back and read terh thread this sample size tells us its more likely than not that a team will continue to perform at th esame level. Lets look at what we have:
1. Houston (13 games) WLLLWLLLLWLWL (.3076)
The Astros are winning at a clip of about 30% as a dog which is borderline. The good news is they have never lost more than 4 in a row as a dog which is actually more important. If we had a streak of 7 losses in a row it would be on my radar, but for now they are ok
2. Twins (13 games) LLWLWWLLLLWWW (.4615)
The Twins have one 4 game losing streak but otherwise are making us money. I like the recent pattern of 3 wins in a row. This is the kind of team that is making us the $ so far
3. Arizona (12 games) LLLLLWLWWLLL (.25)
The Arizona diamondbacks are not playing well as a dog. I also don't like that 5 game losing streak to start the season. The kind of team that will get eliminated if they don't pick it up. They are below our Gippy Mendoza line of .30
No other teams have hit 12 games but others are close. Should have more by the weekend. Of note Atlanta is 5-0 as a dog.and Miami is 0-5 as a dog.
Stay tuned, it will only get better and better
Good Luck
Dog Ranking update
# teams have past the first significant statistical level of sample siz that being 12 games as a dog . Other teams are getting close. What kind of information does this give us about a team at this point. to be honest not a lot but if you go back and read terh thread this sample size tells us its more likely than not that a team will continue to perform at th esame level. Lets look at what we have:
1. Houston (13 games) WLLLWLLLLWLWL (.3076)
The Astros are winning at a clip of about 30% as a dog which is borderline. The good news is they have never lost more than 4 in a row as a dog which is actually more important. If we had a streak of 7 losses in a row it would be on my radar, but for now they are ok
2. Twins (13 games) LLWLWWLLLLWWW (.4615)
The Twins have one 4 game losing streak but otherwise are making us money. I like the recent pattern of 3 wins in a row. This is the kind of team that is making us the $ so far
3. Arizona (12 games) LLLLLWLWWLLL (.25)
The Arizona diamondbacks are not playing well as a dog. I also don't like that 5 game losing streak to start the season. The kind of team that will get eliminated if they don't pick it up. They are below our Gippy Mendoza line of .30
No other teams have hit 12 games but others are close. Should have more by the weekend. Of note Atlanta is 5-0 as a dog.and Miami is 0-5 as a dog.
Stay tuned, it will only get better and better
Good Luck
We are tracking data on each team as a dog whether we are playing them or not. Around the all star break we will have a large enough statistical sample for most teams to know whether we want to include them in our matches are not.
As it turns out we are crushing the books at this point. Match 1 is over and was profitable. Match 2 is profitable but we began running out of teams so we started a Match 3, yesterday. the dogs played great again
After the allstar break we will expect to know who plays well as a dog and who doesn't.
A 44 games sample will give us a 90 percent accuracy result on the odds of a team losing 6 in a row as a dog. We will also have raw data on any team that lost 6 in a row as a dog.
I will be increasing my bet sizing at that point
Good Luck
We are tracking data on each team as a dog whether we are playing them or not. Around the all star break we will have a large enough statistical sample for most teams to know whether we want to include them in our matches are not.
As it turns out we are crushing the books at this point. Match 1 is over and was profitable. Match 2 is profitable but we began running out of teams so we started a Match 3, yesterday. the dogs played great again
After the allstar break we will expect to know who plays well as a dog and who doesn't.
A 44 games sample will give us a 90 percent accuracy result on the odds of a team losing 6 in a row as a dog. We will also have raw data on any team that lost 6 in a row as a dog.
I will be increasing my bet sizing at that point
Good Luck
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.