All Forums | MLB Betting

2014 Spring Training

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 97338
Posts: 1522
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 6398
Posted: #1401
Back from casino guys

Mets 
3/21 won 9-1 a wager game,,,,
3/22 a non wager game
3/23 a non wager game
3/24 a wager game mets won 5-3
Mets last 2 Games that were wager totals 14-4 = a +10 
I did screw up with Nats post as they won 4-1 so plz correct that and now its
Mets +10
Nats +1 so a No Play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 61
Posted: #1402
hey stevo

Rays and Braves still a play? I just submitted my bets few mins ago with this two plays
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 606
Posted: #1403
awesome thanks everyone for clearing that up I'm leaving the casino now and only did a two teamer for 2 units
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 826
Posted: #1404
Grrrrrrrreat lol... Already submitted mets,braves, rays... Good luck to me lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 235
Posted: #1405
on board with the 3 also mc , gl to us on the 3 and everyone else on the 2 , thanks stevo for all your work
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 61
Posted: #1406
Good luck to us guys. Need to sleep now, it's already 1:41am here in the Philippines. Good day everyone
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 606
Posted: #1407
stevo i was looking for you regarding morning coffee and baileys lol

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1212
Posted: #1408
I hate these no plays 10 minutes before game time.  

Well they are up 1-0 to start so we'll see.

GL to all 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5092
Posted: #1409
Quote Originally Posted by stevo1:

Hoyasaxa said

Angels not strong enough yesterday? Only won their last 5 games. I told you boys weeks ago they announced they would take ST more serious to open strong before they lose their fan base,even if it hurts their pitching this summer....I'm on them every game from here on out. Over paid failures like Pujols and Hamilton have a lot to prove too..look inside for motivation or lack of for other teams too...

 Sir,,, we did not play LAA yesterday or are we playing them today so what is your point,We will only play LAA when they have a DD Run Advantage and to date we have not seen them with this approach and with just another week left time is running out

I'm only pointing out there's other parameters at work that could be worth visiting to enhance your program here-local information-huge in making plays-you guys are studying this part of baseball-there isn't even a line on their game today for some reason...also thought some of your posters might know something important about their local teams. Sorry if I crossed some boundary

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1212
Posted: #1410
Mets implosion, down 5-3.  grrrr

I'd wager 80% of your "tailers" are on Mets.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 11390
Posted: #1411
I took oak last night when it was -120....now up to -170  This spring training betting is crazy....I just hope the public is right
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 237
Posted: #1412
If I'm understanding your system on the cleve game
It's Cleveland or no play
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2005
Posts: 24026
Posted: #1413
I understand a lot of you are tailing Steve-o but the info he provided on Mets-Nats was proven to be wrong way before game time, so if you still bet them before he realized his mistake & made it a no play, that's your own damn fault.

If you're going to follow someone so close that you're eating out of their behind, you better expect the occasional fart.

Absolutely no offense to you Steve-o, just hate seeing tailers get upset over their own choices
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 6398
Posted: #1414
Sorry guys on Nats gm as i mis posted it and have mets too so i screwed up and just have to hope they in some way can win this as had i not saw someone correct me i never would had saw it till later so just tried to stop anyone who looked late



 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 6398
Posted: #1415
Thanks revenge but i messed up and posted the wrong score in for Nats last night at 1-4 in lieu of 4-1 and never caught it till someone called me out on it but i had already wagered on it so maybe in some way the mets can come thru,,,


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 6398
Posted: #1416
Hoyasaxa,,, thanks bro just did not read it that way originally and i'm at fault AGAIN,,Its been a rough ST for me this year for some reason,,,,,,,,,,CM on Mets make me look good
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 193
Posted: #1417
Like I said earlier the system can only do so much. Without taking into consideration that WAS had in 7-8 of their opening day starters and their Ace pitching should have been enough to lean their way. Not bashing you at all Steveo, just a little food for thought.


That being said, Stevo, how do you feel about Oakland and Cleveland for the 4:05 (ET) games? 
I think Millone at home has the pitching edge over Francis. He never pitched well vs the AL with his tenure at COL, and the A's lineup is full with Crisp, Donaldson, Lowrie, Cespedes, and Reddick all playing. 
Cincy's only real fire power in their lineup today is Phillips. No Votto, no Bruce, and no Choo. With the big hit their bullpen took losing Chapman I just see too much offense for Oakland to not take this game. They also lost yesterday and (besides double headers) have only lost a game two days in a row once this ST.


Sorry if it seems like Im posting my picks in your thread, just wanted to provide some information and see if you agree with me or not. I'm thinking at least a unit on Oakland. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 193
Posted: #1418
And to add about Cleveland, I would solely use your system in that pick since I can't find the Rangers lineup online. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 344
Posted: #1419
Well I guess Pitt will be an automatic play as they are only ahead 22-3 in the 8th so that is +19 and that ought to carry them through this last week of ST.!!!!!!  (LOL)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 1769
Posted: #1420

Quote Originally Posted by santafeken:

Well I guess Pitt will be an automatic play as they are only ahead 22-3 in the 8th so that is +19 and that ought to carry them through this last week of ST.!!!!!!  (LOL)

That is a situation that I was also thinking about. If a team has one very high scoring game, it could carry them for the next two, even though they might not be fielding a very good team/have very bad starters beginning the game. In this case, it would be backing two bad bets.

Money is a good servant, but a bad master
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 11390
Posted: #1421
I have STL tomorrow....I get wainwright at home @ -125 and STL coming off 2 losses. They won't lose 3 in a row. I love betting spring training  1 pick a day
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 2600
Posted: #1422
Stevo didn't you work some filters into system so high scoring runs from a single game wouldn't be such a big factor?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 2
Posted: #1423
stevo, could you add how many units should we bet on each match ? It was very helpful for me.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 187
Posted: #1424
this is very confusing trend...what is the pick here guys...??
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 344
Posted: #1425
It is not a confusing thread you just have to think a little.

BrickShot Stevo did not address the issue of big scores tilting things.

I did.

I suggested if a team scored 10 then multiply it by .9
over 12 then X .8
over 14 then by .7
I think that is as far as I went.  Did not figure on anybody scoring 22 like Pitt did yesterday.
I think anybody scoring over 18 then reduce by .5

Just my thoughts but I think it does make sense,otherwise things will be way off for the big scoring team, for some time.

I did not figure anything on the big loser.


All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.