----------------------------------------------------------- Performance History -----------------------------------------------------------
Overall 2016: 156-115-15 (58%), +11.10% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk
Picks of the Day 2016: 48-30-6 (60%), +15.98% Return on Risk 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk
----------------------------------------------------------- Performance History -----------------------------------------------------------
Overall 2016: 156-115-15 (58%), +11.10% Return on Risk 2015: 298-267-32 (53%), +6.46% Return on Risk 2014: 826-685-112 (55%), +4.13% Return on Risk
Picks of the Day 2016: 48-30-6 (60%), +15.98% Return on Risk 2015: 108-87-12 (55%), +14.17% Return on Risk 2014: 121-72-16 (63%), +16.60% Return on Risk
Regress, how so and why? Kind of a vague statement and doesn't provide any guidance as to what the implications of the undefined regression mean for bettors.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RLeith35:
I think Balt is about to regress.
Regress, how so and why? Kind of a vague statement and doesn't provide any guidance as to what the implications of the undefined regression mean for bettors.
In BOB we trust, you handicap skills have helped me Win more chips When I just look at the Padre pitchers record (W/L 0-5, ERA 8.54), I like the Run Line with Baltimore. The power Rangers have paid off way more often than not with favorable odds this year.
Thank you BOB for your great handicapping. Lets all get paid except the guys on the Yankees and Padres tonight
0
In BOB we trust, you handicap skills have helped me Win more chips When I just look at the Padre pitchers record (W/L 0-5, ERA 8.54), I like the Run Line with Baltimore. The power Rangers have paid off way more often than not with favorable odds this year.
Thank you BOB for your great handicapping. Lets all get paid except the guys on the Yankees and Padres tonight
The only reasons I may disagree with the RL play on the O's are their record away from home this season (14-17) compared to their home record (31-13) and the solid play from the SD bullpen as of late. Other than that, I want to pull the trigger. Not to mention, I especially value your handicapping ability.
The only reasons I may disagree with the RL play on the O's are their record away from home this season (14-17) compared to their home record (31-13) and the solid play from the SD bullpen as of late. Other than that, I want to pull the trigger. Not to mention, I especially value your handicapping ability.
In BOB we trust, you handicap skills have helped me Win more chips When I just look at the Padre pitchers record (W/L 0-5, ERA 8.54), I like the Run Line with Baltimore. The power Rangers have paid off way more often than not with favorable odds this year.
Thank you BOB for your great handicapping. Lets all get paid except the guys on the Yankees and Padres tonight
Wagering on Rangers (2016)
Weighted-Average Line: +112 Record: 18-7 (72%) Return on Risk: +59.38%
0
Quote Originally Posted by WinMoreOften:
In BOB we trust, you handicap skills have helped me Win more chips When I just look at the Padre pitchers record (W/L 0-5, ERA 8.54), I like the Run Line with Baltimore. The power Rangers have paid off way more often than not with favorable odds this year.
Thank you BOB for your great handicapping. Lets all get paid except the guys on the Yankees and Padres tonight
Wagering on Rangers (2016)
Weighted-Average Line: +112 Record: 18-7 (72%) Return on Risk: +59.38%
Through Sunday June 26th, MLB teams have averaged approximately 75
games this season, almost 50% of their schedule. For much of this
season, including through May, home teams were winning less than 50% of
the games. Their fortunes have changed in June, with the record now
standing 595-538 for 52.5%. That is a result of the success of American
League home teams, which are now 312-256 (54.9%). Home teams are still
languishing at 283-282 (50%) in the National League.
In the last two weeks, I examined home/road dichotomies for the best
and worst pitchers in each league. Last Thursday, I authored an article
suggesting BUY and SELL ratings for
all teams of MLB based on batting and pitching OPS numbers after 70
games. Today’s article is a combination of those two lines of thinking.
Much like last week’s BUY and SELL article, I will list each of the
teams by their strength of HOME FIELD. I will then place a separate
column of ranking for each their OPS batting numbers, and their inverted
OPS home pitching numbers. We invert these numbers, because unlike
batting numbers where higher is better, in pitching numbers, the lower
number is better. Finally, I combine these two groups of batting and
pitching numbers, then rank them from best to worst. When that combined
rating is 7 positions or more better or worse than the home ranking W/L
number, you have a BUY or SELL rating on the team.
Quite simply, this means that the BUY teams figure to improve their
record for the year to date at home, while the home record of the SELL
teams is projected to decline in the near future. At the conclusion of
the chart, I will point out specifically which of the teams have flashed
their BUY and SELL ratings.
0
Through Sunday June 26th, MLB teams have averaged approximately 75
games this season, almost 50% of their schedule. For much of this
season, including through May, home teams were winning less than 50% of
the games. Their fortunes have changed in June, with the record now
standing 595-538 for 52.5%. That is a result of the success of American
League home teams, which are now 312-256 (54.9%). Home teams are still
languishing at 283-282 (50%) in the National League.
In the last two weeks, I examined home/road dichotomies for the best
and worst pitchers in each league. Last Thursday, I authored an article
suggesting BUY and SELL ratings for
all teams of MLB based on batting and pitching OPS numbers after 70
games. Today’s article is a combination of those two lines of thinking.
Much like last week’s BUY and SELL article, I will list each of the
teams by their strength of HOME FIELD. I will then place a separate
column of ranking for each their OPS batting numbers, and their inverted
OPS home pitching numbers. We invert these numbers, because unlike
batting numbers where higher is better, in pitching numbers, the lower
number is better. Finally, I combine these two groups of batting and
pitching numbers, then rank them from best to worst. When that combined
rating is 7 positions or more better or worse than the home ranking W/L
number, you have a BUY or SELL rating on the team.
Quite simply, this means that the BUY teams figure to improve their
record for the year to date at home, while the home record of the SELL
teams is projected to decline in the near future. At the conclusion of
the chart, I will point out specifically which of the teams have flashed
their BUY and SELL ratings.
St Louis (+20)
Last week, I issued an overall BUY sign on St Louis, asking the
question, for how long is the 15-21 home record of a team who has won 50
or more home games forever going to last? With the #11 home OPS batting
number of .760 and #6 OPS home pitching rating of .326, the Cardinals
have the overall home rating of #6 at 1.096. Yet they have only the
26th best home record at 15-21. A major adjustment is about to occur.
Boston (+9)
The Red Sox have a solid home record of 23-18, but they are in a bit of a
funk on a 12-17 slide after a 29-17 start. With the #2 ranked home
batting OPS at .839 and the #14 ranked pitching OPS at home of .278,
their 1.117 combined rating is the third best home ranking in MLB odds. Yet their 12th ranked home record implies there is plenty of room for improvement, which can be expected to soon come.
Seattle (+8)
Much like the Seattle once best in MLB road record has begun to even
out, so should we expect that their 17-19 home record will begin to
surge. That’s good for only 20th in MLB, while their combined numbers of
14 in batting and 13 in pitching have them at a #12 rank of 1.038, 8
positions above their current record. Mariner numbers are good enough
that they should be a winning team. Expect much of that success for MLB pick to come at home.
0
BUY teams:
St Louis (+20)
Last week, I issued an overall BUY sign on St Louis, asking the
question, for how long is the 15-21 home record of a team who has won 50
or more home games forever going to last? With the #11 home OPS batting
number of .760 and #6 OPS home pitching rating of .326, the Cardinals
have the overall home rating of #6 at 1.096. Yet they have only the
26th best home record at 15-21. A major adjustment is about to occur.
Boston (+9)
The Red Sox have a solid home record of 23-18, but they are in a bit of a
funk on a 12-17 slide after a 29-17 start. With the #2 ranked home
batting OPS at .839 and the #14 ranked pitching OPS at home of .278,
their 1.117 combined rating is the third best home ranking in MLB odds. Yet their 12th ranked home record implies there is plenty of room for improvement, which can be expected to soon come.
Seattle (+8)
Much like the Seattle once best in MLB road record has begun to even
out, so should we expect that their 17-19 home record will begin to
surge. That’s good for only 20th in MLB, while their combined numbers of
14 in batting and 13 in pitching have them at a #12 rank of 1.038, 8
positions above their current record. Mariner numbers are good enough
that they should be a winning team. Expect much of that success for MLB pick to come at home.
Texas Rangers
The Rangers lead the MLB in one run games at 17-4. That’s a major reason
in and of itself that there will be an adjustment. They enter their
game on Friday on a recent 15-3 surge; yet another reason to expect an
adjustment. With the #11 batting rank and #17 pitching rank, their
combined OPS is just 1.014, 13th best in MLB. But as a whopping 11
positions worse than the #2 record in baseball at 46-26, the above
factors are a clear SELL sign for the Rangers.
San Francisco Giants
The Giants are obviously the hottest team in MLB betting,
as after Thursday’s 5-3 win vs the Pirates their recent surge is now
30-9, including 11-1 recently in which they’ve averaged nearly 6 RPG.
Atop of the rotation with three great starters makes them tough to play
against, but the batting is just 17th in MLB for the course
of the season, and their overall rank is #10, 7 positions higher than
their #3 ranking. It is an even numbered year, so San Francisco may well
go on to capture the World Series, but for right now they are a
definite fade, as a short term adjustment is about to happen.
0
SELL teams:
Texas Rangers
The Rangers lead the MLB in one run games at 17-4. That’s a major reason
in and of itself that there will be an adjustment. They enter their
game on Friday on a recent 15-3 surge; yet another reason to expect an
adjustment. With the #11 batting rank and #17 pitching rank, their
combined OPS is just 1.014, 13th best in MLB. But as a whopping 11
positions worse than the #2 record in baseball at 46-26, the above
factors are a clear SELL sign for the Rangers.
San Francisco Giants
The Giants are obviously the hottest team in MLB betting,
as after Thursday’s 5-3 win vs the Pirates their recent surge is now
30-9, including 11-1 recently in which they’ve averaged nearly 6 RPG.
Atop of the rotation with three great starters makes them tough to play
against, but the batting is just 17th in MLB for the course
of the season, and their overall rank is #10, 7 positions higher than
their #3 ranking. It is an even numbered year, so San Francisco may well
go on to capture the World Series, but for right now they are a
definite fade, as a short term adjustment is about to happen.
Milwaukee (7)
The Brew Crew has a winning home record of 21-18, based largely on the
#12 ranked home batting OPS of .760. Not sure that will look the same in
the near future, as the 25thranked pitching gives them a
more realistic #22 ranked home field, 7 positions worse than their
current mark. No surprise if Milwaukee dips under .500 at home in the
near future.
0
Milwaukee (7)
The Brew Crew has a winning home record of 21-18, based largely on the
#12 ranked home batting OPS of .760. Not sure that will look the same in
the near future, as the 25thranked pitching gives them a
more realistic #22 ranked home field, 7 positions worse than their
current mark. No surprise if Milwaukee dips under .500 at home in the
near future.
Baltimore (8)
The #2 home record in MLB at 31-13 is a function of the #4 ranked home
OPS batting number, which is .818. But it’s doubtful the pitching can
uphold that record, as they are ranked 23rd in MLB at home. A combined
#10 ranking is 8 positions lower than their current rank, implying a
return to Earth for the home record.
By J.gavazzi
0
Baltimore (8)
The #2 home record in MLB at 31-13 is a function of the #4 ranked home
OPS batting number, which is .818. But it’s doubtful the pitching can
uphold that record, as they are ranked 23rd in MLB at home. A combined
#10 ranking is 8 positions lower than their current rank, implying a
return to Earth for the home record.
The only reasons I may disagree with the RL play on the O's are their record away from home this season (14-17) compared to their home record (31-13) and the solid play from the SD bullpen as of late. Other than that, I want to pull the trigger. Not to mention, I especially value your handicapping ability.
BOL
O's road record is the reason why I'm staying away from this game as well
0
Quote Originally Posted by steelersbets:
BoB,
The only reasons I may disagree with the RL play on the O's are their record away from home this season (14-17) compared to their home record (31-13) and the solid play from the SD bullpen as of late. Other than that, I want to pull the trigger. Not to mention, I especially value your handicapping ability.
BOL
O's road record is the reason why I'm staying away from this game as well
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.