Its because I am a bitter loser.
No seriously - I just looked at the lines today and thought "because of the schedule tonight, and because of the pitchers - this parlay must be bet off the hook tonight..."
I dont think it will lose, I wouldnt bet against any of those teams - so not making judgement on it. Really just pointing out that it must be one of the biggest parlays bet this MLB season.
Its because I am a bitter loser.
No seriously - I just looked at the lines today and thought "because of the schedule tonight, and because of the pitchers - this parlay must be bet off the hook tonight..."
I dont think it will lose, I wouldnt bet against any of those teams - so not making judgement on it. Really just pointing out that it must be one of the biggest parlays bet this MLB season.
If I had to rank them in order - to go against them....
I would say the first likeliest to lose is Phi, followed by STL, then NYY, then Col.
If I had to rank them in order - to go against them....
I would say the first likeliest to lose is Phi, followed by STL, then NYY, then Col.
No apologies necessary!!
I realize I come off as a sarcastic prick here sometimes. A lot of times, I dont mean to, sometimes I do mean to.
This was one of those times I came off (i guess) as an unintentional sarcastic prick.
I think there is a lack of highly bettable games tonight for the general public - and there are 4 "looks too good to pass up" teams on the schedule. Like I said, I wouldnt bet against those 4 either.
No apologies necessary!!
I realize I come off as a sarcastic prick here sometimes. A lot of times, I dont mean to, sometimes I do mean to.
This was one of those times I came off (i guess) as an unintentional sarcastic prick.
I think there is a lack of highly bettable games tonight for the general public - and there are 4 "looks too good to pass up" teams on the schedule. Like I said, I wouldnt bet against those 4 either.
No apologies necessary!!
I realize I come off as a sarcastic prick here sometimes. A lot of times, I dont mean to, sometimes I do mean to.
This was one of those times I came off (i guess) as an unintentional sarcastic prick.
I think there is a lack of highly bettable games tonight for the general public - and there are 4 "looks too good to pass up" teams on the schedule. Like I said, I wouldnt bet against those 4 either.
No apologies necessary!!
I realize I come off as a sarcastic prick here sometimes. A lot of times, I dont mean to, sometimes I do mean to.
This was one of those times I came off (i guess) as an unintentional sarcastic prick.
I think there is a lack of highly bettable games tonight for the general public - and there are 4 "looks too good to pass up" teams on the schedule. Like I said, I wouldnt bet against those 4 either.
I dont think Philly will lose.
But if you asked me to take one of those 4, at the same odds, to lose - I would take Philly.
I dont think Philly will lose.
But if you asked me to take one of those 4, at the same odds, to lose - I would take Philly.
No apologies needed....You were right on. GL
You are getting very close to breaking my top 5 current stalker list.
Good work.
No apologies needed....You were right on. GL
You are getting very close to breaking my top 5 current stalker list.
Good work.
You are getting very close to breaking my top 5 current stalker list.
Good work.
Your not that important you just think you are
You are getting very close to breaking my top 5 current stalker list.
Good work.
Your not that important you just think you are
Your not that important you just think you are
So far 3 posts in my thread.
What if I call you insecure? Will you spend an hour telling me how you are not insecure?
Your not that important you just think you are
So far 3 posts in my thread.
What if I call you insecure? Will you spend an hour telling me how you are not insecure?
Plus, the Giants fit the same system as Seattle last night - they're a dog of more than +130 looking to avenge a shutout loss from the day before. These dogs win half the time, and at +130 or greater, hitting 50% is some sweet, sweet action.
However, there's nothing sweet about Brad Penny.
Plus, the Giants fit the same system as Seattle last night - they're a dog of more than +130 looking to avenge a shutout loss from the day before. These dogs win half the time, and at +130 or greater, hitting 50% is some sweet, sweet action.
However, there's nothing sweet about Brad Penny.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.