$251
Dodgers-Rockies, Under 6.5, -110, Buehler/Lambert
Say
what you want about Coors Field and/or these powerful teams, but the team of
Buehler-Lambert holds most of the advantages over the offenses in the first 5
innings. Full game totals are computed with bullpens and the possibility of
extra innings involved, so I like them for overs, but the first 5 is a
pitcher’s game and they don’t have to settle a tie, so no extra innings
attached. The Rockies return from San Francisco, where their only impressive
display was Dahl’s grand slam (thank you very much) and the Dodgers are a team
that wins with pitching, not offense. I think 7 runs to beat me is pushing the
envelope.
BOL
3/28/19
Pending: $300.00 Reds UNDER 78.5 total
wins (Projected 75)
Probably
my only play of the day, but we’ll see.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
50-57,
-$1,622.26 (-5.41 “units”)
6/27/2019
First 5 Innings
$251
Dodgers-Rockies, Under 6.5, -110, Buehler/Lambert
Say
what you want about Coors Field and/or these powerful teams, but the team of
Buehler-Lambert holds most of the advantages over the offenses in the first 5
innings. Full game totals are computed with bullpens and the possibility of
extra innings involved, so I like them for overs, but the first 5 is a
pitcher’s game and they don’t have to settle a tie, so no extra innings
attached. The Rockies return from San Francisco, where their only impressive
display was Dahl’s grand slam (thank you very much) and the Dodgers are a team
that wins with pitching, not offense. I think 7 runs to beat me is pushing the
envelope.
BOL
3/28/19
Pending: $300.00 Reds UNDER 78.5 total
wins (Projected 75)
That freakin JEG probably has to work tonight and is sleeping in. Later he will whine and moan about missing winners he had picked. Either that or he is busy handicapping beaverball.
Good afternoon JEG.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
That freakin JEG probably has to work tonight and is sleeping in. Later he will whine and moan about missing winners he had picked. Either that or he is busy handicapping beaverball.
Good luck sir! That game last Friday night @ Dodger Stadium w/Buehler and Marquez was a gem and a lovely under. I live out here in Denver, may have to snag a ticket after work and cheer for another duel.
0
Good luck sir! That game last Friday night @ Dodger Stadium w/Buehler and Marquez was a gem and a lovely under. I live out here in Denver, may have to snag a ticket after work and cheer for another duel.
Let me put it this way looking at 1 of Lambert's home starts and the fact that the Dodgers have seen him and that the Dodgers are are 6-2 on Thursday and Colorado is 8-2. I probably would pass on this one
0
Let me put it this way looking at 1 of Lambert's home starts and the fact that the Dodgers have seen him and that the Dodgers are are 6-2 on Thursday and Colorado is 8-2. I probably would pass on this one
Good luck key I really like the play too buehler has been pitching better of late as oppose to his rough start for him anyways this year and lambert has been pitching great since he’s been called up
0
Good luck key I really like the play too buehler has been pitching better of late as oppose to his rough start for him anyways this year and lambert has been pitching great since he’s been called up
Let me put it this way looking at 1 of Lambert's home starts and the fact that the Dodgers have seen him and that the Dodgers are are 6-2 on Thursday and Colorado is 8-2. I probably would pass on this one
Tuck, you pass on everything that does fit the big wide wonderful world of trends. I don't know why you stop in here. So, if the F5 stays under you don't come back, and if it goes over you just come back to gloat about how your trend following could not possibly have been wrong. What's the point? Do you think I am suddenly going to see the light and become a dedicated trend follower?
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by tuck321:
Let me put it this way looking at 1 of Lambert's home starts and the fact that the Dodgers have seen him and that the Dodgers are are 6-2 on Thursday and Colorado is 8-2. I probably would pass on this one
Tuck, you pass on everything that does fit the big wide wonderful world of trends. I don't know why you stop in here. So, if the F5 stays under you don't come back, and if it goes over you just come back to gloat about how your trend following could not possibly have been wrong. What's the point? Do you think I am suddenly going to see the light and become a dedicated trend follower?
This thread needs more entertainment and pointless banter.
Where is Jeg? In too deep studying the algorithms of women's menstrual cycles from the WNBA?
Anyone handicap any bowling lately?
The last bowler I remember following was person Weber, and I believe he now has a grandson, maybe a great-grandson, on the tour. The last time I was in a bowling alley it was because their snack bar made great onion rings. Or maybe it was because the bartender was one of my bookies. Either way, that was in Omaha and I left there 32 years ago. I would rather understudy JEG than handicap bowling, and that thought nauseates me.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
This thread needs more entertainment and pointless banter.
Where is Jeg? In too deep studying the algorithms of women's menstrual cycles from the WNBA?
Anyone handicap any bowling lately?
The last bowler I remember following was person Weber, and I believe he now has a grandson, maybe a great-grandson, on the tour. The last time I was in a bowling alley it was because their snack bar made great onion rings. Or maybe it was because the bartender was one of my bookies. Either way, that was in Omaha and I left there 32 years ago. I would rather understudy JEG than handicap bowling, and that thought nauseates me.
You gotta love the "person" Weber. OK Covers it was Richard Weber, although I never heard anyone call him Richard. For all the slime they let pass around here you would think that one would have slipped by.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
You gotta love the "person" Weber. OK Covers it was Richard Weber, although I never heard anyone call him Richard. For all the slime they let pass around here you would think that one would have slipped by.
Well, that was embarrassing. I didn't know it was "Ferris Buehler's Day Off" or that Lambert would not be able to throw a strike unless it was thigh high or above. He couldn't hit the zone between the knees and upper thighs. Cya tomorrow.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Well, that was embarrassing. I didn't know it was "Ferris Buehler's Day Off" or that Lambert would not be able to throw a strike unless it was thigh high or above. He couldn't hit the zone between the knees and upper thighs. Cya tomorrow.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.